Andy Stapleton

2.3K posts

Andy Stapleton

Andy Stapleton

@D4Andy

가입일 Mayıs 2013
16 팔로잉74 팔로워
ZeroYear
ZeroYear@ZeroYear2040·
@D4Andy @RupertLowe10 @SuellaBraverman UN countries. You know the ones that are law abiding and follow international law. That your wanna leader Rupert once to remove is from. WOW you people are so gullible!
English
1
0
0
96
ZeroYear
ZeroYear@ZeroYear2040·
@RupertLowe10 @SuellaBraverman If you do that Rupert, then the UN will deport every British citizen living in their country back to the UK. That is 5.5 million people. You truly are making it up as you go along.
English
93
1
19
7.8K
Derek Domino
Derek Domino@does_derek·
Why a 5 yr old Child has more sense than our Politicians !!
English
11
71
229
2.5K
James Freeman
James Freeman@james_freeman__·
What is more important, whether Andy Burnham wins Makerfield or not, or settling the question of which party should lead the right? One of Reform UKs main campaign messages in the Makerfield bi-election is that voting for Restore Britain or the Conservatives will split the vote on the right and lead to Labour’s Andy Burnham winning the seat. The argument goes on to say that if Burnham wins, he will go on to win a Labour leadership contest, become prime minister, and this will reinvigorate the Labour Party making it more likely they will win the next general election. The first thing to note is that this argument contains so many assumptions that it renders it ridiculous. Yes, Burnham might indeed become prime minister, but that is as far as it goes before breaking down. Firstly, because it is just as likely as not, that Burnham would make similar mistakes to Starmer, or even worse ones, if he does indeed become prime minister. This argument is particularly strong given the likelihood that Burnham will need to please the left of the party, which will undoubtably lead to more economic destruction caused by even higher taxation. ‘It’s the economy stupid’ always wins out in the end. There is of course also the argument that says wouldn’t it be better if Andy Burnham did become prime minister if he does a better job than Starmer. You know, because putting country before party should be what we all strive for. Or that the alternative challengers for prime minister if Burnham loses the bi-election would be even worse than either Starmer or Burnham! The main point is that Labour has another three years in power regardless of who wins the Makerfield bi-election so isn’t it more important for those on the political right to settle on which party is best placed to lead the right and form a government that is capable of making the difficult changes the country so desperately needs. For these reasons it is surely more important to unify the right than for the right to win Makerfield, and that the only way to do this given the personalities involved, and the history between them, is for people to vote for the party they want to form the next government; and not to vote based upon which party they are being told is the only one able to achieve that. To me this seems like the only sensible approach for those on the right, because if the real goal is to get a radical right leaning party into government, then it stands to reason that settling the question over which party everyone should rally behind is more important in the long run than whether Burnham wins in Makerfield or not. I therefore urge voters in Makerfield to vote for the party they would like to see in government, regardless of what they’re being told is the likelihood of this happening. @RestoreBritain @reformparty_uk
James Freeman tweet mediaJames Freeman tweet media
English
88
54
239
28.5K
Andy Stapleton
Andy Stapleton@D4Andy·
@paul_rams34 @james_freeman__ Hey Paul As Restore is just getting started. I suggest that you drink more water 💦💦💦 that way you can cry harder 😭😭😭 🤣🤣🤣
English
0
0
0
3
Paul
Paul@paul_rams34·
@james_freeman__ Repeat after me, Freeman. I don't care. Now get lost. 🎯😂
English
1
0
3
25
Paul
Paul@paul_rams34·
I have no interest whats so ever in anything you say or do Freeman. You are an absolute disgrace to this country every bit as damaging as Habib and Lowe. Kindly clear off, remove yourself from the conversation, and spare us your input. You are right at home.. Read on
James Freeman@james_freeman__

