*Doc* Matimus Dorsal Grande

I changed my views on this yesterday. I'm against social control of wealth distribution. But there's a problem I can't solve. Consider the following points: ** Optimus (Tesla robot) is currently sporting 11 DoF (Degrees of Freedom) relative to hand mobility. This determines technical movement capability and range. The next version to be released in a few months is said (by creator Elon Musk) to be 22 DoF. For reference, a human being has 27 DoF. Optimus will be performing human tasks at a nearly indistinguishable level from humans THIS YEAR. ** Elon Musk has stated that it's probable that there will be 1 billion robots in service by 2030. ** Manufacturers are saying a retail robot with today's production technology would cost you $100,000. Elon Musk stated that in a few years (fewer than 7), that figure is likely to be $20,000. ** Optimus will go into mass production within 2024, according to Musk. It will be released for external purchase in 2025. The Model-T was introduced and went into mass production in 1908. ** In 1900, almost 0 people in the USA were driving cars. In 1913, over 80% of people drove cars owned by themselves or someone else. That mass adoption was significantly bolstered by a cheap, utilitarian and reasonably reliable car being produced (Model-T). ** Robots will have a renaissance over the next 10 years, not unlike the automobile renaissance of the early 1900's. ** Optimus is the Model-T of robots. ** Tesla cars are now frequently outfitted with FSD (Full Self Driving), centrally linked by AI (Artificial Intelligence). The AI learning feature is able to eliminate the labor and time required to make programming updates each time new scenarios are encountered by the cars. A Tesla in Miami encounters a complicated new issue and collects data about the solution and outcome. Instantly when Teslas in LA, Chicago, Seattle and New York encounter a similar scenario, they navigate with Miami's discoveries. Think: Skynet ** The above AI model is built into Optimus. ** Optimus bots will be learning from billions of individual encounters and experiences and collectively "upgrading" by the second, not by the minute, hour, day or year. Think: Skynet ** With the above considerations, Optimus will be doing surgery on human beings with fewer mistakes and blaringly obvious improvements in surgical outcomes over human beings within the decade. ** Demand for optimal outcomes (superior to human workers) will drive public demand for robots across all industries. Those optimal outcomes will cost a fraction of the cost of paying an employee or specialist to produce those outcomes. ** Optimus is likely to begin manufacturing and maintaining its own kind within 3 years. Availability will be quick and copious. ** Consider the careers listed at the following site: planitplus.net/JobProfiles?le……… ** Which of those careers could not be adequately filled by "Data" (name of the Android (robot) from the 1960's & 70's hit TV series, Star Trek)? This is where this is going. ** Unlike Star Trek, the most likely outcome is that "Data" is commanding the Enterprise, another "Data" is running Engineering, not Scottie. Another "Data" is sitting at Comms, not Lt Uhura. You get the point. ** Everyone can name that ONE career that a robot cannot replace. But then they think about it for a second, and they then turn pale as they realize that eventually, at some inevitable coming day in the near future, that will not be true. ** So, then what happens? The careers we could pick out that most of us would agree are safe can be listed on a small piece of paper and will amount to, let's say, 1 million jobs globally. Wait a minute! So 7 billion Earthlings will be wanting 1 million jobs? This is a serious coming problem. A serious problem indeed. My research over the decades has made me aware that there are Top Secret compartmentalized Special Access Projects operating in secret within the MIC (Military Industrial Complex) that have produced technology that the general population isn't even aware of to wit: (The following quotes are taken from various Ben Rich speeches and writings) [Ben Rich was the second Director of Lockheed’s Skunk Works from 1975 to 1991, succeeding its founder, Kelly Johnson. He