Criminal Law and Philosophy Journal

More from Online First: Michael Moore responds to comments on his Mechanical Choices from List, Sifferd, Tadros, Kaiserman, Sartorio, and Swenson. link.springer.com/article/10.100…

New on Online First: Marie Newhouse reviews Emanuela Ceva and Maria Paola Ferretti, Political Corruption: The Internal Enemy of Public Institutions. Find it open access here: link.springer.com/article/10.100… (PS, we are slowly transitioning to Bluesky)

Of possible interest to followers of this account, a public seminar and book launch for Criminology as a Moral Science. Details, including Zoom registration, here: buff.ly/48XoPnP

New issue alert! Volume 17, issue 3: buff.ly/48TnJcW A special edition on Policing and Political Philosophy edited by @sgaloob & Jake Monaghan. Also, standing to punish by @benjaminsyost, @HadassaNoorda on imprisonment, and Jacob Bronsther on the law of war.

P.S. We are now on blue sky (clphjournal dot bsky dot social), and we'll be transitioning our account over the next few months.

New issue alert! Volume 17, issue 3: buff.ly/48TnJcW A special edition on Policing and Political Philosophy edited by @sgaloob & Jake Monaghan. Also, standing to punish by @benjaminsyost, @HadassaNoorda on imprisonment, and Jacob Bronsther on the law of war.

Just published! A bumper new edition of Criminal Law and Philosophy. 300 pages of articles, reviews, and a symposium on Kim Brownlee's Being Sure of Each Other. Too much to list here. All the details: buff.ly/45AtMRT

Legal philosophers: note these calls for abstracts from our friends at @cambridgeltdg and @EdLegalTheory 👇👇👇

The Call for Abstracts for our #LegalTheory seminar series in academic year 2023/24 is still open. We've extended the deadline to Wednesday 19th April (in light of the industrial action). We're looking forward to hearing from you - and please retweet!

"Is there some interesting sense in which criminal law is either exceptional or distinctive, as compared to other types of law?... Is criminal law theorising sometimes vitiated by an exceptionalism that treats criminal law as exceptional?" Find out here: buff.ly/3zjiZNj

Alice Ristroph, Christoph Burchard, Rocio Lorca @LorcaFerreccio, Antony Duff & Sandra Marshall, @matt_matravers, @JWilenmann, and Francesco Viganò.

More from the new issue buff.ly/3zjiZNj. Each paper in the symposium on exceptionalism includes a final discussion section, in which authors respond to the other contributors’ initial papers. Contributors include 🧵

New issue alert!! A special issue on criminal law exceptionalism edited by Burchard & Duff with eight papers. Five more original papers, six book reviews, and three of our first hard copy PhD Abstracts. Stay tuned for more about each. Issue here: buff.ly/3zjiZNj

Excited about this new paper dropping today! This is me working out a lot of basic issues in criminal law theory that have been bugging me for a long time. TL;DR below👇 doi.org/10.1007/s11572…

New, online first: @benjaminsyost casts doubt on the approach to unjust states that rests on their losing "standing" to punish. Abstract in the photo. "Standing to Punish the Disadvantaged" here buff.ly/3VkjOih.

On November 10, we will launch this great book in Cambridge. It makes a good case for re-reading Beccaria, one of the most influential philosophers of crime and punishment; and so much more bloomsbury.com/uk/rereading-b…

Hey authors! Did you know u can create a link to share access to your article with no pay-wall? Check it out! ow.ly/TPB150LgEF7

New online, open access: Hadassa Noorda, “Imprisonment”. “What matters, in deciding what legal safeguards individuals should have against what kinds of state imposition, is how severely a measure impacts on the normal life of those subjected to it.” buff.ly/3yLt6um

#TBT Our first Throwback Thursday tweet was on 24/09/20. It celebrated Vol 1, Issue 1, Paper 1. Two years and 300-ish tweets later, we've caught up. We're not sure what we'll do next (ideas?), but what you should do is read our current issue: buff.ly/3DWFjzL

#TBT (3/3) 16/2(2022). A special issue on Hirstein, @KSifferd and Fagan’s Responsible Brains: Neuroscience, Law, and Human Culpability. @CraigAgule, Coppola @FedericaUni, Husak, Moore, Morse, & Patterson comment with replies by the authors. All here: buff.ly/3N7ndf5