Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช

8.7K posts

Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช banner
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช

Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช

@Danny_Diskin

Company owner/Director. Critical thinker. My genuine opinions on politics & social matters. Travel โœˆ๏ธ & hiking โ›ฐ๏ธ

Ireland ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Mart 2025
522 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰350 ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
RTร‰ News
RTร‰ News@rtenewsยท
The annual Digital News Report for Ireland 2026 shows that Irish people continue to trust major news brands, but are losing trust in news more generally rte.ie/news/ireland/2โ€ฆ
English
106
6
10
10.6K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
This is why BlueSky is not on their list list of banned social media platforms for under 16โ€™s in Australia, the UK & when the same ban will be applied to Europe.
Mike Benz@MikeBenzCyber

Iโ€™ve been warning for months about the EUโ€™s insidious long-range plan to build up BlueSky and expand its network partners in preparation for a regulatory ban on X. Theyโ€™re calling it EuroSky, and the goal is to impose a new Iron Curtain.

English
0
0
0
25
Sinn Fรฉin
Sinn Fรฉin@sinnfeinirelandยท
Declan Lynch has been selected as Sinn Fรฉinโ€™s Lagan Valley candidate for the next Assembly election. Currently, there is no Nationalist MLA in Lagan Valley. You can change that next May. With the new constituency boundaries, and the inclusion of new areas, Sinn Fรฉin can win in Lagan Valley. Letโ€™s do it. Together, letโ€™s win in Lagan Valley. @CllrDeclanLynch
English
55
30
76
6.9K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Tish ๐Ÿงƒ
Tish ๐Ÿงƒ@Tish000238142ยท
An African migrant who was subject to an unenforced deportation order went on to rape an Irish woman. Arthur Bradford who resided on Charleville Road, Rathmines Dublin sentenced to 6.5 years. Another life destroyed by Irelandโ€™s open border policy. breakingnews.ie/ireland/man-whโ€ฆ
Tish ๐Ÿงƒ tweet mediaTish ๐Ÿงƒ tweet media
English
21
194
556
10.3K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Susanne Delaney
Susanne Delaney@SuzieD755164ยท
I'm so tired of these over privileged idiots. She lives in Foxrock, one of the most homogeneous and affluent societies in Ireland. The closest thing to a migrant she sees is her doctor neighbour or the barrister who serves her vegan soy latte. She is exhausting, and was behind the court case the IHREC brought to the Highcourt whereupon they used tax payers money to argue the case that illegal male asylum seekers in tents are having their rights upended and should be paid compensation and be accommodated. That case saw to it that Irish people were pushed beneath male asylum seekers and all asylum seekers when it comes to a right to be accommodated. I don't see @sineadgibney having a shit fit over Road Bouchaker's clearly racist utterings before he stabbed three 5 year olds and a creche worker. "Shit Irish. Shit fucking Irish". We are an ethnicity in our own right.
Irishman@IrishmanIRL

"We live in a racist society, we have to name that and we have to deal with it" says woke Social Democrats TD Sinรฉad Gibney on The Week in Politics

