
Andy Stapleton
2.3K posts




🚨🚨🚨 I said months ago Restore were in Conservatives pocket and I got leathered with abuse by people. Now The Spectator reports: “Kemi Badenoch admitted she already has a casual arrangement with Rupert Lowe, the leader of Restore Britain, who took a Tory seat on the public accounts committee.”





@james_freeman__ And they both left the Tory party because the establishment would not let them do what was necessary.







What is more important, whether Andy Burnham wins Makerfield or not, or settling the question of which party should lead the right? One of Reform UKs main campaign messages in the Makerfield bi-election is that voting for Restore Britain or the Conservatives will split the vote on the right and lead to Labour’s Andy Burnham winning the seat. The argument goes on to say that if Burnham wins, he will go on to win a Labour leadership contest, become prime minister, and this will reinvigorate the Labour Party making it more likely they will win the next general election. The first thing to note is that this argument contains so many assumptions that it renders it ridiculous. Yes, Burnham might indeed become prime minister, but that is as far as it goes before breaking down. Firstly, because it is just as likely as not, that Burnham would make similar mistakes to Starmer, or even worse ones, if he does indeed become prime minister. This argument is particularly strong given the likelihood that Burnham will need to please the left of the party, which will undoubtably lead to more economic destruction caused by even higher taxation. ‘It’s the economy stupid’ always wins out in the end. There is of course also the argument that says wouldn’t it be better if Andy Burnham did become prime minister if he does a better job than Starmer. You know, because putting country before party should be what we all strive for. Or that the alternative challengers for prime minister if Burnham loses the bi-election would be even worse than either Starmer or Burnham! The main point is that Labour has another three years in power regardless of who wins the Makerfield bi-election so isn’t it more important for those on the political right to settle on which party is best placed to lead the right and form a government that is capable of making the difficult changes the country so desperately needs. For these reasons it is surely more important to unify the right than for the right to win Makerfield, and that the only way to do this given the personalities involved, and the history between them, is for people to vote for the party they want to form the next government; and not to vote based upon which party they are being told is the only one able to achieve that. To me this seems like the only sensible approach for those on the right, because if the real goal is to get a radical right leaning party into government, then it stands to reason that settling the question over which party everyone should rally behind is more important in the long run than whether Burnham wins in Makerfield or not. I therefore urge voters in Makerfield to vote for the party they would like to see in government, regardless of what they’re being told is the likelihood of this happening. @RestoreBritain @reformparty_uk









🚨BREAKING: REFORM UK'S ROBERT JENRICK PROUD TO WELCOME SUDANESE ATTACKER INTO UK Just one month after the vile Belfast attacker entered the UK in September 2023 Reform UK's Robert Jenrick made a recorded statement saying: "The UK is proud to have welcomed Sudanese nationals through our UK resettlement scheme " The recorded praising of Sudanese entering the UK including the attacker in Belfast appears in the parliament Hansard record They have their hands all over this