What is more important, whether Andy Burnham wins Makerfield or not, or settling the question of which party should lead the right? One of Reform UKs main campaign messages in the Makerfield bi-election is that voting for Restore Britain or the Conservatives will split the vote on the right and lead to Labour’s Andy Burnham winning the seat. The argument goes on to say that if Burnham wins, he will go on to win a Labour leadership contest, become prime minister, and this will reinvigorate the Labour Party making it more likely they will win the next general election. The first thing to note is that this argument contains so many assumptions that it renders it ridiculous. Yes, Burnham might indeed become prime minister, but that is as far as it goes before breaking down. Firstly, because it is just as likely as not, that Burnham would make similar mistakes to Starmer, or even worse ones, if he does indeed become prime minister. This argument is particularly strong given the likelihood that Burnham will need to please the left of the party, which will undoubtably lead to more economic destruction caused by even higher taxation. ‘It’s the economy stupid’ always wins out in the end. There is of course also the argument that says wouldn’t it be better if Andy Burnham did become prime minister if he does a better job than Starmer. You know, because putting country before party should be what we all strive for. Or that the alternative challengers for prime minister if Burnham loses the bi-election would be even worse than either Starmer or Burnham! The main point is that Labour has another three years in power regardless of who wins the Makerfield bi-election so isn’t it more important for those on the political right to settle on which party is best placed to lead the right and form a government that is capable of making the difficult changes the country so desperately needs. For these reasons it is surely more important to unify the right than for the right to win Makerfield, and that the only way to do this given the personalities involved, and the history between them, is for people to vote for the party they want to form the next government; and not to vote based upon which party they are being told is the only one able to achieve that. To me this seems like the only sensible approach for those on the right, because if the real goal is to get a radical right leaning party into government, then it stands to reason that settling the question over which party everyone should rally behind is more important in the long run than whether Burnham wins in Makerfield or not. I therefore urge voters in Makerfield to vote for the party they would like to see in government, regardless of what they’re being told is the likelihood of this happening. @RestoreBritain @reformparty_uk

English
6
2
10
1.6K
WarMonitor🇺🇦🇬🇧
Rioters in Belfast are now directly confronting the Police throwing missiles are close range it appears to be getting more violent...
English
907
2.1K
24.1K
1.7M
Andy Stapleton
Andy Stapleton@D4Andy·
@Tommy_NCUK @mindrelic @TRobinsonNewEra Voting doesn't work, peaceful protest doesn't work, violent protest doesn't work, singing "don't look back in anger" doesn't work, asking nicely doesn't work. Any ideas Tommytomtom ? Unfortunately the government not listening because perhaps they want violence?
English
0
0
1
14
Just Dawn
Just Dawn@dawndavis54·
Remember Patriots, a Reform voter today will be a Restore Britain voter in the end….be kind
Just Dawn tweet media
English
5
17
41
387
John berry🇬🇧
John berry🇬🇧@Johnber39647281·
@james_freeman__ You would think this would really set off alarm bells among the reform base. Sadly it won't. Most were only just recently Boris fanatics.
English
1
1
3
1.1K
Clandestine
Clandestine@WarClandestine·
What’s happening in California is nothing new. It’s the same playbook they used to steal 2020. First they send out mass mail-in ballots, to everyone, even those who didn’t request them, and dead people still on the voter rolls. Then they harvest all these floating ballots. Then they delay counting for day/weeks, in deep blue counties they control, so they can continue to ship all these fraudulent mail-in ballots to the tabulation center, until they have enough to steal the election. And that’s how it’s done. Completely untraceable election fraud. This is why the Dems don’t want voter ID. It’s why they don’t want paper ballots. It’s why they don’t want same-day elections. It’s why they don’t want to clean up voter rolls. This is how just a few deep blue counties in swing states, are able to overturn entire state and federal elections. This is why securing elections is so important, whether that be via the SAVE America Act, or some sort of executive action. Until this problem is solved, we do not have a nation.
Clandestine tweet media
English
147
1.5K
4.4K
47.3K
Andy Stapleton 리트윗함
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
A picture paints a thousand words.
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
290
6.8K
33.2K
303.3K