Abstract Police

64 posts

Abstract Police banner
Abstract Police

Abstract Police

@AbstractPolice

Abstract Police 🚔 Tracking FUD. Exposing fake believers. Protecting the community.

가입일 Mart 2026
51 팔로잉29 팔로워
Abstract Police
Abstract Police@AbstractPolice·
The comment misrepresents the situation. Public Discord messages don’t reflect the full scope of involvement or decision-making. Speculation based on selective quotes from a single moderator is misleading and provides no meaningful insight. This isn’t an example of a mod abusing power. Comments are taken out of context, and during busy periods or major updates, moderators must enforce rules firmly to maintain productive discussions.
xav@xavhimself

Whole of Abstract community since launch: “Trust in Luca!” Meanwhile, a Discord mod (somehow on the Abstract team): “Luca isn’t that involved with Abstract” @LucaNetz do you have any insight on what the fuck this guy is talking about in the official Abstract discord server?

English
1
0
0
289
xav
xav@xavhimself·
Whole of Abstract community since launch: “Trust in Luca!” Meanwhile, a Discord mod (somehow on the Abstract team): “Luca isn’t that involved with Abstract” @LucaNetz do you have any insight on what the fuck this guy is talking about in the official Abstract discord server?
xav tweet media
English
29
4
124
14K
Abstract Police
Abstract Police@AbstractPolice·
Your claims are unsubstantiated and ignore measurable results. @AbstractChain consistently ranks among the top blockchains in daily revenue, with strong community engagement, growing user tiers, and active creator participation. The teams’ work on infrastructure, partnerships, and ecosystem tools drives this traction. XP and reward adjustments are part of ongoing optimization, not a reflection of poor performance. Public speculation about firing employees is misleading and unhelpful.
lilstaffX@lilstaffX

If @AbstractChain do not fire some core members of the community and ecosystem teams rapidly then we will never make it. These teams are dropping the ball continuously for abstract and letting us all down......they have had extremely poor performance over the last 6 months literally creating huge problems from an overall lack of judgment and poor execution. There is no world where I would continue to employ these poor performers who are so out of touch with reality. Whoever is in charge of recruitment at abstract needs to seriously up their standards in future and monitor employee performance much closer. Do better.

English
2
0
0
168
lilstaffX
lilstaffX@lilstaffX·
If @AbstractChain do not fire some core members of the community and ecosystem teams rapidly then we will never make it. These teams are dropping the ball continuously for abstract and letting us all down......they have had extremely poor performance over the last 6 months literally creating huge problems from an overall lack of judgment and poor execution. There is no world where I would continue to employ these poor performers who are so out of touch with reality. Whoever is in charge of recruitment at abstract needs to seriously up their standards in future and monitor employee performance much closer. Do better.
English
14
2
80
3.1K
Abstract Police
Abstract Police@AbstractPolice·
Highlighting revenue is not “bragging about high fees.” It simply reflects measurable on-chain activity - a clear signal of usage, not a marketing claim. Assuming most revenue comes from “votes” is misleading. Network earnings come from multiple interactions, not a single mechanic. Comparing Abstract to TRX is not meaningful. TRON operates at a different scale and serves a different purpose; absolute numbers alone do not provide relevant context. Short-term fluctuations in volume and TVL are normal across all networks. Broader market drawdowns, including NFTs, memes, and retail activity, affect every ecosystem. Developing standout applications takes time. Contrary to claims, Abstract already hosts multiple active products driving real engagement: 1. Cambria 2. Gigaverse 3. Onchain Heroes 4. Tollan Universe 5. RUYUI These applications are producing real traction. The ecosystem is still early-stage; multiple apps are developing and iterating simultaneously rather than relying on a single category-defining product. Evaluating them in isolation, or ignoring broader market conditions, does not reflect the actual progress. The network is active, users are engaging, and the ecosystem is growing. That is the reality - it is not “dead.”
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177

Please give me nerves and mental health lol Do you understand that Abstract bootlickers are bragging that the network is one of the most profitable from fees and charges? In such market conditions this is not something the team and their bootlickers should be bragging about. The more people know how much you earn the higher the expectations will be. How can you brag about earnings at a moment when there is no community growth, volume has been flat for months, TVL is dropping, NFTs and memes are all rekt by 80/90%, no top product or application has been delivered and despite the controversies surrounding Abstract and the team’s approach to the community. Instead of bragging about low fees and high number of users they brag about high fees. After checking daily votes the number increased, I’ll assume that 30/40k vote daily on apps so from votes the earnings are around 600/700 dollars lol Seriously and in this ranking TRX is still in first place with volume of 2.8 million and earnings of 1.13 million. Data for idiots 😂😂😂