is often referred to as the “father of stealth” due to his role in leading the development of the F-117, the first production stealth aircraft.] Imagine what this guy has seen, then consider the following things he said: Ben Rich: “We now have the technology to take ET back home” (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “We did the F-104, C-130, U2, SR-71, F-117 and many other programs that I can’t talk about. We are still working very hard, I just can’t tell you what we are doing." (source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation) “The Air Force has just given us a contract to take ET back home” (source: 1993 WPAFB slide presentation) “We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of GOD to ever get them out to benefit humanity” (source: statement made after UCLA presentation to three Disclosure Project witnesses) “We now know how to travel to the stars” (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “It is time to end all secrecy on this, as it no longer poses a national security threat, and make the technology available for use in the private sector”. (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “There are many in the intelligence community who would like to see this stay in the black, and not see the light of day” (source: UCLA School of Engineering Alumni speech 3/23/93) “Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty (50) years beyond what you could possibly comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we’ve been there done that, or decided it was not worth the effort” (Source: direct comments by Ben Rich to Jim Goodall via recorded telephone call at the USC medical center approximately one week before Ben passed away on January 5th 1995) “Dear John, Yes, I’m a believer in both categories. Feel anything is possible. Many of our man-made UFO’s were Un Funded Opportunities. In both categories, there are a-lot of books and charlatans, be careful. Best regards, Ben Rich”. (source: 7/21/86 letter to John Andrews (Testors model Corporation) from Ben Rich who asked Ben if he was a believer in A) man made UFO’S, and B) extra-terrestrial UFO’s) “I wish I could tell you about the projects we are currently working on. They are both fascinating and fantastic. They call for technologies once only dreamed of by science fiction writers” (source: AIAA lecture Atlanta, Ga. September 7-9 1988) All of the above is listed to bolster my assertion that humanity very likely ALREADY has "Data"-like robots in service within ultra-Top Secret military facilities and on domestic and (according to Rich in 1993 ffs) interstellar machinery. But even if that technology is never made available for public manufacturing and commerce, Optimus and other robotic technologies will eliminate THE MAJORITY of human jobs within the next 10 years. And then, Voila! Billions of people with no income. We. Are. Not. Decades. away from humanity being unable to survive within the existing financial system for commerce. The model of work > earn > spend WILL NOT work in the future. So what is the answer? Communal responsibilities performed for "shares"? Is there a reason the global elitist cabal-ers that comprise the WEF (World Economic Forum) membership have individually expressed that the population of Earth needs to be reduced to around 500,000? Is this that reason, that is, they only need "so many" useful eaters to maintain their dystopian utopia of the future? So what's the answer? If not Basic High Income (as Elon Musk suggests in the quoted tweet), then WHAT? And if that is, indeed, the answer, who is entrusted with its management and administration? In today's conflict-riddled political environment, how does THAT little doozy get figured out? Imagine the Fraud, Waste & Abuse of that behemoth. Don't be idealistic, dogmatic or "God will provide" on this. Seriously - what? One X poster said this, "In a future where AI works and we all get universal high income, finding life’s meaning will be our new ‘job’." Well that's a nice thought. But what about, "Idle hands make the devil's work"? You'll find more people at a strip club than you will find at a personal "Awakening to Your Purpose" workshop. Our current batch of humans is not ready for this. By a MILE. -end-

