Devin

@CrashiusClay69 Do one for Portugal

We are making parlays where we hit the first legs And leave the last leg as a world cup winner To try and turn $1k to $300k So far we got 2 World cup parlays running 1 for Croatia 1 for Colombia Tryna make a few more so we have multiple teams to cheer on during the world cup 🤣 I dont fuck with spain, portugal, england So im not doing on those Whos a sleeper world cup winner this year to make a parlay for Hopefully its not spain england or portugal

@joostienXD @morsyxbt Most of these guys in his image did get paid lol

@morsyxbt Your claims have no merit cause I didn’t get paid and you also called the founder of predict an undisclosed paid shill for posting his own project idiot x.com/joostienxd/sta…

all of these posts are undisclosed paid shills : kols were reportedly paid $200-$1000 for not adding the PAID PARTNERSHIP TAGs to predictdotfun ads the campaign is still ongoing, we might see more kols accepting and shilling this without disclosure take notes

@CarOnPolymarket Yeah and don’t forget Kalshi now wants to collect your employment data 😭

So lame. Here is the answer & the reason.

@metaversejoji people realize this token is retarded asf

any news? 😂

@0xRiver8 @blknoiz06 Bro didn’t add me 🥀

Swan fund

@dan123 @mikasasolslayer Yup @LiquidityPump runs that account and many more He also runs the OG group where he spam pings where he does his shitty ass launches using the Bolivian account or any of the other various accounts he runs

@mikasasolslayer Oh naw bro 😭😭🙏 @0xDevin_ doesn’t that Liq guy run the account

He wanted supply for Kilroy as well. I politely refused, and he still has the audacity to ask me for supply again. I NEVER gave supply to KOLS in projects I'm pushing. Only have been respectful for him, just for him to nonstop fud $jotchua to death. Not cool.

Someone please explain to me why England has the same odds as Portugal to win the World Cup 😭😭😭 Bro England is terrible they genuinely have 0 chance

The best bet you’ll place for #UFCFreedom250 .5 Units at +903🔒 Who could even sell this?

@alanshz Ok, it locking at 100K actually makes me feel a lot better about the model However it is based on equity, that’s what it says in your own FAQ 😭

@0xDevin_ It’s balance based, not equity. It also locks in the initial balance. This means that (in the case of 100k acc) once you’re up 3% or more, your trailing won’t go above the initial balance.

The break evaluation is inspired on futures prop model - 99$ for a 100k account - Payouts on demand - No min days traded - Up to $500k - 1 Phase As a trader, this is the evaluation I wish I'd had to trade crypto 4 years ago

@nyxxbt Why is bro in Ireland

Happy CPI day 🙌 Got some good luck while in Dublin 🍀

@NobleCoins Bros tweeting about a 2x from 3.7k 😭✌️

Talked 2x More potential

@AlvaroCFT I just don’t think trailing drawdown high equity watermark should ever exist on any firm It’s just a good way to have cheap prices for easy marketing but it’s impossible to actually trade with long-term

Yeah, I get your point. But every model needs balance. We’ve been in the industry for 3 years and we’ve all seen what happens when firms make everything too easy or way too cheap. It usually ends with hidden catches, payout denials or firms shutting down. Break is meant to be accessible, but still sustainable. And of course, it’s not our only model. If it doesn’t fit your style, we have other accounts with different rules and conditions 🫣

@CFTradercom’s new Break model looks like the best deal in crypto prop trading. Only $99 for a 100K Account. When you look more closely you can see that it’s a predatory model built to make inexperienced traders chase a payout they will never get.

@AlvaroCFT Yeah I mean other places will probably copy the break model aswell I just think it’s extremely predatory because of the trailing drawdown high equity watermark

@0xDevin_ My bad, I thought you mean on other places 🙏🫪

@0xDevin_ Where do you find 100k accounts for 200$? 🤯

@SpoiledBySpoily Tuff video

WHO made this 😭

@Trader_Luuk @CFTradercom Trailing equity high watermark with an all-in cost of $400-$500 to get a funded account is extremely predatory

What point are you trying to make? This is literally how all futures firms operate. So, in your view, are all futures firms ‘predatory models built to make inexperienced traders fail’? And if you don’t like the BREAK model, then you can simply choose the old-school two-phase challenges, right? They’re simply expanding their offering for people who want to trade this type of challenge on the crypto markets. They’re listening to customer feedback and putting it into practice.

cc @Osbrah @FerociousTrader @sinceuh @Trader_Luuk @alpystatx @Marresecira @duje_matic @iamdisplacement @neoktrades @CryptoPlays_ @daytradingrauf @trader_oas @crypto_erke @tradewithogloc @fakeTMTM @alanshz @AlvaroCFT

/9 Things like this are what gives the prop industry a bad rep. There is still no crypto prop firm that has a low barrier to entry and a similar model to the ones that have allowed skilled futures traders to thrive. I might just change that soon 👀

/8 The incentive for CryptoFundTrader is clear. A firm like this earns from eval fees. That isn’t a problem in it of itself, that’s how the prop firm industry works. However, when you have rules like this it becomes extremely predatory.