English
45
168
898
18.2K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Electroverse
Electroverse@Electroversenetยท
A large tree trunk has been uncovered beneath a glacier in the Alps, dated to around 6,000 years ago. The species is Swiss stone pine. Today, trees of that type cannot grow at that altitude because it is far too cold. 6,000 years ago aligns with the Holocene climate optimum, a time when temperatures were far higher than now, even with far less atmospheric CO2. Earth's climate is cyclical and Mother Nature self-regulates. Narratives of doom serve political aims, not reality.
English
152
2.5K
8K
172K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
If government truly cared about children there wouldnโ€™t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldnโ€™t be skyrocketing. There would not be over 5k homeless children. Individuals caught in possession of child abuse material would not be given suspended sentences. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. None of this has anything to do with protecting children. Itโ€™s about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information and obviously conservative content platforms are their target given that the extremely left leaning platform BlueSky is not on their list. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass rape of predominantly white British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men for decades so the notion that Kier Starmer is now concerned about children is absolutely Bullshit.
English
3
2
8
122
Virgin Media News
Virgin Media News@VirginMediaNewsยท
The Taoiseach has reacted to the UKโ€™s plan to ban under-16s from major social media platforms. He said the Irish Government will pursue the possibility of an EU-wide ban for under-16s when it assumes the EU Presidency. ๐Ÿ“บ More on Virgin Media PLAY
English
94
6
20
8.7K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
With all due respect Senator you keep referring to the UK government as if they genuinely wish to protect children. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass industrial scale rape & torture of predominantly white teenage British girls by predominantly Pakistani men so the notion that the UK government (or any government for that matter), truly cares about children is a display of willful ignorance
English
0
0
7
109
Senator Rรณnรกn Mullen
Senator Rรณnรกn Mullen@RonanMullenยท
The UKโ€™s proposed ban on Under 16s using social mediaโ€”what this should and shouldnโ€™t mean. Keir Starmer was light on the detail in this morningโ€™s press conference. A ban should mean that anyone under 16 may not have an account with any social media company. Children may go online, use browsers etc, but banning accounts prevents strangers from accessing them and shields them from algorithmic abuse. No personal accounts. Such a ban should also apply to gaming platforms where children can be approached by strangers. The responsibility must be on the social media companies to verify age, with criminal and civil sanctions for failure. It is not for the apparatus of the State, but rather the onus must be on social media providers in compliance with legislation to control access to social media accounts. I oppose any State-sponsored one-for-all digital ID card.
English
48
4
37
4.2K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
If government truly cared about children there wouldnโ€™t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldnโ€™t be skyrocketing. There would not be over 5k homeless children. Individuals caught in possession of child abuse material would not be given suspended sentences. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. None of this has anything to do with protecting children. Itโ€™s about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information and obviously conservative content platforms are their target given that the extremely left leaning platform BlueSky is not on their list. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass rape of predominantly white British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men for decades so the notion that Kier Starmer is now concerned about children is absolutely Bullshit.
English
0
0
2
82
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
If government truly cared about children there wouldnโ€™t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldnโ€™t be skyrocketing. There would not be over 5k home children. Individuals caught in possession of child abuse material would not be given suspended sentences. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. None of this has anything to do with protecting children. Itโ€™s about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information and obviously conservative content platforms are their target given that the extremely left leaning platform BlueSky is not on their list. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass rape of predominantly white British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men for decades so the notion that Kier Starmer is now concerned about children is absolutely Bullshit.
English
0
0
0
40
Virgin Media News
Virgin Media News@VirginMediaNewsยท
The Taoiseach has described social media as โ€œthe public health issue of our timeโ€ as Ireland looks at pursuing an EU-wide ban for under-16s. It comes after UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to ban under-16s from major social media platforms. #TruthMatters
English
11
0
0
1.3K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Alex Armstrong
Alex Armstrong@Alexarmstrongยท
So banning social media for under 16โ€™s is a โ€œmovementโ€? They might as well openly admit that this is part of their coordinated globalist policy agenda, using childrenโ€™s safety as the main justification for expanded surveillance and censorship online.
Alex Armstrong tweet media
English
268
1.3K
4.4K
45.9K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
gript
gript@griptmediaยท
Now FREE to read: CORMAC LUCEY on the Belfast attack: "There is a sentence that no politician will utter, so I will: Import the culture, import the consequences. gript.ie/lucey-on-belfaโ€ฆ
English
19
135
517
13K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
PeterSweden
PeterSweden@PeterSweden7ยท
Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky. Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky. This proves one thing. It's not about protecting children. It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.
English
1.5K
22.1K
90.5K
693.3K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
If government truly cared about children there wouldnโ€™t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldnโ€™t be skyrocketing. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. This is about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information.
English
0
0
0
66
Wolfgang Richter
Wolfgang Richter@WolfgangRichtEUยท
Keir Starmer is finally banning X for children under 16. This is a good first step to eventually ban it for everyone. Controlled speech is the only way we can have a civilized society. Have a wonderful day, Wolfgang
English
7.7K
418
3.3K
530.4K
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
Danny Diskin ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช@Danny_Diskinยท
If government truly cared about children there wouldnโ€™t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldnโ€™t be skyrocketing. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. This has nothing to do with protecting children, its about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information.
English
0
0
0
57
Seรกn Ako ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ช
My first instinct was to support the UKโ€™s social media ban for under 16s. Protecting children from grooming, exploitation and harmful content seems like common sense. But Iโ€™m seeing a lot of opposition to it, so Iโ€™m genuinely curious as to why? One thing making me second guess is that platforms like bluesky are exempt, while at the same time thereโ€™s a push to let 16 year olds vote. To me that looks less like child protection and more like controlling where young people get their information. Interested to hear other perspectives.
English
1.9K
266
3.4K
227K
Max Power
Max Power@DrMaxPowarrยท
I really struggle to understand these @GerryAdamsSF, @GerryCarrollPBP, @pb4p socialist types. The likes of Gerry Adams killed people because unionists took all the good jobs, all the social housing, etc., and they told us they were fighting a just war for our civil rights. Now these socialists invite the billions of surplus humans from around the world (@sinnfeinireland has said there should be no cap on immigration) to be in direct competition with us for jobs, for housing, for schools places, hospital and GP treatment, etc. which drives house prices and rents higher, wages lower, and our health into the gutter. They also cry about climate change and being 'Green' while simultaneously supporting the destruction of our environment and wildlife to build new houses, new sewage and water treatment plants, new power stations, new roads, etc., for the foreign hordes that land on our island each year. Each one that comes is coming for a low consumption society to a high consumption society, which increases our overall consumption of food, fertiliser, gas, electricity, petrol/diesel, causing inflation and more pollution. Our birth rates have been below replacement for 30 years, so these new houses that blight the landscape are not for us. Our birth rates have been below replacement which is where they wanted it with their support of abortions and telling us to have less kids to slow climate change. What is going on inside the heads of these socialists? Are they just regarded hypocrites, or is something more nefarious going on? Are they paid actors of the elites pretending to be socialists?
Max Power tweet media
English
6
31
103
2.4K