AbsurdNarrative

Facial muscle yoga

No voter ID, especially when combined with mail-in ballots, means the system is engineered to make fraud impossible to prove. Everyone knows that you can barely get through your week without showing ID for the most banal activities, like shopping at Costco. The only reason to ban ID is to hide massive voter fraud.

@GayRepublicSwag Why would you feel the need to announce this? Who cares who you're following? Have you announced any other unfolllws?

Hello… my name is David and I have a major announcement. I didn’t want to have to do this but he has left me absolutely no choice. After years of following… the time has come for me to unfollow Tucker Carlson. I thought he could be saved but it is clear that I was wrong. He has fallen off so hard. He is truly lost. He blames Israel for everything and it is very sad to watch. I held on to hope because I used to really think he was a patriot who loved America. I just can’t see him that way anymore. @TuckerCarlson is in decline and it is just… so very sad. Tucker… I hope you find the healing you need.

@MajToure By what standard? A legal one? No. A human one? Where we're all animals and nature goes by different rules? ......Probably.

Someone SAYS they’re going to kill you and wishes death on you repeatedly. They say this publicly FOR YEARS. You go to where they are and kill them… Is it justified?

Dr. Thomas Seyfried: Cancer is a mitochondrial metabolic disease, not primarily genetic "Every cancer cell ferments glucose and glutamine—the two fuels it can't live without. Mutations are downstream; the root is damaged energy production in mitochondria."" Press-Pulse strategy: Press glucose down (ketogenic), pulse glutamine (with repurposed drugs like mebendazole/fenbendazole). Tumor cells starve while healthy cells thrive on ketones/fatty acids. This could transform treatment—less toxic, more effective—if medical schools embrace metabolic therapy over outdated poisons." Groundbreaking insight that challenges everything we thought we knew.

We don’t live in a democracy if our elected leaders fail to implement the will of the people

UMBILICAL CORD TRUTH They cut those cords KNOWING they are jam-packed full of stem cells! Then they try to sell those stem cells back. We are not meant to cut and clamp umbilical cords. Cord circulation continues for 30+ minutes after birth meaning for over 30 minutes, stem cells, blood, and vital nutrients are meant to be pumping into the baby. When the cord is clamped right away, the child usually gasps for air because they are receiving oxygen from the cord. This is why babies can be born underwater and not drown, as they don't need to use their lungs right away. Letting the cord detach on its own, like all animals in the wild, allows for maximum stem cell and blood transfusion to the baby, leading to healthier, more developed babies. ~ Mr. Hidden History ✨🙌🏽💫

@MadelaineLucyH Thats not true at all. Chicago & Denver are 2 places i can think of off the top of my head that do late term abortion & don't require an emergency for the baby or risk to the mother. There are actually 2 in CO, both make clear on their sites that their policy is "any reason."

(Obviously, late stage abortions ONLY occur in situations where the fetus is not viable or the mother is at serious risk of fatality and injury.) I find these posts very revealing of the ignorance of the anti-abortion lobby. No woman feels 'empowered' by having to have an abortion after 9 months of carrying her child. It's not something anyone does because they didn't get round to ending a pregnancy for nearly a year. The biggest category for late stage abortions? When the fetus has died and is septic, or the mother is a child and unable to safely give birth or undergo caesarean. This is a far right fantasy of the 'monstrous corrupt woman'.

@carvincannabis @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD People like you who defend and deny at all costs are so strange. Why are you incapable of accepting that it isn't all roses and good vibes? ALL substances, even natural ones, harm some users. It's not a magic plant. You'd rather insult someone than see reality, and it's weird.

@AbsurdNarrative @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD The literature is consistent across WHO, NIDA, and psychiatric research. Cannabis is a contributing risk factor and trigger, not a sole independent cause of psychotic disorders. Calling me wrong doesn't change reality.

Two hits. That's all it took. Bryn Spejcher tried cannabis for the first time, took two hits of a high potency product, and within minutes believed she was in hell and had to kill someone to escape. She stabbed her boyfriend 108 times and remembers none of it. The court called it cannabis-induced psychotic disorder. The judge said she had no control. This is not hypothetical. This happened. Cannabis doubles your risk of violence in the general population. In psychiatric patients it's 2.5 times higher. That's not my opinion. That's a systematic review of 51 studies covering 200,000 people. The data exists. We just aren't talking about it.

