BLM (Buster of Liberal Myths)

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk More "vibes".

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Buster of Myths? More like Buster of Moods. It’s not about the grammar, it’s about the fact that your 'evidence' is as imaginary as your restraint. But sure, keep a tally of my fallacies while you continue to cite 'the vibes' as your primary source.

Major

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Sorry my myth busting, busted your mood. Just because you can't operate your device, doesn't make the evidence imaginary. If it is not about the grammar, why did you make it about the grammar? I have cited exactly zero "vibes". Sounds like a possible "myth".

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Sorry, you can't work your device properly. My elderly senile aunt has the same problem. The "screenshot" is in fact a link. I can click on it, and it takes me right there. You have to click your mouse button or double tap your finger on it. google.com/search?smstk=C…

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk I’m looking, I’m looking! 👁️👄👁️ Still just seeing a tweet with zero links, zero citations, and a whole lot of 'trust me bro' energy disguised as a breakthrough. If the 'internal story' is so life-changing, feel free to drop the PDF instead of the riddles.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Oh boy, you got me on a grammar error made in haste. Gosh, you must feel so proud. You keep counting the grammar errors. I will keep counting your logical fallacies and bullshit.

"I didn't equate, I compared" — a distinction without a difference when the intent is to undermine institutional credibility with zero evidence. ​You’re right, you didn't say bloggers are gospel; you just treat them with the same uncritical faith. ​Next time you try to "bust a myth," try busting a dictionary first so you can learn the difference between your and you’re. 📖

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I'm sad that you don't understand the difference between comparing and equating. Do I "equate" the CDC to the Tobacco Institute? No. Do I "equate" their lies. No, I actually find the CDC lies to be far more egregious. Zero evidence? How can you be so damn naive? Leave the bubble

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk I'm not asking you to "trust me, bro". I'm asking you to get out of your liberal bubble & open your damn eyes. No, this is not about shifting scientific consensus. This is about straight up lies. They said/did one thing internally, but gave the public an entirely different story.

@1classic_lib @1bv_radar @elonmusk Ah yes, the classic 'trust me bro' school of epidemiology. Equating shifting scientific consensus during a literal global emergency with a 'blatant lie' is a bold move. I guess updating guidance as new data arrives is 'hiding things' now? Stay curious.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Btw, it is kind of weird that you think math somehow negates your false assertions. Especially unrelated math that hasn't been shown.

No false assertions here, just basic math. ​Pointing out that your "rapid decline" data relied on unweighted raw data—a fundamental error in survey science—isn't "scoring points," it's correcting the record. ​You can trust "common sense" over calculators if you want, but the reality is that gender-diverse identification is following a standard statistical plateau, not a "frenzy" fade.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Skippy, you clearly made false assertions. 1) I never "equated" the CDC to the tobacco Institute. I compared. I semi-expected the CDC to not blatantly lie. 2) I never "effectively said" political bloggers are gospel. If your gonna spew fallacies, just own it.

Equating the CDC to the Tobacco Institute is a massive self-own. ​The Tobacco Institute was a private lobby designed to hide data; the CDC is a public body that publishes it. You’re effectively saying: "If an expert says it, it’s a lie; if a political blogger says it, it’s Gospel." ​That’s not 'critical thinking,' it’s a security blanket for your bias. The medical consensus didn't change just because you're still mad about masks.

@wyrdtrtle @HarrietBGarner @MarkCha75305548 @tommyboy0690 It's both that I have a problem with.

It isn't the pay of teachers that the unions should be disbanded for, it's the curriculum, or lack there of, that I fault them for. When you start teaching children to hate everything their parents and nation stood for, you destroy that nation. They have created a population of lemmings with no connection to their own past.

@mathewguy6 @1bv_radar @elonmusk Again, feel free to share your peer reviewed data. I'll continue to wait. Then I will address this. Hint: you are coming up short.

Still waiting for you to explain the rapid decline." ​Here’s the explanation: Your "decline" was a math error. 📉 ​Eric Kaufmann's report used unweighted raw data. When independent researchers re-ran the numbers using standard survey weighting (you know, actual science), the "drop" vanished and showed a steady increase in gender-diverse identification. ​Imagine "busting myths" using a chart that any Intro to Stats student could debunk.

@Mintslice2 @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Sorry, but it depends highly on the specifics.

@1classic_lib @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Generally... Do you support financially supporting Eldery Disabled Veterans. Forget the specifics for a second, if you find a way that's OK with you, are you pro this support?

The most cruel and sadistic comments you will ever receive are literally always from someone with a Bible verse in their bio

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Curious, does it ever bother you that you spent 2 months asking me asinine questions and never once got the gotcha moment you have been so desperately seeking?

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Why are disability payments forcibly confiscating money while roads, hospitals and the police aren't framed this way?

@Mintslice2 @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Skippy, I wanted your take, especially since I already stated that social justice does not always infringe on individual justice. In the case of pensions. It doesn't. So thanks for the education. But as usual I was way ahead of you.

@1classic_lib @Donmega67 @S_D_Mannix @HorrorGorl Lmfao, stfu. You asked what pensions have to do with social justice, completely ignorant about how social justice isn't just gays and blacks, it's economic - glad I could educate you on that. What, like freeing slaves? Do you preference the slave owners or slaves liberty?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Every circumstance is different. I frame it accordingly. Eg, constitutional taxes are naturally framed differently than non constitutional forcible confiscation. Not sure why that is so hard to grasp.

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl It matters not one iota if I am religious, what matters is our founding fathers recognized the natural rights and graced us with a constitution that protects them.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Oh so you're religious? Lmfao. Yes but WHY did they decide to forcibly confiscate peoples money and redistribute it?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Because we clearly need money to fund a nation defense. Forcible confiscation is not inherently unconstitutional. You know that, right? Think of it as a necessary evil (in certain limited circumstances).

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Answer the question. Why does your constitution support forcibly confiscating money from citizens?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl In 2026, I support people being able to refuse service to people from all sorts of protected classes, including race, religion, sex...matters not if they are black, white, male, female, Christian, Muslim....

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl So you support forcing people to serve blacks? Or is that too authoritarian?

@Mintslice2 @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Correct, that is why there are no more people that are legally allowed to own slaves. "Surely you're" wrong with your idiotic assertions, yet again.

@1classic_lib @S_D_Mannix @Donmega67 @HorrorGorl Slave owners were allowed to own people. Surely you're against slave owners having their liberty removed to own people? Or you don't support authoritarian governments removing slavery?