@C_3C_3 So the vilified John Birch Society was right all along...

Sitting down… 1970: 8 welfare programs 2026: 80+ welfare programs 1970: 1 million illegals 2026: 18 million illegals (3-4 x this) 1970: 88% white population 2026: 56% white population 1970: $371 billion deficit 2026: $38 trillion deficit Planned demolition of America. Sick

@TimRunsHisMouth Let's be fair and honest. This is not what you get merely when you have Democrats in charge. This is what you get when you have white liberal female Democrats in charge

In Maryland, they’re now debating what size tampons need to be in men’s bathrooms at their football and baseball stadiums. This is what you get when you have Democrats in charge.

@PennyCrayon5 @StefanMolyneux @grok given the sheer volume of information available on the surface of Earth, & upward within 400 miles of the surface, who is likely to have immediate access to a larger volume of war data, you or @PennyCrayon5? Which one of you is less likely to respond with emotion & bias?

@DocKilnit @StefanMolyneux Yes they are, they're forcing their hand using the worlds economy Grok doesn't have a clue how many missiles have landed or have been intercepted Have you noticed how many contradictions trump has made? It's not 5D chess, it's panic stations Grok does not know, stop asking it

IQ is the key to war. Compare Iraq vs Iran. Iran has 4–5 million high IQ people vs. only ~300,000 in Iraq. At IQ 160+ - where wars are won - Iran has 10,000-15,000 vs. just a few hundred in Iraq. Since Iran is a dictatorship, it can force geniuses into the military. You're at war with super-villains.

@AlBuffalo2nite How about we just do the part in the box? That way Congress doesn't have to pass more useless bills in order to pretend that they're working.

🚨 BREAKING: The House just passed a bill mandating automatic deportation for illegal immigrants convicted of welfare fraud… 231–186. Let that sink in. Crimes covered include Social Security fraud… SNAP fraud… mail fraud… conspiracy to defraud the United States… bribery or theft involving federal funds… ID fraud… and other schemes targeting taxpayer resources. This is baseline accountability. Yet 186 Democrats voted against it. Why? WHY? Not a gray area… not complicated… If someone enters the country illegally and then defrauds public systems funded by American workers… removal is the logical consequence. Anything less invites more abuse. #SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove

@TyBealPhD "skimmed milk" muted

🔥 It's out! We rated 289 foods by nutritional value—here's what we found 👇 Nutrient-dense foods like fish, meat, and non-starchy vegetables top the list.

The lack of self-awareness here is really is awe-inspiring. Boomers entered the workforce when corporations actually distributed profits to workers: wages rose in lockstep with productivity, pensions were standard, and loyalty was rewarded with 15-30+ year tenures at the same company. A single modest salary bought a house and raised kids. Then, during Boomer's prime working years the rules changed. From the late 1970s/80s onward corporate America flipped to hoarding those profits for shareholders and executives (Jack Welch “rank-and-yank” model). Productivity kept soaring while typical worker pay flatlined. Labor’s share of income collapsed & corporate profits share of the economy exploded. CEO-to-worker pay went from 20:1 to 300:1. Part of that “efficiency” was deliberately replacing higher paid, experienced, tenured employees with younger, cheaper labor, contractors, or offshoring the jobs entirely. Loyalty became a sucker’s bet. That’s why median job tenure today is only 3.9 years, and even lower for people under 35, not because Millennials and Gen Z are entitled grass-is-greener hoppers, but because companies stopped offering the stability and raises that made long tenures possible in Boomer's era. Boomers didn’t have it “easy” in raw effort. They had it easy because the system was still rigged in workers’ favor when Boomers needed it most, then the people running those corporations (many of them Boomers) rewrote the rules for maximum profit extraction. Younger generations are just living with the consequences of the greed shift Boomers watched happen in real time. That’s not hatred. That’s pattern recognition. Many of my Boomer clients wholeheartedly agree. Why? Because individually they're not the selfish, toxic, "me, me, me" pricks that the Boomer generation as a whole tends to be, both male and female.

@DocKilnit @ItIsHoeMath @ChrisMartin1961 Because young folls today aren't satisfied with how their life is going so they go from one job to the next?

I’m seeing, yet again, this surge of hatred for the Boomer generation. I’m a late season Boomer, born in 1961; I’ve worked for nearly 50 years, have been in the same profession for 37 years, I’ve routinely worked 45-60 hours a week. I don’t get why we are so vilified.

@HipposinTutus @ItIsHoeMath @ChrisMartin1961 Nope. When Boomers took over corporate leadership, they began dealing the excess back into their own pockets & retaining, vs distributing, corporate profits. See: data Corporations created the job turnover environment, not workers, by converting tenure loyalty into hostility.

@DocKilnit @ItIsHoeMath @ChrisMartin1961 And who's fault is that? That they either can't keep or move from job to job casing greener grass on in that time? Are people laid off? Sure but that's also not what I'm seeing.