@carvincannabis @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD We aren't talking about psych disorders. Phenergan also is known to cause hallucinations&delusions. It's an anti nausea drug, & the reaction is known as a side effect,not a disorder. I know you understand this simple concept. You're pretending not to & calling it something else.

@carvincannabis @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD There are psychotic disorders, & there are effects during use. Im healthy. But if I smoke weed, I believe im reading the minds of the people on TV. I hear voices. The last time was 17 years ago. I'm still good to go with no psychosis otherwise. I'm sorry, you're just wrong.

@AbsurdNarrative @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD Cannabis doesn’t create psychotic disorders out of nowhere. What it can do is trigger or accelerate psychosis in people who are already vulnerable. That’s a risk factor, not a root cause. Also don't buy the narrative in the story,

@BunnyandThorton @MrRunon @BasedSamParker Oh boy. 😆😆😆

@AbsurdNarrative @MrRunon @BasedSamParker i was way ahead of Charlie and was waiting for him to "catch up" with reality.

One thing (of many) that has bothered me about the Charlie Kirk narrative was his lack of "success" with women. Stay with me here. Charlie Kirk was a 6'5" athlete, with a good intellect & normie-tier politics. Maybe not the best looking guy, but it's not like his cupboard was bare. Women like tall men of influence. He basically spent about 7 years at a single guy hanging around exclusively college kids, becoming the most popular college influencer in America & building real power. The guy was friends with many powerful, rich, connected people. He was the ideal man for legions of women. He should have had girls THROWING themselves at him. He should have had his pick of women. We should have heard stories about who Charlie Kirk was dating. Gossip. Rumors. Etc. He was a certified, bona-fide 20s-something American hero celebrity. But that's not how it all went down. Instead, we heard there were no girlfriends. That he was a virgin until Erika (good for him if true, btw). No sexual encounters, whatsoever—which, if the rumors about many others in TPUSA are to be believed—is extremely anomalous! He was allegedly surrounded by all kinds of people who were sexually active—gay and straight alike! TPUSA is filled with college coeds for its ambassadors. Smart girls, hot girls, motivated girls, calculating girls, politically connected girls, etc. Girls with multiple combinations of those traits. Yet Charlie spurned every single one? Couldn't land even one single girlfriend? Didn't have one fling? Never once got his groove on? Never once succumbed to the horde of women beating down his door? And then, when he did get married at 27, it was to a 32-year old woman. No offense, ladies, but I was once in my 20s. And men in their mid 20s see women in their 30s as ancient. Old as the hills. Washed up. Why marry a 32-year old when you can snag a 22-year old? That's like a 10-year warranty! This is how the vast majority of men in their 20s think. And Charlie had no shortage of access to women in their early 20s. It's weird. And on top of that, the woman he married hadn't been able to maintain a relationship herself into her 30s. That alone is a major red flag for men. Not to mention the many alleged lies she's told. IMO, she lies a lot. About everything. Surely Charlie would have picked up on that. It's really unattractive. People say Charlie had no game. But the "Bob's Burgers" story where he straight up told her he wanted to date her, not hire her, was a total Chad move. I'm sorry, but something about the Charlie Kirk story just isn't adding up for me. I honestly don't know what, but the math ain't mathing. Am I the only one?

Here's a health bombshell: Most cases of acid reflux, heartburn, and indigestion are NOT caused by too much stomach acid. In reality, these problems are often caused by a LACK of properly acidic stomach acid. Your stomach needs to be extremely acidic to break down protein, kill microbes, and absorb vital minerals. If your stomach acid isn't acidic enough, it can't do its job, leading to a cascade of digestive issues. Mainstream medications like antacids and PPIs actually worsen the problem by further reducing your stomach acid, leading to a vicious cycle and potential nutrient deficiencies. They treat the symptom, but they don't fix the root cause. This is why the labels often say not to take them for more than a few weeks, but many people take them for years, leading to more serious issues like magnesium deficiency, bone problems, and kidney issues.

The company behind all those pink ribbons, the Susan G. Komen Foundation, uses less than a dime of each dollar to actually look for a cure.

@contemptuousbmf @BasedSamParker Yes!! These women are scammers. Con people. They have a better understanding than everyone else about what someone needs and how to give it to them in order to earn trust. Scary.

