๊ณ ์ ๋ ํธ์
๐๐๐๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
52.8K posts
๐๐๐๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
@DutchHumanist
Humanist | Atheist | Science
Nederland ๊ฐ์
์ผ Mayฤฑs 2015
361 ํ๋ก์678 ํ๋ก์
@CathLouisa1976 @raziel1110101 Dat komt omdat je knetterdom bent, Cath.
Nederlands
@raziel1110101 Mijn hoofd kan daar niet bij
Sorry
Zolang iets om de eigen as draait en zelf om iets anders heen draait kan die geen helft verborgen houden
Nederlands
Durf te vragen. Ook โdommeโ vragen: Kan iemand mij uitleggen hoe je de achterkant van de maan nooit kunt zien als de maan zelf om de eigen as draait en om de aarde draait? Dan is er toch altijd een moment dat de โachterkantโ richting aarde staat?
NOS Mirror@NOSmirror
Wat het zien van de mysterieuze achterkant van de maan ons moet leren nos.nl/l/2609304?utm_โฆ
Nederlands
@CathLouisa1976 @wesleychadli Als het antwoord je niet bevalt, waarom stel je dan รผberhaupt de vraag, gestoorde wap?
Nederlands
@wesleychadli Pak eens een appel en laat die rond zijn eigen as draaien terwijl die om een voetbal draaitโฆ.. dan is er altijd een moment dat de achterkant richting aarde staat
Nederlands
i wanna know what internet provider theyโre using up there
FearBuck@FearedBuck
Netflix will livestream NASAโs Artemis II crew flying by the Moon starting at 1 PM ET tomorrow.
English
How big is the nothingness out there?
NASA@NASA
One last look at Earth before we reach the Moon. This view of the Earth was captured on April 5, the fourth day of the Artemis II mission, from inside the Orion spacecraft. The four astronauts will reach their closest approach of the Moon tomorrow, April 6.
English
๐๐๐๐ท๐๐๐๐๐๐๐@DutchHumanist
@FibonaciDude @mark_petereit I would just give it up, moron. We already get it: no matter what mountains of evidence we fling at you, you will never believe it. Because you're an uneducated moron with zero understanding in physics, who will just dig down into his own warped reality.
QME
@DutchHumanist @mark_petereit So how did WTC7 collapse into its own footprint on 9/11
Because it defies all laws of physics
GIF
English
Itโs hilarious that the people claiming the moon landings never happened are all typing their comments into devices that wouldnโt even exist except for the technology pioneered for the moon missions.
English
@Ishaq66939slrk @NASA I would now just crawl back into your trailer, your moron.
You're embarassing yourself by making batshit stupid statements like this.
English
@Ishaq66939slrk @NASA It's called the Sun.
English
@Jeffmaehr @NASA That's because you're a moron.
English
@NASA So, how can this "moon" be such a small little thing with Artemis being so much closer, and yet "my" moon outside my door is this?
English
@EspressoJose @Pinboard If you don't understand the limits of basic photography, I would shut up if I were you.
English
@Pinboard They have long lenses. I would expect a similar photo.
English
@FibonaciDude @mark_petereit I would just give it up, moron. We already get it: no matter what mountains of evidence we fling at you, you will never believe it.
Because you're an uneducated moron with zero understanding in physics, who will just dig down into his own warped reality.
English
@mark_petereit And how many times has that happened at any other similarly designed building anywhere else in the world EVER?
The correct answer is ZERO!!!
If you donโt possess the ability to ask questions and use logic, reason and common sense you arenโt a scientist
You are a gullible clown
English
Waneer is er een script voor een film over de spectaculaire reddingsactie in #Iran, en waarom is #MattDamon nog niet gecast
Nederlands
@RjNol This is a fake video made by a well known conspiracy nutjob. It's not from NASA.
Which immediately proves that MLD's don't really believe what they're saying. They even resort to creating fake videos to hold up their world view.
English
If there were 4 astronauts on the Artemis II mission, who was filming?
Did the camera make that movement, ending in a close-up on Earth, because of zero gravity?๐ค
English
@dominion_xy @alexboge More AI slop.
Nederlands
Here we have one of the flat Earth / moon landing denial grifters trying to keep his little revenue stream alive by feeding his audience another round of recycled fakery.
I wonโt link it. It doesnโt deserve the traffic.
What heโs pushing is a laughably bad โgreen screenโ claim built off a real Artemis II image. Not clever. Not subtle. Just sloppy.
And the best part is the replies.
Comment after comment tearing it apart, pointing out the obvious errors, the broken lighting, the inconsistencies. Itโs so poorly done it would be funny if it werenโt so predictable.
But it still works on his audience.
The likes, the shares, the engagement. Whether organic or padded like his follower count, it doesnโt matter. There is a market for this.
Because there are still people who will reject real, verifiable imagery captured by actual astronauts, yet eagerly accept the most amateur, low-effort fakes if it tells them what they already want to hear.
And as long as thereโs an audience willing to reward garbage like this, there will always be someone ready to manufacture it.
English
@RKTScienceGuy @TheDilemmaLama @pureMetatron It doesn't matter how much facts you throw at these conspiracy nutters. They'll all discard it.
English
@TheDilemmaLama @pureMetatron The Japanese Navy met the US Navy at midway. How did each get there?
Is every pilot who claims to have flown across the Pacific from the US to Asia part of a giant conspiracy?
English
@TheDilemmaLama @pureMetatron People have been succesfully circumnavigating the world since the 1500's, you absolute moron.
English
@pureMetatron Have you ever personally circumnavigated the world? No didn't think so.
The Japanese sailed East. The ocean waves became so big they never got past them.
The US sailed West. The waves became so big they never got past them.
Both myths together gave us the "PAciFic OceAn". ๐คก
English
Have pity with this poor gullible soul:
Ancient Paths@AncientPathsYT
All flat earthers started out as globe earthers. We didn't just wake up one morning and decide it would be fun to be ridiculed. We had the intellectual honesty to look into why so many other people were reaching this conclusion, and yes there are millions of us now. Just look in the comments of any Artemis post anywhere on the internet and you'll see us there. I grew up obsessed with Star Wars. I took astronomy classes in college as electives bc I genuinely loved the idea of infinite space. I didn't want the earth to be flat. It just objectively is flat, and I discovered that when I began honestly researching the subject. I looked into it at first just to better debunk it. What I found instead was a wealth of proofs that would take days to list in one post. If anyone reading this is an actual critical thinker, and secure enough to look into it to understand why so many people believe in it, here are some good starting resources. Testingtheglobe.com youtu.be/tD5g7h_-Sfw?siโฆ a.co/d/04XTvZPa
English
@Joseph_Starl1nk @ManaByte Even if everything was live streamed in 4K, and part of the mission actually is, you still wouldn't believe it.
English
Denying the six Apollo landings isnโt โskepticism.โ Itโs erasing the work of over 400,000 engineers, technicians, mathematicians, welders, programmers, and astronauts who built the most complex machines in human history. It ignores the factories, the tracking stations, the telemetry, the photographs, the samples, the independent observers, and the entire technological revolution that came out of the program.
Pretending all of that never happened doesnโt expose NASA. It exposes how little respect you have for the people who actually built the future.
And, in my opinion, doing so should be considered treason.
English
@KeeveStallings @ManaByte You're a gullable idiot.
English
@ArtVaderOne @ManaByte Your logic makes no sense, and NASA didn't "lose" the technology, as argumented a million times already. All designs still exist. It's just that there are no factories producing the physical artifacts anymore, and restarting those would be more costly.
English
