Base 16
7.7K posts


@monkey41119 @Bratt_world @Libertymama888 @OwenShroyer1776 you mean Israel already invaded and occupied israel until hezbollah beat them out and now israel is invading again
English

@Foolsfork1 @Bratt_world @Libertymama888 @OwenShroyer1776 Lol.. israel had already won south Lebanon territory in the 1980s and gave it back in the 2000s..
Even before Hezbollah, Lebanon took part in wars against israel. They literally attacked israel when it was just created.
English

They went from media blackout to wanting the entire world to see.
Why is that?
Experience Humans@XperienceHumans
Tel Aviv after an Iranian missile strike.
English
Base 16 리트윗함


@iamphil123 There hasnt been a single pDAI minted since the ESM was triggered early 2025
English

Do we expect another pDai mint (~95% dip) sometime tomorrow or shortly after, once people start messing around with the new $pDai $PAI ILK and adding collateral?
Seems like a very easy way to gain control over even more $pDai
If that's what's needed to progress, we're going to see some very painful posts over the next little while.
English

@dimakat @NaiKaroYar @DavidM_Friedman Perhaps the 'Israelis' shouldn't have invaded and taken palestinian, Lebanese and Syrian land and occupied it ?
English

@NaiKaroYar @DavidM_Friedman Perhaps the "Palestinians" shouldn't have started a war
English

@CraigDMauger First I thought this was per litre (like the rest of the developed world ) then I remembered US still use imperial gallons 🤡
English

@DarkKimberXXX @brianstephens00 @disclosetv The land of Israel has been Jewish land for over thousands of years preexisting Islam and Christianity as promised land gifted to the patriarchs and the nation of Israel.
Your pov is irrelevant.
English

@Bobby1_x @disclosetv after Lebanon falls will they target syria or jordan next 🤔? probably syria since it's weakened from it's previous civil war.
English

@captain_ayub @glacierptrading @unusual_whales Like Vietnam , Iraq, Afghanistan etc all they have to do to win is survive
English

@glacierptrading @unusual_whales LMAO by what measure are they winning.
English

@files_dirty The regulators havent yet finished shooting themselves in the foot
English

@AltcoinDaily So the clarity of the clarity act is that crypto is not allowed to compete with banks
English

@hervecrypto @AltcoinDaily Cardano wont be a security, it is decentralized as far it can be.
English

@AltcoinDaily L2's will be considered commodities
L1s will be securities
Meme coins will most likely be Commodities
English

@TheGray369 It is sad to me that after having one RH coin to rule them all (HEX) , we were diluted and wrecked into eHEX, pHEX, PLS, PLSX and then even more wrecked and diluted by PRVX too
English

The sacrifice of $PRVX is interesting. Richard structured this sacrifice model of not taking his tokens, the result was tanking the cores to new ATLs and hitting the other alts on-chain really hard. Then you have the launch where all the LP was added with stables and $Eth. He also knows that this would push the price down on the cores again. Remember what Trump coin did.
So my question is: When creating new products, why is so much of the launch structure designed to suppress price and send your other tokens to new lows? Is it to speed up the sell pressure on-chain and make weak hands get less $ for more tokens? Is it to create one token that is pretty much not tied to his others?
I’m very interested to see how this plays out. I believe the 6-month price action of $PLS, $PRVX, $HEX, and $PLSX will answer these questions. Whatever the reason is, $pTGC and $UFO will win. No guessing just code, deflation, and APY for holding. Everything we need and more, with flawless operations and primed for a massive move. All indicators are giving buy signals.

English

@hexyafcajun Poo Poo PulseChain. The phrase that will ring for 10,000 years.
English

@monkey41119 @Bratt_world @Libertymama888 @OwenShroyer1776 Israel have been trying to steal Southern Lebanese territory since the 1970s. Hezbollah was founded to kick Israel out and keep them out
English

@Bratt_world @Libertymama888 @OwenShroyer1776 Wasn't it hazbullah which literally fired rockets at israel first? Which eyes did you open?
English

Mark Rutte just told the world that NATO is “coming together” to secure the Strait of Hormuz. He applauded Trump’s leadership. He beamed. He practically offered to carry the man’s golf bag.
There is one problem with this. Germany, the UK, Italy, Spain, and France have all stated, in plain language, that the conflict is not a NATO war.  France officially refused to participate. Trump responded by calling NATO a “paper tiger without the US,” and accused European allies of complaining about high oil prices while refusing to do anything about them. 
So Rutte is applauding the leadership of a man who is simultaneously publicly humiliating him. This is a level of masochism usually reserved for advanced yoga instructors.
Rutte has made a habit of irritating his European colleagues by crediting Trump personally for NATO’s defence spending increases, insisting that Spain, Italy, Belgium and Canada would never have moved without Trump’s pressure.  His audience, being Spanish, Italian, Belgian and Canadian, sat there and absorbed this. One imagines they were delighted.
El Pais has been particularly scathing, questioning the competence of the current NATO and EU leadership and concluding that European leadership has failed to provide coherent direction during the Iran crisis.  They named names: von der Leyen, Kallas, Rutte. The whole top table.
Rutte has also dismissed proposals from Manfred Weber and others for European-led security structures independent of Washington, insisting the transatlantic partnership remains “essential.”  The timing, given that Washington is currently calling NATO a paper tiger and questioning whether it would ever help America, is not ideal.
And here is the real engine of the absurdity: Rutte told Fox News the good news is that 22 countries are “joining forces to realize Trump’s vision.”  Trump’s vision. He said that out loud. On Fox News. To Trump’s primary audience.
Mark Rutte is not stupid. He is, in fact, quite clever. But there is a difference between diplomatic pragmatism and turning up to your own roast with extra tomatoes. Every European and Canadian leader watching him on television yesterday knows that Trump just used the Hormuz crisis to explicitly threaten to deprioritize NATO support for Ukraine. Rutte’s response was to applaud the leadership.
It is, as a communications strategy, the geopolitical equivalent of saying the food is delicious as the restaurant burns down around you.
Gandalv / @Microinteracti1
English

