I know women like her and they can even seduce me with their charm and flattery. I’m not sure how they morally live with themselves. Even women who are not hot, like my dad’s stupid girlfriend, are completely dependent on men and tricking them out of their money. My dad kept this woman for over 20 years and they rarely hung out for a good 15 of those years. He just sent her money, as he said to me, “to stay away from him”. She was a complete psycho, but in the end, he still chose to hang out with her. I’m not sure I will ever understand how that game is played.

Trees release invisible chemicals into the air to protect themselves from bugs and disease. Turns out those same chemicals also switch on your body's cancer-fighting cells. They're called natural killer cells. They're a type of white blood cell that patrols your bloodstream looking for cancer cells and virus-infected cells. When they find one, they punch a hole through its outer wall and inject proteins that force the cell to self-destruct from the inside. You're born with them. Unlike most of your immune system, they don't need to be "trained" on a specific threat first. They just attack anything that looks wrong. The 50% number in this tweet comes from Dr. Qing Li at Nippon Medical School in Tokyo, who has been studying the effects of forests on the human body since 2004. His original 2007 study took 12 men on a 3-day, 2-night forest trip, walking two hours a day. Blood tests showed 11 of 12 had roughly 50% more cancer-killing cell activity afterward. A follow-up with 13 female nurses found the same thing. But the part the tweet leaves out: the boost didn't vanish when they went home. It lasted over 7 days in both groups, and in men, it was still detectable in blood work 30 days later. Li's conclusion is that one forest trip per month could keep these cells running at a higher level year-round. The obvious next question is whether it's the forest itself or just the vacation. Li tested this directly. A separate group took a city tourist trip with the same amount of walking. No boost to killer cells. No stress hormone drop. Zero effect. Then he ran an even more controlled test: 12 men stayed in a regular Tokyo hotel room for three nights while a humidifier pumped tree oil (from Japanese cypress) into the air overnight. Their killer cells still went up. Their stress hormones still dropped. That isolates the cause to those tree chemicals, called phytoncides. Pine, cedar, and cypress trees release the most. These chemicals were found in forest air but were nearly absent in city air. A 2021 lab study showed that one of these tree chemicals directly switches on killer cells and slows colon tumor growth in mice. The bigger picture connects these cells directly to cancer risk. An 11-year study published in The Lancet (one of the world's top medical journals) tracked 3,625 Japanese people and found that those with weaker natural killer cells developed cancer at significantly higher rates. A separate study screening for bowel cancer found that people with low killer cell levels were 7 times more likely to be diagnosed. Li's own research across all 47 regions of Japan showed that areas with less forest had higher cancer death rates for lung, breast, uterine, prostate, kidney, and colon cancers, even after accounting for differences in smoking rates and wealth. The caveats: Li's original studies used small groups (12 and 13 people), and the regional data show a pattern but don't directly prove that forests prevent cancer. No large-scale clinical trial has confirmed that yet. But the chain is consistent: trees release chemicals, those chemicals wake up the cells in your blood that kill cancer, the effect lasts weeks, not hours, and people with more active killer cells get cancer less often. Japan now has 65 government-certified Forest Therapy sites across the country, each tested and approved based on the physical effects they have on visitors.

@dantypo They've already said that, haven't they? That this alone would prevent women and black people from voting, lol.

Dems will tell you the Save Act is problematic for a whole host of reasons. But if Republicans simply stripped it down to “you must present an id to get a ballot, mail-in or in person” the Dems would still vote against it. I know it. You know it. They know it.

Incredible case studies show dietary interventions can dramatically improve mental health conditions. From a woman off antipsychotics for 6 years to schizophrenia patients reversing symptoms with a gluten-free diet, the link is undeniable. #MentalHealth #DietAndHealth #GlutenFree

@carvincannabis @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD And look, in the end, he said I was probably lying about my own experience too,lol. So that's what I was addressing, that it happens at all, not numbers. Maybe it was a mistake to say it's not as uncommon as he wants it to be. That was a poor choice of words for my actual point.

@AbsurdNarrative @Kevin_McKernan @DrJosefWD An individual experience, even a severe one, doesn’t tell us prevalence. That’s exactly why we rely on population data instead of anecdotes.