고정된 트윗
Emmanuel Shroud
19.3K posts
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 Ok. One guy who had a brief stint at Everton then played in MLS. One guy who was decent at Fullahm and a GK. Who else was on the team?
English
@EmmanuelShroud @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 I didn't know that Landon Donovan, Clint Dempsey, Tim Howard were irrelevant.
Ah yes European coach, lost all friendlies against European teams. Got scored on 11 times in 4 games.
English
.@DaxMcCarty11 says Friday’s win changed his expectation for USMNT:
“I thought Quarterfinal run, now I’m thinking Semi-Final run and anything could happen beyond that. This was, in the first half, the 2nd-best half the USMNT has ever played in a World Cup.”
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 In other words, History tells you what happened. Roster tells you what is possible.
English
@EmmanuelShroud @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 If you still don't understand, I'll even make it. It's easier for you
2022 round of 16
2018 did not qualify
2014 round of 16
2010 round of 16
2006 group stages
2002 quarterfinals
And you are wishing for the semi-final, FROM ONE GAME
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 This current roster has significantly more players starting in top European leagues and a different manager, so it has to be evaluated on its own terms, not as a continuation of 2006–2018 teams. And you can evaluate that POTENTIAL without results. The players and manager matter.
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 Those results were produced by different US squads in different cycles with very different roster composition and coaching setups. Treating them as a fixed ceiling for the current team doesn’t follow logically.
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 You don’t have to glaze. You have to acknowledge the talent level and then asses their ceiling. That’s the issue you’re running into. You’re totally ignoring the talent while placing an extreme reliance on past results. It’s not crazy to say the US has enough talent to make it
English
@EmmanuelShroud @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 I'm not going to blindly praise a team in the biggest tournament on the planet... Because they won one game. I'll glaze them like everyone else is once I see it consistent results. That's the point. Every World Cup, this happens. Glaze, glaze, glaze.. disappointment
English
@TunawithaCh @rizza_X0 “My feelings are correct, not data”
English
The only parents complaining about this social media ban are the ones letting the ipad do the parenting. All children need to learn to be social properly. Having mates online is not a social life, social media is the leading cause of social anxiety i guarantee it.
English
@LeahRay44 Did you just dox yourself? Might want to take this down Leah
English
@WCInvesting @antibearthesis Yes they’ll give up something they never wanted. Brilliant
English
@antibearthesis Gulf states will be paying if Iran gives up alot of things such as Nuclear weapon hopes and uranium enrichment.
US won't be paying much I'd imagine
English
$100B to bomb it
$300B to fix it
Taxpayers right now:
Kalshi Finance@Kalshi_Finance
JUST IN: U.S.-Iran deal could reportedly include a $300,000,000,000.00 reconstruction fund for Iran
English
English
@DrVonSteiner @WasAcop Until the local cellular infrastructructure is programed to query all connected devices for the same age check verification. Which adds a login, userid and backhauled OOB query to a central server infrastructure processing and capturing ALL of this data.
Your phone is a leash
English
🚨Labour confirms ID requirement at device level - VPNs useless.🚨
By forcing Apple and Google to verify age at the device level during phone setup…
Keir Starmer’s government isn’t protecting kids — it’s building a surveillance infrastructure.
The OS itself will restrict platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X, making VPNs largely useless because the block happens before any traffic leaves your phone.
🚨Once every device carries a verified age profile, authorities gain an easy route to identify users through legal requests to tech firms.
This is digital ID by the back door, sold as child safety.
Classic Labour: expand state control first, ask questions later.
thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
English
@Stefan_01010011 @blixberrie The point is knowing who posts what. Everything you do will be tied to your information. No anonymity in the country that is jailing people for more posts than China. Literally.
English
@blixberrie Cough… Credit Cards and existing ID’s can and will be able to be used… Cough..
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK
🚨 SUMMARY: The UK's social media ban for children from early 2027: - "User-to-user" apps where people create, share and interact with content (e.g. TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, X, Facebook) will be banned for under-16s - WhatsApp, Signal and YouTube Kids will be exempt - Under-16s will also be banned from livestreaming, messaging strangers on gaming apps like Discord and using disappearing messages - 16 and 17 year olds will face nightly social media curfews and limits on infinite scrolling with more details next month - AI "romantic companion" chatbots will be banned for under-18s - Adults can still access social media through age checks like facial recognition, digital IDs, passports and credit cards
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 Your argument collapses into a circular rule
“They can only be considered capable of X once they’ve already done X.” That’s not how sports work. The roster matters.
English
@EmmanuelShroud @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 Spain has a team of stars. Brazil has a team. France has a team of stars. The difference is they can actually say we are feared. Why? They've done it. They got history. They got results.
You have a good team. ZERO RESULTS.
One good game. Lost gold cup. That's all you got.
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 If the US roster now has multiple top-5 league starters, Champions League-level players, and a top coach, then their ceiling must be evaluated based on that, not on a completely different generation that had MLS-heavy squads. You can be skeptical while acknowledging potential.
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 At a certain point, past results are irrelevant to the present. It’s all about who’s on your team NOW.
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 Correct but that irrelevant to the discussion. Your logic doesn’t hold. Again if I put all the best players on one team do you need proof or history to believe that they had the talent to go far in the tournament?
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 It’s an extreme example, but it gets at the flaw in your reasoning
English
@EmmanuelShroud @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 Morocco is an excellent example. A team, no one ever predicted could go so far, And they finished 4th. They proved, PROVED, their worth. They proved they were underdogs and did it.
The United States hasn't PROVED anything.
English
@Gordo_C24 @FTFonFS1 @DaxMcCarty11 When the US dream team in basketball out all the stars on their team in the 90s, I didn’t need for them to prove they would be good and CAPABLE of winning the Olympics.
English