Cory

Commissum Divinitus, Pope Gregory XVI: "[T]he Church has, by its divine institution, the power of the magisterium to teach and define matters of faith and morals and to interpret the Holy Scriptures without danger of [pernicious] error."

@ConceptualJames Pope Benedict XV + ratio

@SatisCognitum07 @TradCatTaylor The article in question is talking about the consecrations of Des Lauriers in comparison to the consecrations of Lefebvre. In context, it is not talking about totalist consecrations. Furthermore, Bp. Sanborn is correct about SOME, not all, forms of totalism.

@DTCory @TradCatTaylor See below.

Well, there you have it. Blocked for calling out hypocrisy. He said it is insane that totalists say the thesis is heretical, but I pointed out that Bp. Gerard called totalists schismatics. This is simply revolting behavior. Behavior of those unable to hold together a dying error

@kennhistoria @TradCatTaylor @NovusOrdoWatch

@NovusOrdoWatch Sedevacantists to the SSPX

"Cardinal Victor Manuel Fernández has prepared a declaration of schism should the Society of St. Pius X proceed with episcopal consecrations in Écône on July 1. The Vatican is also making pastoral arrangements to welcome those who may leave the SSPX after it ordains new bishops without papal permission." dianemontagna.substack.com/p/report-vatic…

@timelessfaithh Bruh.

The Vatican II documents are some of the most beautiful I've ever read. At times I had to stop to reread and reflect. That's how profound they are.

@Patrick30887310 I think he said he's stepping away from being a priest.

Friendly reminder that if you see this guy on here, please note that he is NOT an actual Catholic priest, he is part of some other religious sect not associated or in good standing with the real Catholic Church

@realDaveReilly I would like the middle two to have valid priests.

Just wanna put something out there for the Catholic Trad crowd… The SSPX is a *priestly* society. The FSSP is a *priestly* society. The ICK is a *priestly* society. CMRI is a *priestly* society. We need something for the *lay people* who just want to be Catholic, build businesses and raise children. There is a LOT of infighting between the different factions, and while there are real differences & problems that need to be addressed, I simply don’t think [insert priestly group] is the biggest problem we face in civil society today. Inflation, immigration, war, and AI are threatening to completely erase the world that we were born into, decimating entire communities, economies, etc. I am (and hope you are) willing to work with ANYONE who professes the Catholic faith, to the best of their knowledge and ability, whether they go to the Novus Ordo, Indult, Sede, SSPX etc, and I think there are a lot of people out there who agree. The Boomers had the luxury of going their own way, but Millennials and younger simply aren’t going to make it on our own. We need each other. We need to work together. We need to act COLLECTIVELY. I’m not saying that Trads need to go to the Novus Ordo, or that the Novus Ordo needs to go to the Latin Mass. I’m just saying that for the sake of our children, we need to find ways to heal the division and work together to build a better world than the one we inherited. The disunity that has come about in the wake of the spiritual nuclear bomb that was the 60’s (exacerbated by social media) is a CURSE, a scourge on the Catholic laity. We need to find ways to meet each other where we are, work together, and build for the future (instead of waiting for the “imminent” chastisement/days of darkness etc). There will be people who claim SSPX’ers are “schismatic.” There will be trads who call everyone who goes to the Novus Ordo “modernists.” Let them. Nobody’s gonna stop them. But don’t let them stop YOU from coming together, with your neighbors, in Charity & with Hope, that we can build a better future. If this weird preachy rant resonates with you, I’d sincerely encourage you to reach out to the @CatholicLand Movement. I think they’re working on something truly excellent, and that this endeavor can help us lay people overcome the challenges the modern world has in store for us... /end rant/ (may delete later)

@JimmytheHunj @FrLavery @TradCathSermons Sounds like he has an illness.

@DTCory @FrLavery @TradCathSermons What's the reason for the delay ?

Just arrived at Mary Immaculate Queen Church in Omaha where we will have two new priests and two deacons ordained tomorrow morning from Mater Dei Seminary. They will not be "sacrament machines." They will be pastors of souls, truly caring for souls with whatever mission and jurisdiction is necessary granted from Christ by the tacit will of the Popes as willed by Christ. Lest souls should perish! So many memories here. I was ordained here almost 23 years ago. O bone Jesu, fac ut sint sacerdotes secundum Cor tuum!

@CtreRevolution @AsTheRain1 I suppose the more correct language is that he claims to be a carmelite. I don't know if he has the ability to be a true Carmelite. He certainly is a religious.

