Danny Diskin 🇮🇪

The annual Digital News Report for Ireland 2026 shows that Irish people continue to trust major news brands, but are losing trust in news more generally rte.ie/news/ireland/2…

This is why BlueSky is not on their list list of banned social media platforms for under 16’s in Australia, the UK & when the same ban will be applied to Europe.

Declan Lynch has been selected as Sinn Féin’s Lagan Valley candidate for the next Assembly election. Currently, there is no Nationalist MLA in Lagan Valley. You can change that next May. With the new constituency boundaries, and the inclusion of new areas, Sinn Féin can win in Lagan Valley. Let’s do it. Together, let’s win in Lagan Valley. @CllrDeclanLynch

An African migrant who was subject to an unenforced deportation order went on to rape an Irish woman. Arthur Bradford who resided on Charleville Road, Rathmines Dublin sentenced to 6.5 years. Another life destroyed by Ireland’s open border policy. breakingnews.ie/ireland/man-wh…

This is absolutely excellent. It is 15 minutes long but well worth it. The tentacles run deep. Brilliant and diligent. Please share this or bookmark for later.

I'm so tired of these over privileged idiots. She lives in Foxrock, one of the most homogeneous and affluent societies in Ireland. The closest thing to a migrant she sees is her doctor neighbour or the barrister who serves her vegan soy latte. She is exhausting, and was behind the court case the IHREC brought to the Highcourt whereupon they used tax payers money to argue the case that illegal male asylum seekers in tents are having their rights upended and should be paid compensation and be accommodated. That case saw to it that Irish people were pushed beneath male asylum seekers and all asylum seekers when it comes to a right to be accommodated. I don't see @sineadgibney having a shit fit over Road Bouchaker's clearly racist utterings before he stabbed three 5 year olds and a creche worker. "Shit Irish. Shit fucking Irish". We are an ethnicity in our own right.

A large tree trunk has been uncovered beneath a glacier in the Alps, dated to around 6,000 years ago. The species is Swiss stone pine. Today, trees of that type cannot grow at that altitude because it is far too cold. 6,000 years ago aligns with the Holocene climate optimum, a time when temperatures were far higher than now, even with far less atmospheric CO2. Earth's climate is cyclical and Mother Nature self-regulates. Narratives of doom serve political aims, not reality.

@john_mcguirk Stick on a bit of Barbara & chill. The TDS will quickly leave your body 😀

Trump spent hundreds of billions on this war and did not accomplish a single one of his objectives. Not one.

If government truly cared about children there wouldn’t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldn’t be skyrocketing. There would not be over 5k homeless children. Individuals caught in possession of child abuse material would not be given suspended sentences. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. None of this has anything to do with protecting children. It’s about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information and obviously conservative content platforms are their target given that the extremely left leaning platform BlueSky is not on their list. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass rape of predominantly white British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men for decades so the notion that Kier Starmer is now concerned about children is absolutely Bullshit.

The Taoiseach has reacted to the UK’s plan to ban under-16s from major social media platforms. He said the Irish Government will pursue the possibility of an EU-wide ban for under-16s when it assumes the EU Presidency. 📺 More on Virgin Media PLAY

With all due respect Senator you keep referring to the UK government as if they genuinely wish to protect children. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass industrial scale rape & torture of predominantly white teenage British girls by predominantly Pakistani men so the notion that the UK government (or any government for that matter), truly cares about children is a display of willful ignorance

The UK’s proposed ban on Under 16s using social media—what this should and shouldn’t mean. Keir Starmer was light on the detail in this morning’s press conference. A ban should mean that anyone under 16 may not have an account with any social media company. Children may go online, use browsers etc, but banning accounts prevents strangers from accessing them and shields them from algorithmic abuse. No personal accounts. Such a ban should also apply to gaming platforms where children can be approached by strangers. The responsibility must be on the social media companies to verify age, with criminal and civil sanctions for failure. It is not for the apparatus of the State, but rather the onus must be on social media providers in compliance with legislation to control access to social media accounts. I oppose any State-sponsored one-for-all digital ID card.

