manuu🇰🇪

7K posts

manuu🇰🇪

manuu🇰🇪

@Manvbai

Kenya 가입일 Aralık 2024
1.3K 팔로잉1.2K 팔로워
Rodgers Kipembe Mpuru
Rodgers Kipembe Mpuru@RodgersKipembe·
Ademba ameingililia Gachagua, amekumbushwa yeye ni Charuo.
Filipino
35
34
218
7.1K
Avalanche
Avalanche@_Error904·
@Manvbai @RodgersKipembe Ni mafala sana😂😂hawajui hii ni opportunity inakuja, kazi yao ni kujifanya woke na ni ubongolala wamejaza, hii ikihata, wahesabu miaka zingine kaka 30
Indonesia
1
0
2
13
Ayatola Kamenei Jr
Ayatola Kamenei Jr@Mtunormal·
@RodgersKipembe We all know who has mutilated the kenyan economy, and it's not gachagua. bana why all this hate towards Gachagua, bure kapisa
English
3
1
5
467
manuu🇰🇪
manuu🇰🇪@Manvbai·
@Kotsocha_ke Watu wanadanganyana hapa, ati mimi nitusi Oburu na Mbadi ndio sasa kadi ikue 'tribeless' na nionekane liberal lkn mtu hataki tukosoe Gachagua, kila mtu acheze kwa mlango yao buana ata siasa ni vitu za dunia
Indonesia
1
0
0
129
KOT Socha 🇰🇪
KOT Socha 🇰🇪@Kotsocha_ke·
Why are Mt kenya Gen Z Mad when we say that Gachagua will not be near power 2027,,I thought we are tribeless youths who need change 😅
English
12
18
85
3.1K
Masta
Masta@abuyamasta·
I knew it was a matter of time before waanze kutusi Ademba, haha. Kutetea wakenya hukua ngumu. Mjue hiyo hate imekuja juu alianza kuwaomba pesa.
Indonesia
13
14
91
4.3K
KYK 🇰🇪
KYK 🇰🇪@KijanayaKabras·
It’s like Ademba Allan wants to use Tuko Kadi initiative to con Kenyans just like Morara Kebaso and Kasmuel did. He should tell us his preferred presidential candidate rather than insulting other candidates. This guy could be a sellout. Hakuna mtu atawasho hii, kaeni rada!
English
19
14
44
1.8K
Ngazekof🇰🇪
Ngazekof🇰🇪@Mghazake·
Am a registered voter in parklands Nairobi but I want to transfer my vote to Kapseret constituency Oscar Sudi lazima aende nyumbani.🤣
English
10
62
376
5.7K
FERDINAND OMONDI
FERDINAND OMONDI@FerdyOmondi·
Kenya’s rush into a 2,000MW nuclear plant in Siaya is a historic mistake in the making – economically, environmentally, and strategically. First, context. Kenya already gets about 85–90% of its electricity from clean sources: geothermal, hydro, wind and increasingly solar. We are a global poster child for clean power without nuclear. Our main challenge isn’t a lack of clean options. We aren’t planning and using what we have well enough. So why gamble billions on the most complex, riskiest option on the menu? A single 2,000MW nuclear plant is one of the largest, most expensive projects in our history. These plants are notorious for cost overruns and delays in far richer, more technically advanced countries. If it runs late (very likely) or goes over budget (almost guaranteed), someone has to pay. That “someone” is Kenyan taxpayers and electricity consumers. We risk locking ourselves into decades of high tariffs or more public debt to service a mega‑project we didn’t actually need. Meanwhile, the opportunity cost is massive. For the same money, Kenya could add thousands of megawatts of geothermal, wind and solar across multiple counties, plus storage and transmission to stabilise the grid. Geothermal alone, in the Rift Valley, can provide 24/7 baseload power without importing fuel – and we’ve already shown we know how to do it. Wind in Turkana, solar in the north and east, small hydro, battery storage: these are proven, modular, quicker to build, and spread economic benefits more widely than one giant plant in Siaya. Then there’s the risk profile. Nuclear accidents are rare, but when they go wrong, they go very wrong and last for generations. Putting a first‑ever nuclear plant on Lake Victoria, which supports millions of people across several countries, is a huge regional gamble. Even “minor” incidents or perceived risk can devastate fisheries, tourism, and local livelihoods. Radioactive waste is a 100‑year question in a political system that struggles to manage five‑year projects without scandal. Do we really trust our current institutions to run a flawless nuclear safety culture for the next century? Governance is the elephant in the room. Nuclear is the kind of project that attracts opaque deals, expensive foreign contractors, complex technology transfer promises, and huge procurement contracts. In a country where big infrastructure routinely raises questions about corruption and value for money, adding nuclear’s complexity is like pouring petrol on a smouldering fire. Once we sign, we are locked in – to a vendor, to a technology, to a repayment schedule – regardless of how our economy or technology options evolve. Strategically, it also makes little sense. The world is moving towards flexible, distributed, renewables‑heavy systems supported by storage and smart grids. Nuclear is the opposite: big, centralised, inflexible units that must run almost all the time to be economical. On a grid like Kenya’s, where demand is still growing and industrialisation is uneven, dropping 2,000MW of inflexible baseload can actually complicate balancing, especially when we add more variable wind and solar. We risk building a system that is technically elegant on paper but financially and operationally brittle in reality. Kenya’s climate and geography give us an embarrassment of renewable riches: untapped geothermal reservoirs, some of the best wind regimes on the continent, abundant solar irradiation, and room for regional power trade. Instead of doubling down on what works and scaling it smartly, we are flirting with the most capital‑intensive, politically risky, institution‑demanding technology available. It’s like bypassing a field full of ripe maize to plant a single, exotic crop we’ve never grown before, which only matures if the weather is perfect for 20 years. If our goal is cheap, reliable, climate‑friendly power that supports jobs and industry, the answer is to go deeper on what we’re already good at: – Aggressively expand geothermal as firm baseload. – Add more wind and solar, especially near demand centres. – Invest in storage, transmission, and regional interconnectors. – Fix governance, planning, and utility finances so that Kenyans actually feel the benefit on their bills. Nuclear might have a place someday in a much larger, richer, more industrialised Kenya with rock‑solid institutions. But right now, when we are already at 85%+ clean power and sitting on huge untapped renewable potential, a 2,000MW nuclear plant is not visionary at all. It’s a high‑risk distraction. Our focus should be on making Kenya the first truly renewables‑powered industrial economy in Africa, not a test case for big nuclear on Lake Victoria.
NTV Kenya@ntvkenya