@DTCory @AsTheRain1 Why do you say Frei Tiago"claims" to be a religious. Can you explain? Now that you have made these statements, it seems to me it would be necessary and charitable for everyone to be more specific.We should know if something has to be known.

Frei Tiago is someone to be avoided, and he has been for some time even before these unfortunate statements.

@AsTheRain1 The avoidance was given by clergy, even before today. Thus far, no one has told me to avoid you. Also, a clergyman telling me to avoid someone who claims to be a religious is someone I am going to avoid.

@DTCory That might be true, but you haven't given any reason for your statement. I never heard of him before today. But I do know that I myself have been marked by several Thesis clergy as "someone to be avoided" based on the fact that they blocked me. So grain of salt, and all that...

@StephenKokx @BigModernism Or anything at this bookstore: eocbookstore.com

@FrLavery From my interactions with him, I don't know if he's actually a Feeneyite. He certainly has many "irrational" positions that make it hard to understand what he is trying to say.

A related matter: What is presented in this video is precisely what I and others have been saying the Anglophone rhetoric has been pointing towards: x.com/TheWMReview/st… I have been told that this is an unjustified inference. But I posed this question directly to @FrLavery, and he has on seven occasions refused to give a simple yes/no answer, or to confirm or deny that this inference was correct. 1. x.com/TheWMReview/st… 2. x.com/TheWMReview/st… 3. x.com/TheWMReview/st… 4. x.com/TheWMReview/st… 5. x.com/TheWMReview/st… 6. x.com/TheWMReview/st… 7. x.com/TheWMReview/st… I believe that these questions have been asked in a respectful way towards Father Lavery throughout. But the persistence arises from from Father having questioned my own honesty for raising this point (among several other insults throughout this discussion) when he asked for evidence of clergy making such claims. x.com/FrLavery/statu… I provided this evidence, pointing Father to his own words, and those, unfortunately, of the good Bishop Roy whom I and many others admire. x.com/TheWMReview/st… It is now also amply demonstrated by this video. Four of the times that I asked Father were after I had fulfilled, in good faith, the condition which he laid down for answering the question (namely, stating my own opinion on a separate but related matter, which I wrote up in an article). wmreview.org/p/the-status-o… In response, Father said that he had already answered the question: x.com/FrLavery/statu… He later said that he needed to take longer to reply to my article. x.com/FrLavery/statu… But the question, now asked seven times without answer, was not about my article. It was a simple yes or no, confirm or deny question about whether or not those who fail to accept his views will be construed as schismatic, and whether his allusions and rhetoric were pointing in that direction. Here are the questions which I asked: 'Do you think that one can resolutely (or you could say "obstinately" or even "pertinaciously") reject of the ideas you advocate re jurisdiction, an IGC and the election of a pope, without thereby becoming or showing oneself to be a schismatic, in the way that Benedict XIII did?' 'Again, if you disagree with what they are saying, which I believe is being drawn from your interventions, would you care to be clear that one can resolutely disagree with your ideas and so on, without thereby becoming a schismatic? Would you care to correct someone like [redacted], who commented below, suggesting that those who disagree with your plans have their hearts clouded by pride?' I later distilled the question even further: "I simply asked you whether you hold, or are preparing to hold, that those who "obstinately" disagree with your theories and any eventual plan to elect a pope, show themselves to be a schismatic." Note that these questions abstract from which is the correct position on the matter. Lest it be thought that these questions are overly demanding – aside from the need to respond to an accusation of dishonesty and other slurs – I reminded Fr Lavery of his own words to me on Christmas Eve 2025: "It would be wonderful if you would give a straightforward "yes" or "no" to that question [...] If you cannot give me a simple yes or no to at least that question, then I think it is rather disingenuous for you to keep saying that people have wrongly criticized you for not clarifying your position." x.com/FrLavery/statu… I am, however, losing hope in receiving a simple yes or no answer. But I think it is clear that the refusal to answer indicates that the inferences within those questions were correct. "Silence implies consent." However, twelve days after the first question, I am renewing my questions for the eighth and final time. As I stated earlier today on another tweet: "If I am wrong [in what I am inferring from the discussion, and have asked to be confirmed or denied], and Fr Lavery clearly answers the question, then I will believe him." 👇

Bad look for Thesis Inc. 🤧

@ChrisxCrash92 Sede Inc checking in, I did not approve this transfer.

Sede Inc is Dead Long live Sede 501 (c) (3)

@theoscholastica angeluspress.org/collections/ar…

@theoscholastica You gotta read. angeluspress.org/collections/ar…

Is anyone from the SSPX actually gonna give me a good answer to my damn question or not?