0xGrendel

@wuli238 开了

@0xbitkrabs 兄弟你好像设置了不能接收私信

很多手动交易的朋友都在吐槽： Polymarket 界面下单卡、响应慢，关键时刻真的要命。 我也实在忍不住了，做了一个小优化工具（图2左侧，支持win和mac），现在我捡尾盘用下来执行体验顺畅不少，延迟明显改善，对手动党帮助挺大。 有正在手动交易、被界面体验折磨的朋友，评论区打「工具」或「Polymarket工具」，我看到后会私信发给你~ 顺便问下大家： 👉 你最受不了 Polymarket 的哪一点？我看看还有没有能继续优化的地方～ 欢迎讨论！

@amyincrypto @MeetPolyHub lfg

🔥 PolyHub @MeetPolyHub 邀请码活动开跑！ PolyHub 目前 仅限邀请码加入 本次准备送出 5 个早鸟邀请码 🐦 在 3/8 23:59 UTC 前，参与 Hubble TG社群活动即可获得机会： 👉 每日社群活跃榜 Top1 → 1 个邀请码 👉 邀请 3 个好友加入群组 → 获得抽奖资格 👉 3 月 8 日 23:59 UTC 抽出 1 位 另外，Like + RT 本条推文 再抽 2 个邀请码 送给Hubble的早期支持者 ⏰24小时后抽取幸运儿 有早鸟用户开始跑出超强表现，赶紧加入预测市场掘金小分队！

@off_thetarget agent

#评论agent我私信你prompt 开发了一人华人街机构级别推送系统 (solo wall street system) 一共是8个agent，从分析 - 抓取 - 宏观 - 微观 - 风控 - 新闻 - 流动性 - 基本面 - 技术分析 一起帮助我分析（直接给我买入价 + 卖出价 + 评分 + 基本面 + 财报分析） 1️⃣ Macro Regime Agent 2️⃣ Sector Rotation Agent 3️⃣ Liquidity & Market Quality Agent 4️⃣ ICT Structure Agent 5️⃣ Flow & Derivatives Agent 6️⃣ News Catalyst Agent 7️⃣ Fundamental Stability Agent 8️⃣ Risk & Portfolio Control Agent

@amyincrypto @MeetPolyHub 求内测邀请码

PolyHub @MeetPolyHub 预测市场跟单实测报告：100U 小额批量跟单初见成效！（内测版，需邀请码）🚀 ✅ 测试策略： 自动化跟单机器，24H过夜运行 ✅ 当前战绩： 稳步盈利 22% ✅ 核心体验： 告别手动，实现“稳稳的幸福” ☺️ 下一步： 深度拆解高胜率“聪明钱”地址，复盘其擅长的事件驱动行情，持续迭代跟单参数。

@diegoxyz Done ✅

@0xbitkrabs Open DM please

@KASTxyz kast.xyz/pudgy-penguins…

Introducing Pengu Card 🐧💳 🤑 Up to 12% rewards 🏪 150M+ merchants 🌎 Available globally Join the waitlist to get a free card 👇

@playhuntertales HUNTER

February 10th. The Great Campaign awaits. Reply 'HUNTER' for early access to the Dark Continent.

@Leoninweb3 @MeetHubble waitlist

由 @MeetHubble 出品的Polymarket 跟单工具 PolyHub 马上开始邀请内测，有兴趣体验的小伙伴留言 “waitlist” 我们找到了4200个不同类型的市场标签下最赚钱的钱包地址，提供了各种灵活的跟单方式，并使用经历市场安全考验的第三方硬件钱包，旨在提供最好的跟单体验，帮忙找到 真正的Alpha

@MeetHubble Waitlist

Here's what I would do if I was a young person trying to break into VC: Write. Short writeups, on Twitter. Not generic market philosophical thinkpieces, because those will be assumed to be AI slop or regurgitated research. No one will read it unless you're brilliant, which you're probably not. Original research, on a specific company or sub-sector. If you want to write about robotics, even that is too broad. Narrow it down. Humanoid robotics, or healthcare robotics, military robotics, etc. Get really granular. So granular most people won't care. If it's something you could get by Googling, it's not narrow enough. You will not be able to find to do "original research" easily. This is not something you can do from a university library. You will have to go talk to people who work at these companies. Journalists who cover these companies. Pay for private industry-specific research / newsletters. Follow all of the employees/anons who are tweeting gossip. Integrate a picture that someone reading TechCrunch doesn't see. Then write about this sector and leading + new startups and tag / DM every investor at every major firm who covers your space (you can find them because they've invested in one of the companies in the sector). If they express interest, offer coffee meetings with everyone you can. Some will take you up on it. Do this enough times, you'll develop a reputation and get offered a job in venture. Don't need to go to business school, don't need to have a great angel portfolio or any of the above. "Get good deal flow" is wonderful if you have access to it, but most people just can't do this. If you're already surrounded by Stanford undergrads, you probably don't need advice to break into VC. But the above strategy--in principle anyone can do. Just need to have abnormal levels of agency and a willingness to basically do the job of a junior VC without anyone telling you to. (While you're doing this, best thing to do in the meantime is to also work at a company in the sector you're chasing after. But not always possible depending on your background. Thankfully, VC does not require any particular background. Lots of weirdos in VC, myself included.) I guarantee you, everyone wants to hire someone who can do the above. But very few candidates have this degree of agency. VC is not a "tracked" career. Hiring is arbitrary, firms are generally small and do not scale, and there is no standard path. This is good for you if you're willing to be weird. The thing that VCs have in common is that they are passionate about startups and understanding new industries. If you show that you already have that, a path will open for you.

