
BritannianSpirit
964 posts

BritannianSpirit
@GTXTrainPower
Writer, Roleplayer, Character Hoarder. https://t.co/zCWlNlZwho
Australia 가입일 Temmuz 2017
644 팔로잉21 팔로워

@idgafayf702 @kid_riles Taxes? Trump has spent billions in the war with Iran. You have the money to pay first time home owners. The tariff refund would have worked - but it would've went to businesses, not to the people who actually paid for it (consumers.)
English

@kid_riles Well, genius. Explain how a president can just grant people money? I know Trump mentioned a tariff refund….
That was absurd. He can’t just give money away.
So, go ahead and explain how she would have granted anyone $25k.
I love to learn.
English

@HoggerLang @4res44444444 If you watch someone die by letting a very stoppable object drop on them (Let's say, a large rock). You become an accomplice to murder. Your scenarios take power out of your hands - the scenario places you directly in power over life and death. So yes, guilty by omission.
English

@4res44444444 If I’m asleep in my bed while someone else shoots themself in the head… am I murdering them or are they commiting suicide? If I choose to live and someone else chooses to die am I murdering them?
English
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

Murder is worse than suicide

spiderking23@spiderking232
You see the red button as Murder. I see the blue button as Suicide. We are not the same.
English
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

One of the most cucked tweets I’ve ever seen lol
Renato Villanueva@_renatov
Low key bummed to see this in Utah
English
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

The man RAPED CHILDREN.
LITTLE GIRLS.
HE TOOK THEIR INNOCENCE AND WRECKED THEIR LIVES.
Coinvo@Coinvo
CRAZY: 🇺🇸 DOJ admitted 47,635 Epstein files including Trump allegations, were deleted after the war with Iran started.
English
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

@PeterMcCormack “Silly employment rights”
You shouldn’t even be allowed to work with humans let alone employ them.
Ghoul
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx Ah yes because I, one person, can cut back enough to feed the starving masses by my lonesome. Am I a secret billionaire? I volunteer and donate where I can. If the people in charge did the same, I would not need to at all. The government would be blue in this, easier results.
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx You absolutely have the power, if you decided to cut back on your own non essential wants, to save a multitude of people. It is the same as with the button, but actually even easier, since you aren't even risking your own life.
English

Blue is 100% the right choice. There is no reality where all 8 billion people pick red so you have to pick blue to prevent millions from dying.
MrBeast@MrBeast
Everyone on earth takes a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press? BE HONEST.
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx Its funny how you say that, yet criminal law still charges failure to act (Guilty by omission can still end up with consequences). Because it is actively hurting. But you clearly just don't want to admit you'd be the bad guy, morally, and lawfully in this case.
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx No? Like.. words have meanings. If you just make shit up what words are supposed to mean, then one cannot hold a meaningful conversation with you. "Actively hurting" is not the same as inaction.
English
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

@rendern5000 @currydtx Bystander syndrome - Same way so many people don't act when they see something terrible happen. This is a self admission to calling yourself a malicious coward btw.
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Again, inaction, as the word implies, is not actually an action. It is not 'actively' hurting.
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx In this case, we the people do not have as much power, as with the button. But if we did - Yes, absolutely, choosing not to provide for people, is killing them. If youre stranded on an island and hog the food you dont need, from others, letting them starve. YOU'RE the bad guy lol
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Delusional. You can make the argument that society is not providing for everyone, without saying 'everyone, me included, is a murderer'.
If you really think so though, do try to sue yourself for murder in a court of law, by arguing this.
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx Yes, the answer is yes. Us as a society not dedicating resources is quietly literally textbook greed and hurting them actively lmfao.
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Just to really showcase the difference: Are you actively killing people in africa, by not choosing to do away with your own non-basic needs, and using that time and money to help them instead?
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx Both are actively hurting the chances of survival. You dont 'do nothing' by pressing red. You choose 'dont help my fellow man' which is actively hurting. Both analogies work fine lmao. Guilty by omission is still guilty bucko.
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx Not really, no. Setting fire = actively hurting. Not helping push the boat = not actively helping. There is a big difference.
Again, sabotaging is something you do actively; choosing not to pick the same side is not the same as sabotaging.
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx Are you deliberately obtuse in this? If red hits 51%, they kill the blue boat. So setting fire to the boat is a fair comparison. Saying they would not be able to push off, because of red, is also fair. Red would be directly sabotaging their attempt either way. Making red bad, lol
English

@GTXTrainPower @currydtx No, the red boat may not potentially set them on fire; the fact that there are not enough people to push the boat off the island would be the way to phrase that <50% means death for the blue boat.
Like.. where do you even get the "red sets fire to them" from?
English

@Salt_Slinger @treyton8402 And yet I make no implications of them being stuck. Simply that there will be people assuming people want to fix the boat, and that those people will die because of the cowardice of those who run.
English

@GTXTrainPower @treyton8402 Everyone on the ship is free to choose the “press this button to live” button. All these “on a ship” or “in a burning building” comparisons come with a “stuck” or “trapped” implication…they imply that some people aren’t free to choose the “get to live” button. Everyone can.
English
BritannianSpirit 리트윗함

I didn’t even realize until today that literally everyone who choses red has to say a three paragraph essay cope about why “erm actually according to game theory the red button is most optimal…” like just be honest and say you’re a pussy and don’t want to die lol
Treyton@treyton8402
Anyone who votes red button is a pussy or sociopath
English

@rendern5000 @currydtx Is this your actual take?
The real question would be more akin to, the blue boat being automatic, but needs 51% of the island to help push it off. But, the red boat may potentially set them on fire, and needs 100% of the island in complete unity to achieve the same result.
English

@currydtx Let me rephrase the scenario. You are all trapped on an island. There is no food or anything on it, so you have to escape. Luckily, there are two boats, each having room for everyone. The red boat is automatic and let's everyone that takes it escape safely.
English