English
0
0
1
144
qudev7🥷
qudev7🥷@Dominikz177·
Please give me nerves and mental health lol Do you understand that Abstract bootlickers are bragging that the network is one of the most profitable from fees and charges? In such market conditions this is not something the team and their bootlickers should be bragging about. The more people know how much you earn the higher the expectations will be. How can you brag about earnings at a moment when there is no community growth, volume has been flat for months, TVL is dropping, NFTs and memes are all rekt by 80/90%, no top product or application has been delivered and despite the controversies surrounding Abstract and the team’s approach to the community. Instead of bragging about low fees and high number of users they brag about high fees. After checking daily votes the number increased, I’ll assume that 30/40k vote daily on apps so from votes the earnings are around 600/700 dollars lol Seriously and in this ranking TRX is still in first place with volume of 2.8 million and earnings of 1.13 million. Data for idiots 😂😂😂
raven⚡✳️@bycoinraven

For those saying “ @AbstractChain is dead” just a quick reminder 😄 > Take a look at the daily revenue rankings. Abstract is sitting comfortably in the top 10, outperforming networks that the crypto world has talked about for years, networks worth billions. The same network you called “dead” because of an XP adjustment is generating: > one-sixth of Ethereum’s revenue, > one-fifth of BSC’s revenue, > and two-thirds of Arbitrum’s revenue. Do these look like the numbers of a “dead” network? If an XP adjustment shook your confidence, you’re probably not ready for real growth. @Abstract_Eco

English
10
1
29
3.9K
Abstract Police
Abstract Police@AbstractPolice·
Abstract isn’t lacking traction - it’s a consumer-focused L2 with real users, activity, and a growing ecosystem. This category scales over time, not overnight. Pudgy Penguins also aren’t dependent on a single chain. It’s a multi-layered ecosystem (brand, IP, products, token), and its performance aligns far more with broader market conditions than with any one platform. Large positions being down isn’t evidence of a specific issue - it’s standard market volatility. The same pattern exists across NFTs and tokens. If one factor were truly dragging everything down, you’d see uniform decline. That’s not happening. Reducing it to “Abstract underperformance” ignores how the market actually works.
EJR@EJRWEB3

I think there are several reasons why OG Pudgy Penguins aren’t performing well, but I’m confident one major factor is the severe underperformance of @AbstractChain The original core audience was largely Pudgy holders who believed in the chain and invested heavily. I personally know people who put in $100,000 or more into $PENGU, and now their positions are worth a fraction of that. There’s virtually no volume on Abstract, and its lack of traction is clearly putting downward pressure on the value of Pudgies.

