Huge Innings

261 posts

Huge Innings

Huge Innings

@Hugamugarr

Perth, Australia 가입일 Ekim 2011
58 팔로잉15 팔로워
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@ThomTommyTomtom @kevinbonham I would be pretty confident LIBs would have won a runoff with ON, purely because greens and labor voters were pretty strongly preferencing LIBs in similar seats. IND voters I suspect would also have favoured LIBs but probably to a much less degree
English
1
0
0
11
Thomistoma 🐊 🥬
Thomistoma 🐊 🥬@ThomTommyTomtom·
@kevinbonham Plurality would have handed this seat to the Liberals. A runoff between LIB and ONP can't be calculated from this data, but I'd be fascinated to see who the IND voters preferenced. 4 way contests make a good case for proportional representation.
English
1
0
1
198
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@AmberB_C @stationmum101 It's been way too long since the last expansion of the parliament (42 years), even in cities people have half the vote value they did in 1984. While this problem is felt more acutely in large remote electorates, it impacts everyone.
English
1
0
3
30
Amber BC
Amber BC@AmberB_C·
Totally agree. Large electorates can mean less access to MPs, diverse and competing local needs, and harder campaigning. This can leave remote communities feeling overlooked, with the same vote value but unequal representation experience. The electorate of Durack in WA is larger than South Australia.
Amber BC tweet media
English
3
0
4
236
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@MickAtko @greensSA I don't think greens have a chance here, but absents and provisionals do tend to favour greens > labor, also first postal batches are usually more right leaning than later batches.
English
1
0
0
35
Michael Atkinson
Michael Atkinson@MickAtko·
First batch of LegCo postals counted in Ngadjuri this morning: Labor 125 Greens 16. If this trend continues, the election night gap of Labor 4.5 quotas & Greens 1.3 will widen. The number of voters indicating preferences is small, so micros’ preferences cannot save @greensSA .
English
1
0
1
469
Bonkium Maximus
Bonkium Maximus@BonkiumMaximus·
@Hugamugarr @Maggie_Perry6 Both small jurisdictions with populations <0.5m My electorate already stretches from NSW to the outskirts of Melbourne... unsure how making that bigger gives me better representation Unsure what exactly PR is fixing... letting smaller parties or independents get elected?
English
3
0
1
153
Maggie Perry
Maggie Perry@Maggie_Perry6·
A reminder to right-wingers: The reason the Liberals and One Nation have won very few seats with a combined 40% of the vote is not because of preferential voting, but because we use single-member districts. Be useful and start calling for proportional representation!
English
16
6
162
11.3K
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@BonkiumMaximus @Maggie_Perry6 It provides more stability to popular MPs and rewards good local representation, members are less likely to be wiped out in wave elections where one party wins 80%+ of seats off 60% of the vote
English
0
0
0
16
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@BonkiumMaximus @Maggie_Perry6 You can adjust the amount of MPs per electorate based on the size, regional areas could have 1-3 members, while city electorates 5+. It fixes the problem that if you have a divided electorate, more voters are likely to get a local representative they like or at least tolerate
English
1
0
1
79
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@BonkiumMaximus @Maggie_Perry6 Not all systems of PR would remove links between the electorate and representatives, Hare-Clark (used in Tasmania and ACT) is both proportional and has electorates for local representation - you do need larger electorates to allow for multiple MP but it is way more proportional
English
1
0
4
152
Bonkium Maximus
Bonkium Maximus@BonkiumMaximus·
@Maggie_Perry6 The Senate provides the proportional representation. Proportional representation in the lower house would remove the link between the electorate and their representative and literally solve no problem Farcical that you call yourself an "election reporter"
English
3
1
13
815
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@kevinbonham I think Hammond is gonna be close, preference flows to ON in the few seats selected we have, seem to be weaker than the poll bludger projections
English
1
0
1
283
Sorceror43
Sorceror43@sorceror43·
With more pre-poll counts, Labor usually doing about the same as on election day, Libs and ON also not much change. ON's statewide primary vote lead over Libs very likely to hold. @mumbletwits @kevinbonham
English
2
0
2
172
Sorceror43
Sorceror43@sorceror43·
Two seats (Heysen and Schubert) have counted their pre-polls, and Libs performing much better on these votes than election day votes. If this pattern holds, they could overtake ON statewide.
English
2
2
17
3.3K
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@shaulamoder @NotTurnbull Port August prepoll has ON and Labor with 39%, 14% with Libs, 4% with Greens, 4% with Families. Labor ends up ahead on 2CP if the flow is anything like that in Light it won't close at all
English
1
0
1
36
CorangamiteSurvivor
CorangamiteSurvivor@NotTurnbull·
One Nation seats currently projected Any I'm missing?
CorangamiteSurvivor tweet media
English
4
0
36
4.2K
Ang
Ang@tracksuitpant·
Pour one out for the preferential voting haters
Ang tweet media
English
3
1
100
3.8K
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@shaulamoder @NotTurnbull to get ONP in front on the current numbers the flow would have to be close to even (80% of lib vote, 20% of green vote) this just doesnt seem to be happening in other similar seats
English
1
0
1
38
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@shaulamoder @NotTurnbull I did a quick estimate with ONP getting 65% of the libs vote (70% of families, 10% of greens, 35% LCA) the labor 2CP would be 52.9%
English
1
0
2
24
stranger
stranger@strangerous10·
Zero seats, yet Pauline Hanson & One Nation are about to pop champagne. Deluded or just happy to be big losers? Either way, really embarrassing for One Nation supporters tonight. #savotes
stranger tweet media
English
344
182
1.2K
45.6K
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@rickydbryan @tracksuitpant Currently in 6 seats they are leading on first preferences, they probably win 3-4 of them after preferences but it's hard to tell
English
1
0
0
80
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@shaulamoder @NotTurnbull Just checked the preference flow to ONP in Giles and Wright, it's pretty weak. I suspect labor will have no issues holding any of those seats, even Light probably isn't that close
English
1
0
1
35
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@succintreject1 @IrishPatri0t The actual model and internal interface ABC use is just as quick and accurate (if not more) I suspect they heavily limit what is publicly available to give them a competitive advantage over the other news outlets.
English
0
0
0
23
AIPAC Rocky
AIPAC Rocky@succintreject1·
@Hugamugarr @IrishPatri0t Yeah poll bludgers models are ridiculously volatile but they are transparent and usually very accurate very early. ABC is too focused on classifying seats as called or not.
English
1
0
2
110
Huge Innings
Huge Innings@Hugamugarr·
@IrishPatri0t @succintreject1 ABC does have a much better internal system more similar to poll bludger, but the publicly available website is missing a lot of the information with likely 2CP pairings often manually suppressed. Poll bludger is the best we have that is publicly available
English
1
0
5
122