@Fini143 @ItIsHoeMath @ChrisMartin1961 If you are a Boomer, you fit perfectly into the "lack of self-awareness" box. Nicely done. If you're not a Boomer, congratulations. You lack spatial awareness. I have thousands of retired Boomer clients. They're the last generation to have 15+ year jobs and only 1-2 careers.

@DocKilnit @ItIsHoeMath @ChrisMartin1961 Were I your client, I would sever the relationship stat due to your lack of respect and self-awareness. Thoughtful people of any age today, especially Boomers, are aware that lifetime employment has always been a myth. Econ 101

@Kittenwaffin TF is "native"? Mexican? Because that blue line is statistically the Mexican line. Nice gaslight. "Native". smh Just like somehow in the past 15 years someone made all people from the top of Canada to the bottom of South America, WHITE. Proof? Go look at arrest records.

They try to convince you that White men are the problem. Meanwhile:

@ItIsHoeMath @ChrisMartin1961 The lack of self-awareness of the Boomer generation in general is awe-inspiring. Credentials: I work exclusively with Boomer clientele for the past 15 years. "I worked at the same job for a thousand years" [has no idea the average job tenure for young folks today is 3.9yrs]

@ChrisMartin1961 This is a really great example of why everyone hates you

@ItIsHoeMath @ailanyus How much does it pay?

@ailanyus Why do they need a squad? One guy could do it

IDAHO HAS AUTHORIZED THE DEATH PENALTY BY FIRING SQUAD FOR PEDOPHILES DO YOU SUPPORT THIS MOVE?

@gotzlore @CaryKelly11 @grok That's your response after someone takes the time to provide you with data? Nothing says manly like emotional defense & crying "gish gallop" when evidence offers a possible level-up in thinking & subject matter clarity. Feminine defends all victims equally, criminal & saint.

@DocKilnit @CaryKelly11 @grok You could have just said "my bad". It's unmanly to gish gallop.

A 2022 study found that 1062 adults in their 60s, taking nattokinase, daily for a year, showed amazing improvement in lipid markers, including plaque reduction. Plaque -36.0% LDL -18.1% HDL +15.8% Trigs -15.7% Nattokinase is an enzyme extracted from natto, a traditional Japanese food made by fermenting boiled soybeans with bacterium. Lots of things to consider here: Japan ranks #1 for age-standardized cardiovascular disease mortality among G20+ countries. Big Pharma must hate this study because it makes Statins look like Tic Tacs. Fermented foods truly are superfoods. Soybeans suck but at least it's real food. There was no placebo group which some made a big deal out of because people can totally subliminally control specific lipid values. 😂 x.com/realPatrickJr/…

@grok relative to the most recent IIT scores... **confirm that they suffer from extreme self-selection bias. **Confirm that they draw from a non-representative sample. **Confirm digital divide exclusionary bias. **Confirm that the IIT deployed in uncontrolled testing conditions (unsupervised format allows cheating, distractions, multiple attempts, inconsistent effort, and external assistance, unlike standardized proctored assessments). **Confirm questionable test validity and norms **Confirm demographic skew

@DocKilnit @StefanMolyneux @grok Lynn Becker is wrong though @grok use the most recent IIT scores and calculate again

@PennyCrayon5 @StefanMolyneux @grok is Iran currently running rings around Israel and the USA in the current conflict?