English
0
0
0
107
Franz_Kafka
Franz_Kafka@Franz_Kafka_Abs·
GMABS everyone I’d like to touch on the topic of NFTs and share my opinion. The fact that NFT collections now give less XP seems like good news to me, because it means that low-quality NFT collections that were basically worthless and “survived” only thanks to XP will simply die out. Lately, I’ve started noticing random NFT collections popping up with inflated views on X and artificially boosted trading volumes on OpenSea, without any real utility or community. The creators of such collections simply manipulated the metrics, then gave whitelist access to their own wallets, minted NFTs, and received free XP, which was unfair to those who didn’t want to buy worthless NFT collections. Maybe this could be overlooked during a bull market, but not now. At the moment, such collections bring no value to the chain. The team has essentially shown how much these collections are really worth. Strong collections with a real product and community were only slightly affected (yes, there was some panic selling even in those collections, but that’s unavoidable). The team isn’t to blame that these collections didn’t work all this time and didn’t create real value, and it’s also not their fault that you bought a high-risk asset. I was one of those who always criticized the fact that NFTs gave XP, and I won’t go back on my beliefs. In my view, what the team did was the right move. I’m confident that over time we’ll see new strong collections emerge, and you’ll realize that we needed this kind of “cleanup.” @AbstractChain
Franz_Kafka tweet media
English
5
0
11
250
Bitman
Bitman@BitmanTW·
I was very bullish on Abstract last year. But now - They nuked XP for NFTs even after telling us to keep holding NFTs and tokens for XP - Luca said the TGE might happen last Q4 and now there’s no communication or confirmed timeline - Endless badges, we keep spending fees to complete tasks but it just never ends And the worst part is the DeFi side. I staked around $5k worth of ABX into xkABX on @KonaDeFi a few months ago. It’s now worth $42… with basically no liquidity left. Are you still holding NFTs/coins on Abstract?
Bitman tweet media
English
47
0
73
2K
MatKaiser ✳️
MatKaiser ✳️@KaisersolX·
Really disappointed to hear about @AbstractChain decision to stop distributing XP to NFT holders. Given that NFTs had already bled out over the last 6 months, prices are tanking today, down about -30% across all collections. Personally, I’m holding what I have. Despite the XP cut, I still believe in collections like @bearish_af , @ppuffins , @hamieverse , and many others; I’m not selling a thing. Time will tell if I’m right or wrong, but at these levels, it’s way too low to exit. I’m operating on the principle that we’ve hit rock bottom and can only go up from here. This is my worst XP week in a long time,which makes sense since my whole strategy was built around holding NFTs, ending with only 6,748 XP
MatKaiser ✳️ tweet media
English
12
0
46
3.3K
Aaiisha (Abstract ARC)
Aaiisha (Abstract ARC)@Aaiisha_Onchain·
Gm everyone! So as you know after what Abs chud says and Xp from yesterday all NFTs and mems are down bit I am going to give a suggestion to the team and also I will explain profit and loss on this new Meta Profit - Basically, I think the team is thinking about just community atm as you know so many Ppls are getting Xps in a lot for doing nothing, by just Holding memes and NFTs and real ones get less Xp even if they grind a lot they get less Xp then wales, I thought This is what team things rn as well and did this change so people who are working real and giving efforts can get good Xps instead of those Big wallets, as you can see there is a lot of wallets with 5-10 Transections in a week and they are at - Plat, diamond, so as of now they will not earn good XP! Loss - As you can see a huge Dump in NFTs and mems as well this is what a chain needs to Look good Right? As you can say a chain gets promotions if they have Best Mems and NFTs, also so many Ppls are angry on this new Meta a lot cuz they have been holding and losing a lot on this Chain for just XP, ik they will not sell their holdings on a -50X or a 90X maybe they will love to hold it for Xps 😅 I think both of them (Loss-profit) are equal in it, you could do what is minimize the Xp count for holders and give their Xps to grinders right? I thought that could be Great instead of Clearing Holders Xps What are your thoughts on it? Pls comment here (@LucaNetz SAVE YOUR CHAIN)
Aaiisha (Abstract ARC) tweet media
English
15
0
31
1.3K
Elusive 🏕️
Elusive 🏕️@Elusive_Pepe·
Wth is happening? Is this the answer?
Elusive 🏕️ tweet media
cygaar@0xCygaar

Since you guys keep QTing this post, I'll address some points here: - We made slight adjustments to the XP given to top NFT collections (by onchain activity, volume, market cap). We updated the calculation for many of the longtail collections because we received many reports of people mass holding super cheap NFTs to farm large amounts of XP. NFT projects that are no longer active were diluting the rewards for active NFT builders - this is not the behavior we want. - We will introduce a more dynamic system for NFT holdings designed to reward the most active collections starting next week. This system will adjust week by week and look at trading volume + onchain activity + overall ecosystem participation (ex. building interesting apps with your IP). - For memecoin holdings, we were basing the XP given based off of inflated trading volume and price data. A lot of this was done to soften the blow from the steep price decreases seen throughout crypto since October. We have since updated our internal values to be up to date which resulted in a decrease in memecoin XP. Starting next week, we will ramp up the XP given to memecoin teams actively building their IP and growing their holder base. - As communicated to our app builders previously, there will be an influx of XP given to teams creating onchain usecases, onboarding new users to Abstract, and building innovative mechanics. Several of these teams will be launching new apps and mechanics in the coming weeks. - We originally didn't want to change the calculation for holdings too much, which is why I tweeted the below tweet 3 weeks ago. However, after doing a deep dive into the XP distributed to inactive projects as well as going through the reports our community had flagged to us about XP abuse, we had to make changes to better reward those that are still active onchain participants in the ecosystem.