If government truly cared about children there wouldn’t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldn’t be skyrocketing. There would not be over 5k homeless children. Individuals caught in possession of child abuse material would not be given suspended sentences. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. None of this has anything to do with protecting children. It’s about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information and obviously conservative content platforms are their target given that the extremely left leaning platform BlueSky is not on their list. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass rape of predominantly white British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men for decades so the notion that Kier Starmer is now concerned about children is absolutely Bullshit.

Good news - Ireland is being very negligent on this. Social media is having a devastating impact on our children… bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

Very good article @irishdailymail

If government truly cared about children there wouldn’t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldn’t be skyrocketing. There would not be over 5k home children. Individuals caught in possession of child abuse material would not be given suspended sentences. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. None of this has anything to do with protecting children. It’s about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information and obviously conservative content platforms are their target given that the extremely left leaning platform BlueSky is not on their list. The UK government covered up (& still are) the mass rape of predominantly white British girls by predominantly Pakistani Muslim men for decades so the notion that Kier Starmer is now concerned about children is absolutely Bullshit.

The Taoiseach has described social media as “the public health issue of our time” as Ireland looks at pursuing an EU-wide ban for under-16s. It comes after UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced plans to ban under-16s from major social media platforms. #TruthMatters

So banning social media for under 16’s is a “movement”? They might as well openly admit that this is part of their coordinated globalist policy agenda, using children’s safety as the main justification for expanded surveillance and censorship online.

They are simply lying to you Here’s why……..

Now FREE to read: CORMAC LUCEY on the Belfast attack: "There is a sentence that no politician will utter, so I will: Import the culture, import the consequences. gript.ie/lucey-on-belfa…

Australia banned X for children but not BlueSky. Britain is banning X for children but not BlueSky. This proves one thing. It's not about protecting children. It's about censorship and controlling the narrative.

If government truly cared about children there wouldn’t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldn’t be skyrocketing. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. This is about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information.

Keir Starmer is finally banning X for children under 16. This is a good first step to eventually ban it for everyone. Controlled speech is the only way we can have a civilized society. Have a wonderful day, Wolfgang

If government truly cared about children there wouldn’t be scores of children missing from state care (Tusla) & many more subjected to sexual exploitation. There would be a ban on puberty blockers & child body mutilation. All scoliosis children would have received the needed treatment. Abortion numbers wouldn’t be skyrocketing. Children would not be indoctrinated in schools with trans ideology. Young girls would not have to share bathrooms with men. Adult fake asylum seekers would not be placed in facilities with children. IPAS centers would not be placed in the vicinity of schools. This has nothing to do with protecting children, its about protecting the governments monopoly on the production & distribution of information.

My first instinct was to support the UK’s social media ban for under 16s. Protecting children from grooming, exploitation and harmful content seems like common sense. But I’m seeing a lot of opposition to it, so I’m genuinely curious as to why? One thing making me second guess is that platforms like bluesky are exempt, while at the same time there’s a push to let 16 year olds vote. To me that looks less like child protection and more like controlling where young people get their information. Interested to hear other perspectives.

@DrMaxPowarr @GerryAdamsSF @GerryCarrollPBP @pb4p They turned Marxist is the early 70’s, now they view everything through the lens of oppressor vs oppressor.

I really struggle to understand these @GerryAdamsSF, @GerryCarrollPBP, @pb4p socialist types. The likes of Gerry Adams killed people because unionists took all the good jobs, all the social housing, etc., and they told us they were fighting a just war for our civil rights. Now these socialists invite the billions of surplus humans from around the world (@sinnfeinireland has said there should be no cap on immigration) to be in direct competition with us for jobs, for housing, for schools places, hospital and GP treatment, etc. which drives house prices and rents higher, wages lower, and our health into the gutter. They also cry about climate change and being 'Green' while simultaneously supporting the destruction of our environment and wildlife to build new houses, new sewage and water treatment plants, new power stations, new roads, etc., for the foreign hordes that land on our island each year. Each one that comes is coming for a low consumption society to a high consumption society, which increases our overall consumption of food, fertiliser, gas, electricity, petrol/diesel, causing inflation and more pollution. Our birth rates have been below replacement for 30 years, so these new houses that blight the landscape are not for us. Our birth rates have been below replacement which is where they wanted it with their support of abortions and telling us to have less kids to slow climate change. What is going on inside the heads of these socialists? Are they just regarded hypocrites, or is something more nefarious going on? Are they paid actors of the elites pretending to be socialists?