@SynthesisTrade Synthesis

the synthesis discord opens tonight. only for a small, sharp group. Inside: • permanent OG role + badge • first access to tools, alpha and more like + comment "Synthesis" → we manually DM the invite while spots last.

if you're leaving crypto now, you probably didn't belong here to begin with tbh you gotta be a little mental to love this industry. I don't wanna sound crazy, but you gotta be a little fucked up to have the mindset to get up and do this everyday. when you get up and read 634 tweets, review 15-20 articles, and study 5-10 projects. you do that day in and day out you can't be social or do a lot of other activities. you gotta put on the blinders and have tunnel vision.

Since the second half of last year, a lot of my friends(OGs in crypto) left crypto, as they started to doubt their original belief in crypto/blockchain/Web3 like do projects really create value to the world, what’s profit market fit, only speculations like meme/perp/prediction projects survive in this cycle, do web3 projects like infra/social really have values? Right now, it’s almost the toughest mode for startups, vcs, traders and users. Narrative play is not working, and hot topics shift every week. Organic liquidity is drained to lower and lower on cex and dex. Even without listing fees, few ppl want to buy new/old tokens. Market manipulators create pump and dump with leveraged perp to operate small cap or old coins every day. We can always say defi or trading is the only pmf for crypto/blockchain. But OGs and builders like @VitalikButerin @pmarca always paint a bigger vision of world computer/web3 to not replace but at least build a better internet or crypto eat the world. With llms like @OpenAI @claudeai, not just crypto but all industries are facing a 100-1000 to 1 problem: one experienced person can do 100-1000 ppl’s job with llm’s help. New tools and products are releasing too fast and will be faster for the next 1-2 years. Not just in crypto but in web2, tech and engineering start to become admin work(assigning tasks to llms to complete). No matter for vcs and startups, keep pivoting and shipping is the only way out, until can dominate the particular sector. Staying relevant is the easy to say but hard and have to achieve to survive in this new meta. My Ph.D. advisor always says persistence pays off. Hope we can win this uphill battle. To friends, to ogs, to builders, to dreamers, to crypto. Based on my chats for the past few months with @VitalikButerin @tkstanczak @hosseeb @sreeramkannan @tarunchitra @ASvanevik @StaniKulechov @Lomashuk @lukejdpearson @13yearoldvc @YeruiZhang @jocyiosg @artofkot @no89thkey @xingpt @broleon

@CEXCsol @TheWhiteWhaleV2 malaysia boleh

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 See you in Malaysia bb🐋💦

Hi @TheWhiteWhaleV2 - we’d love to publicly extend this offer to you. Let’s have the best CEX ever, together.

When ppl claim this I always wonder how they think it happens, or have unrealistic expectations on how much $1bn actually is. I joined crypto with $200. If I held my initial bitcoin since then and never traded, I would have ~$300k. If, instead, from that moment I sold the top and bought the bottom of every crypto cycle on Bitcoin, and never paid any taxes, I would have ~$6m USD. If I put my entire net worth into the Ethereum ICO and never touched it, today I would have ~$150m pre-tax. While it was definitely possible to have made >$1bn with the opportunities in the market, these versions of reality would also require me to make no mistakes, and have no need to spend $ in real life, or take excessive risk via leverage. In reality, I grew up in a working class family. I didn’t have a trust fund and I had to pay off my student loan myself. I had a job at Tescos while at high school. After university, I needed to pay rent and fund cost of living and eventually buy a place to live. I worked at startups for relatively little $ salary, and while a couple have done okay, they still are illiquid and worth nothing until some exit. Perhaps if I erase a couple of dumb mistakes and drawdowns, or if I had a lil more grind, then my answer would be different today. But it is easy to say this with perfect hindsight vision. It’s easy to see where you could have optimised better, and decisions you made look dumb when the past makes things so obvious. The truth is I have always optimised for enjoying my life and not going to 0. I never felt like I had a safety net, so it was never possible for me to do anything in any other way. I would probably have less money if I had tried to add more risk or chased $ harder, because being all-in with your entire livelihood is a mental battle and I feel I only win that battle when the stakes are lower. In writing this, maybe I do understand why CT folks believe this, because modern CT sees crypto as a late-stage lottery ticket farm, where the optimal strategy is to 5x leverage up your portfolio in a hope of catching a good 20% move and then leaving. Or, literally going all-in on the next coin they heard Ansem is buying. So perhaps to them, looking back at the charts, of course that’s what successful folks did. In reality, I use leverage close to never (and typically to reduce risk rather than add risk — have used it to add risk maybe 3 times in the last 5 years, and maybe 15 times ever). I never go all-in on anything, have only ever done that on BTC and ETH before in the last decade. When I buy other things, I limit risk to tiny amounts, because I treat it as a 0 until proven otherwise (so, always <1% liquid portfolio). Liquid portfolio is also a smaller % of overall portfolio to future-proof against my own fuckups. Obviously I made a lot of money, I have been here 12 years! CT doesn’t want to hear about “getting rich in a decade” though. I am happy with where I am and have never really cared or optimised for maximising $ earnings, but instead having a nice life that lets me enjoy the game we play together.