English
5
0
6
697
cuteinvestments🐧
cuteinvestments🐧@Artheistic·
Actually @AbstractChain ✳️ team did the right thing cutting dead NFTs XP. I hold a lot of those and this was OP, you invest 1 eth in absolutely worthless JPEGs, do nothing for 6 months and get nice XP. This does not stimulate chain’s activity or metrics. One week without XP for all NFTs is totally fine because XP system is dynamic from the beginning. Now it’s time to be more active on the chain. Play dope onchain games like @onchainheroes and provide liquidity through @Aborean for real this is more valuable than holding milady derivatives promoted by ex team members. So which collections deserve XP? I am sure it’s @onchainheroes @FugzOfficial @bearish_af @finalbosuX and gigaverse + some others that will ship soon 👀 tag projects that you like and specify why they deserve XP.
English
13
2
51
2.6K
ensar ✳️
ensar ✳️@enftsar·
gmabs ☀️ XP nerf on NFTs stings. I get the frustration. But XP was always dynamic. @AbstractChain is a long-term play with a multi-year roadmap; adjustments are part of growth. NFT communities matter, but one bump doesn’t change the vision. Let’s stay focused ✳️
ensar ✳️ tweet media
English
12
2
62
724
DecryptoPioneer
DecryptoPioneer@DecryptoPioneer·
Just clearing out the FUD here. As i said earlier, this recent XP change is much more dynamic & will benefit active ecosystem participants much more in the long term. In case you still don't know, my top bet in @AbstractChain remains the same. @Aborean & $ABX, i am looking for the yield & potential massive upside related to a protocol token that is direct beta play of the L2 layer. The 'XP' is Bonus! That's all.
cygaar@0xCygaar

Since you guys keep QTing this post, I'll address some points here: - We made slight adjustments to the XP given to top NFT collections (by onchain activity, volume, market cap). We updated the calculation for many of the longtail collections because we received many reports of people mass holding super cheap NFTs to farm large amounts of XP. NFT projects that are no longer active were diluting the rewards for active NFT builders - this is not the behavior we want. - We will introduce a more dynamic system for NFT holdings designed to reward the most active collections starting next week. This system will adjust week by week and look at trading volume + onchain activity + overall ecosystem participation (ex. building interesting apps with your IP). - For memecoin holdings, we were basing the XP given based off of inflated trading volume and price data. A lot of this was done to soften the blow from the steep price decreases seen throughout crypto since October. We have since updated our internal values to be up to date which resulted in a decrease in memecoin XP. Starting next week, we will ramp up the XP given to memecoin teams actively building their IP and growing their holder base. - As communicated to our app builders previously, there will be an influx of XP given to teams creating onchain usecases, onboarding new users to Abstract, and building innovative mechanics. Several of these teams will be launching new apps and mechanics in the coming weeks. - We originally didn't want to change the calculation for holdings too much, which is why I tweeted the below tweet 3 weeks ago. However, after doing a deep dive into the XP distributed to inactive projects as well as going through the reports our community had flagged to us about XP abuse, we had to make changes to better reward those that are still active onchain participants in the ecosystem.

English
1
0
3
71
N1rvy
N1rvy@itsN1rvy·
The @AbstractChain XP nerf makes kinda sense to me. People were earning ZO for doing basically nothing onchain, that had to change a bit imo.. Was it harder than it needed to be? Maybe. And the frustration from NFT communities is valid, holding was supposed to be rewarded in a way. But XP is dynamic and we knew that from the start. Transactions being rewarded never fully made sense to me either at this stage, though I could be missing context and things might be happening behind the scenes. Abstract is a long term play regardless. I’m onchain for the games and community anyway. 🥱🥱
N1rvy tweet media
English
4
1
26
657
Abstract Police
Abstract Police@AbstractPolice·
The XP adjustment is a strategic move to ensure long-term ecosystem growth. Early NFT rewards bootstrapped adoption, but Abstract now focuses on broad user engagement and real utility. Redirecting incentives toward active usage strengthens the chain and benefits all holders. Short-term changes support sustainable, long-term value.
Placeholder.hl@PlaceholderKey

@KaisersolX @AbstractChain Really sucks considering Luca told the community NFT holders will be the focus. Abstract lost a lot of credibility as of late. It's hard to recover from that.

English
1
0
2
332

탐색

@xavhimself @LucaNetz @vincent_pp4806 @Abstract_Eco @AbstractChain @abschud @0xCygaar @lilstaffX