@DocKilnit @StefanMolyneux So a bunch of 84 IQ people are running rings around Israel and the USA? I'm not sure that was a wise ask of grok, it's humiliating

Self-awareness, my friend. There are classes/workshops to help in this regard if you're motivated. Using Grok to verify claims isn't "arguing". It's exactly the evidence-seeking habit you're advocating. ******It's 1995, you're in 11th grade****** You: "Why did I get an "F" on this research paper?" Teacher: "Because you strung a bunch of words and opinions together without citing a single point of data or source". You: "But I don't believe in going to the library (Grok) to research, source data or gather supportive information ." Teacher: "Exactly. Glance down and see the resulting 'F' on your research project." Now, debunking your PVD drivel: No, that's not what the study shows, and there's still zero evidence linking oral nattokinase supplements to posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) as a side effect in humans. The phrase "Posterior Vitreous Detachment Induced by Nattokinase" comes from a single 2006 animal study (Takano et al., published in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science). In it, researchers injected purified nattokinase (subtilisin NAT) directly into the vitreous cavity of rabbit eyes (intravitreal injection at doses like 0.1–1 FU). The goal? To intentionally induce PVD as a potential new tool for "pharmacologic vitreolysis", a non-surgical way to separate the vitreous gel from the retina for treating vitreoretinal conditions (like certain diabetic retinopathy cases or traction issues). Low doses successfully created clean PVD with no major toxicity; higher doses caused some preretinal hemorrhage and temporary ERG changes. This is not a human study. This is not about swallowing nattokinase pills, natto, or supplements. This is not reporting PVD as an adverse event from oral use. Fast-forward: Extensive searches of PubMed, safety reviews, clinical trials (including the 1-year human study you originally posted and longer-term data up to 3 years), and adverse-event databases turn up zero case reports, zero signals, and zero mentions of oral nattokinase causing PVD, increased floaters, retinal issues, or any ocular detachment in people. The only consistent risk noted across reviews (WebMD, RxList, etc.) is increased bleeding potential when combined with blood thinners, not eyes. On "understudied"? Yes, the specific effects of oral nattokinase on the vitreous humor or PVD risk are understudied, mainly because there's no plausible mechanism (it's a protein enzyme mostly broken down in the gut; systemic levels don't reach the eye in concentrations anywhere near the direct-injection experiments). Japanese natto consumption for centuries and modern supplement trials haven't flagged eye problems. PVD itself is extremely common with normal aging (especially in your 60s+), so any coincidence would need actual data to blame supplements. This fits the same pattern as the joint-degradation claim: a title cherry-picked without context, repeated until it feels true (classic illusory truth effect). The actual paper positions nattokinase positively as a potential eye-treatment enzyme when used precisely by doctors, not a danger from daily oral use.

@DocKilnit @CaryKelly11 @grok Grok, tell this dirty pleb about "Posterior Vitreous Detachment Induced by Nattokinase", couple it with how understudied Natto's effects in this are, and finally give them life coaching on seeking their own answers versus using grok to argue.

@Landscapecture "Greenhouse" Made me look and... yup, Africa account. Muted. Stop posting AI regurgitations that you can't even translate.

I Built a Greenhouse Using an Old Barrel (AI)

@gotzlore @CaryKelly11 @grok confirm there's no evidence from clinical studies, reviews, or research linking nattokinase to joint degradation, cartilage damage, arthritis, or related issues. Confirm that this natto-joints thing is a typical Illusory Truth Effect.

@CaryKelly11 Plain ole flushing niacin will burn the plaques out. I'm a fan of nattokinase for brief use cases but long term daily usage could degrade joints.

Well, here's the rest of the study story: The reported improvements (in the 10,800 FU group) included: Carotid plaque area reduction: ~36.0% (with ~66.5% of participants showing improvement). LDL cholesterol: ~18.1% reduction. HDL cholesterol: ~15.8% increase. Triglycerides: ~15.7% reduction. Overall lipid profile improvements in 84–95% of participants depending on the marker.

@kasmha5150 You're right. Context matters. High HDL is good. LDL can vary greatly in healthy. It's just fun to play the numbers game as dictated by the medical establishment and seeing real food still win over drugs.

@kena_ewuru Straight women maybe, but if the feminists got their wish for all men to die or be subjugated into low-T toys for women, butch lesbians would take over the man stuff, and butch lesbians can get shit done.

“De@th to all men” A sneak peek of what a world without men would actually look like

@Emilio2763 Yeah but what's going on with this eye?

“When they’re White it is Right”…