@NarniaJGC Not to mention rage cheese that the majority of the cast had.
English
Firewater
20.5K posts
Firewater
@FirewaterDM
Debate Coach I use twitter to talk about my hobbies, and things that interest me. All words here are mine.
가입일 Eylül 2012
645 팔로잉483 팔로워
Everyone defending Smash 4 played a broken ass top tier. Literally anyone below Villager on the tier list was miserable in 90% of mus.
Fox is cool, Marth was cool, sheik can be cool.
Unfortunately 90% of mus were broken top tiers winning the game before the match started
English
damn for once one of these things hate March people.
Pokemonshell@Pokemonshell
What's your Pokemon?😍👇
English
@RealRetroNC Casually? who tf actually searched for Milotic if they didn't get lucky on the 6 tiles it was fishable from AND the pokeblocks needed.
Besides that and Metagross (can't obtain until beating the Elite 4) I think these are semi-feasible teams
English
has anyone ever had a team like this or is the slop acc doing performative playthru comps again
Pokémon Daily Post💫@PokeDailyPost
English
Team 3
team 1 has 2 of my all time favorites but i refuse to pick the fire chicken lol
Pokémon Daily Post💫@PokeDailyPost
English
Besides Dead by Deadlight it is the complete opposite in every game at the moment. Maybe I should expand my own game library but I genuinely cannot think of another game that has this problem most competitive players want more people to play the game
shipz 𖤐@heyshipz
What game is this?🚀
English
I might just be the casual hater but this lowkey looks annoying as hell even on a we are purely playing for fun FFA type of deal.
I respect the hell out of the free projectile Wall Runners off parry though that part is actually cool
Rivals of Aether II@RivalsOfAether
We're adding 10 new Casual Stages to Rivals of Aether II on April 7th. This is WALL RUN🪨 No platforms. All chaos. Stand on the ledges on either side of the stage if you want to avoid the Wall Runners that are constantly barreling toward you!
English
might be biased but it has to be the NFC East because outside of particular rivalries I've never seen so many people wanting everyone to lose no matter their personal team
I think the ONLY thing that forces cooperation is needing one of the others to win to clinch a playoff spot
Call me Trey 🥷🏾@Saints504_
What's the most toxic division in the NFL?
English
@MizukiAlola Excellent ragebait, genuinely something that causes intense anger if you don't read LMAO
English
@SkaVorah @Cellowphane Games don't do this. In fact more games actually do the complete opposite, to the detriment of their games lol.
Games shouldn't cater to one side, but catering to casuals makes games worse than pros/high rank because the high ranks play the game more and understand it better
English
Told y’all this is going to be the season where rivals loses its causal players/everyone will go to QM and ruin that because they will treat it like comp.
Bready@bready_ow
First game of ranked in the new season and 5 supports are banned 💀 wtf
English
Unfortunately there are far too many of these people out there, they've destroyed a TON of games in the process in multiple genres as well.
Lorelei@Normalssbbbx
There’s a very weird subset of people (casual players that don’t want to improve but also can’t handle losing) who wish that all competitive games were just rock paper scissors.
English
I know this is AI ragebait but the amount of absurdity and lack of friendship here pisses me off LMAO.
You can't be ok enough to drop 100 on a March Madness pool, but broke enough to snitch on your friends for your money back 😂
Chase Passive Income@chasedownleads
Told my friend to organize March Madness pool with everyone we know $100 buy-in, 200 participants If I win, I get $20,000 If I lose, I report my friend for running an illegal gambling ring and collect a $50k whistleblower reward The ultimate win/win scenario
English
Firewater 리트윗함
“Toxic casuals” in the gaming community who not only reject, but advocate for the removal of skill gaps in games have done more damage to gaming than any “try hard” ever has.
Gaming casually is perfectly fine, but losing to those who take the time to learn, embrace, and master the mechanics of a game should be expected and accepted if you do play more casually.
Rino🚀@RinoTheBouncer
What gaming opinion will you defend like this?🚀
English
Also (ran out of characters). Being a sweat isn't a bad thing, and using that term as an insult just signals how dogshit of a player and person you are.
The only bad "sweats" are ones who make playing games with their friends unfun OR ones who cheat to ensure they never lose.
English
Catering to new, casual and bad players instead of the most loyal, invested and talented playerbase is always incorrect.
There are exceptions, but like 95% of balance decisions should only be done around the top players of any game because they're the most invested (top 10-15%)
Rino🚀@RinoTheBouncer
What gaming opinion will you defend like this?🚀
English
@1F41L I think you could even go as far as the top 10%.
But most recent games ruin themselves appealing to casuals vs the actual people investing time into their games. The person who plays a game 1-2 hrs a day, is more likely to spend money than the person playing once every 2-3 weeks
English
