@CobDetlef@_MDV_ Meest gestelde domme vragen tot nu toe:
"Dat lunar ding is van aluminiumfolie"
"Waarom lijkt de maan zo klein"
"Waarom hadden ze een go cart"
"Vlag wappert"
"Raket in vacuum kannie"
"Meh Van Allen Belt, kannie"
Wat. Een. Lutsers.
@DutchHumanist@_MDV_ Inderdaad, nul komma nul kennis fysica. Die mensen gaan ook niet stoppen tot ze er echt zelf staan. En dan nog zullen ze een theorie klaarhebben waarbij ze niet zeker waren of iemand hen toevallig niet had ontvoerd naar een donkere kamer om hen er een hologram te tonen.
Deze foto, van de opkomende Aarde gezien vanaf de Maan, is gewoon genomen op een 7 cm breed fotorolletje in 1969. Afstand rond de 390.000 km. Er zijn waarschijnlijk weer mensen zijn die dit een AI foto vinden.
@awscloudconcept@LeftwaffenWatch Do you know something that James Van Allen himself doesnโt?
Cos not even he said the belts are problematic to go through.
I keep seeing the same absolutely retarded moon landing denier arguments
โwHeRe aRe tHe stArsโ?
โhOw diD thEY gET tHE cAR up thereโ?
โlANdLInE cALl fRoM tHe mOOnโ?
โItโS mADE oF tInFOiLโ
All that nonsense can be debunked with five minutes of research, and I donโt mean TikTok videos
How did people get so moronic?
The U.S. is trying to bomb and kill the surviving pilot in Iran.
American jets have begun dropping massive payloads on the Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-Ahmad Province (largely uninhabited).
Theyโve withdrawn all helicopters and recon planes. They are not trying to rescue him.
Flat earthers canโt understand the simplest concepts. The moon is a different size in these photos because the cameras have a different focal length. 15mm (full frame equivalent) on the Orion GoPro, versus Iโm guessing 1200-1600mm on the image on the right. 1/2
It's actually a good thing we went to the Moon so long ago.
Before CGI existed.
Before AI existed.
Impossible footage to fake given 1960's technology.
Watching this blows my mind every time ๐
The camera that took this picture, a Hasselblad, was not protected in any way from solar radiation.
The moon unlike Earth is in direct intense sunlight as it has no atmosphere or magnetosphere.
The Kodak film would have been destroyedโฆ this picture could not have been taken on the moon.
@coffeebreaks900@AbyssHeritier@BitcoinIsaiah@grok@KeeveStallings This is the lunar module which disengaged from the command module. It only needed to land on the moon and re-attach back to the command module. All while operating in a vacuum.
Ergo: don't vent your opinion on things you know nothing about.
@HighImpactFlix@excid2@ZadeSmith4 No, you moron, they can't. Artemis needs to be lauched at exactly the right time to align correctly for the flight path to the moon, and you can't just accelerate or hit the breaks on the ISS to "meet" them.
Now go away.
@excid2@ZadeSmith4 We can time the arrival of asteroids into our solar system, but we can't coordinate the passing of the ISS with the lift off of Artemis? They couldn't line that up?
The ISS circles the earth once every 90 minutes. Of the seven crew members aboard the ISS, no one thought it would be a good idea to film Artemis 2 lifting off and punching through the atmosphere from the perspective of space? It could have been one of the most historic sites ever filmed.
@DarthLordFelix@ManaByte I mean, Indiaโs satellites took images of the moon recently that show our equipment at the landing sites. Why would they fabricate?
The generation that lived during Apollo watched the landings on TV.
The generation thatโs living during Artemis think that Apollo never happened and arenโt paying attention because they watched a few idiots on YouTube or TikTok.