고정된 트윗
Prof. Brian Keating
23.5K posts

Prof. Brian Keating
@Briankeating
Every great scientist is a storyteller. I interview Nobel winners on @Into_Impossible🎙️ Chancellor's Prof. @UCSanDiego | Pilot | Wrote: Losing the Nobel Prize
👇FLATLAND book+meteorite🪨 👉 가입일 Eylül 2010
129 팔로잉56.4K 팔로워

Full episode coming soon. Subscribe and hit the bell so you don't miss it youtube.com/DrBrianKeating…
English

I made the fatal mistake. I assumed. I assumed "the objects" were here in the 1940s, but are gone now.
@DrBeaVillarroel had to put me in my place:
English
Prof. Brian Keating 리트윗함

@Murry_Rhodes @Briankeating @Into_Impossible This was the first check we did in 2021 for the nine transients :) All other stars were kindly on their place, and these objects never resurfaced :)
English

Just dropped: @ProfAviLoeb on the 40% of recent military UAP reports that still can't be explained — including orbs that seem to spawn smaller orbs. He built the council meant to sort real from noise. Where
do you land? 👇
youtu.be/6bU_T3GGjis

YouTube
Professor Avi Loeb@ProfAviLoeb
The council will report to a higher-level UAP Governance Board that aims to provide guidance, recommendations and coordination at the interagency level, bringing together military, law enforcement, the Intelligence Community, and other civilian agencies.
English


Taken from my Monday M.A.G.I.C. Message
⇨ Subscribe here: @drbriankeating" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">substack.com/@drbriankeating
English

Last week, Mayim Bialik asked me a question that I think every scientist secretly fears:
"What if you're wrong?"
Watch the conversation here 👉️ youtube.com/watch?v=IwFTWT…
If you watched it, leave a comment - I read every one of them. And I’m a co-creator of this video too 😀

YouTube

English

Tomorrow @DrBeaVillarroel joins me on @Into_Impossible. She's spent 7 years pioneering the innovative hunt for astronomical sources that vanish between exposures on 1950s photographic plates... before Sputnik, before any human-made object orbited Earth.
Her 22σ Earth-shadow deficit result is now at the center of one of astronomy's loudest fights.
Avi Loeb suggests they may not be ETI, but more prosaic...cosmic rays that correlate with solar activity, for example. Who do you think is right, and what do YOU want me to ask her?
Drop your questions in the comments below.

English

Yes and honestly I was concerned that there’s no official WH announcement and nothing seems to be forthcoming.
I mentioned my concerns but I didn’t press him hard because he’s a friend and, see above, not a journalist!
Hey, while I have your valuable attention could I ask you the same thing I asked him:
If Rep. Luna and others in government are confident that evidence exists for non-human intelligences, biologics, or alien tech phenomena going back to 1933-1947, what specifically prevents an elected member of Congress (especially the Chairwoman!) from disclosing all or some portion of that evidence publicly?
David Grusch’s situation is understandable given his security clearances and legal obligations. But a sitting member of Congress has constitutional protections, public visibility, financial stability and access to legal counsel.
What is the strongest argument that Rep. Luna cannot release compelling evidence if she believes it exists?
Is the constraint legal, political, evidentiary, or something else entirely?
🙏
English

@Andercot @RokoMijic The US Navy seems to like the portable modular reactors and even their neighbors here in San Diego don’t complain about them…
English

@RokoMijic The argument is if you build thousands of them assembly line style then they get cheaper over time.
Unfortunately we need thousands of the big ones.
English

Small modular nuclear reactors are a bad idea.
They're a technological solution to a political problem (too much regulation of nuclear power).
Nuclear reactors want to be big, because of the scaling of surface area and volume: you want more volume per unit surface area because surface area is a cost.
Douglas Carswell🇬🇧🇺🇸@DouglasCarswell
Can’t help thinking that which design of the new mini reactors we settle on is one of the big issues of our age
English

@shellenberger @ProfAviLoeb I’m glad you asked him. I’m just a scientist, not a journalist like you. But I know enough about DC to know that no budget + no access = no authority
English

@Briankeating @ProfAviLoeb The way he described it made it seem official.
English

.@ProfAviLoeb just confirmed to me by phone that his UAP advisory board will not have access to any classified information and has no legal authority.
Christopher Sharp@ChrisUKSharp
So at first, we thought it was one UAP Science Advisory Council. But it is actually a UFO Board supported by several advisory groups - one of which seems to be the Science Council.
English

@shellenberger @ProfAviLoeb He told me the same thing…24 hours ago.
Also it has no funding support.
youtu.be/OcYtO3OmyP4

YouTube
English

@Bidziil1964 Very cool i didn’t know that even though he’s a friend.
English

@Briankeating Jordan Peterson pioneered your statement: "A scientist handed "do you believe in X?" has exactly one dignified move, and it is to refuse the grammar of the question." Peterson implemented your advice perfectly when asked if he believes in God. It's been done.
English

Michio Kaku Went Viral On Diary of a CEO; I Had To Fact-Check
Timestamps:
00:00 Quantum computers and capitalism collapse
01:23 What quantum computing actually can and can't do
03:39 String theory and the Theory of Everything
06:16 Who really said "read the mind of God"
09:40 Tabby Star: aliens or something boring?
13:45 11 dimensions: prediction or math requirement
18:19 Is dark matter made of string vibrations?
23:03 The multiverse bubble bath — poetry or physics
28:39 Wormholes vs. black holes: not very similar
34:22 Simulation theory and Kaku's "Option Four"
37:37 Verdict: great communicator, bad epistemics
English