Ruto: Kenya plans to commence construction of a 2,000MW nuclear power plant in Siaya County next year, with commissioning of the project expected in 2034. To the people of Siaya, I invite you to be partners in this journey.

English
176
103
235
122.6K
manuu🇰🇪
manuu🇰🇪@Manvbai·
@Evanceodero622 @HassanMcOjwang Then atwara nosefwenyo ni to persuade jaluo to do the donkey work,you attack issues from fairness and morality angle,then uongeze 'wameua watu,wameua wakenya' na tuemotions,..buana govts kill pple worldwide,even the next govt will kill pple
English
0
0
0
4
Vance
Vance@Evanceodero622·
@Manvbai @HassanMcOjwang Nono ma Baba notemo fight mondo fairness obedi maotho ka fairness no onge omiyo an de na Trevor boys no do winjo matek sana,fairness owene Yesu ok kae
Filipino
1
0
0
4
JaHomaBay
JaHomaBay@HassanMcOjwang·
Trevor Ombija should have been professional though. I think he was too negative and went to that interview with a formed opinion. Ramogi TV can do better there. I want to see how he interviews Ruto so I can make a decision but again he is going for Nyakach MP, he must be seen to be doing his job. Journalism should be professional and fair.
English
32
29
254
20.6K
Jamumbo
Jamumbo@omondi_asher·
@SankeiSaitoti Trevor asked uncomfortable questions the Luo people wanted to hear. The interview was about Luos not any other tribe. Ngoja interview yenu mpake Gachagua mafuta
English
2
0
4
173
SANKEI🇰🇪
SANKEI🇰🇪@SankeiSaitoti·
Trevor Ombija is the true definition of Githeri media. What a shame, very emotional and biased.
English
24
159
789
9.1K
King of X
King of X@KingOffX_·
The Iranian regime is walking straight into a U.S. trap by rejecting the proposal. Let me explain, if the U.S. sent in ground troops without a clear trigger, like Iran rejecting a 15-point ceasefire, the global backlash would tilt toward Iran. Trump knows that. He’s set it up so that if Iran refuses, he has the pretext to escalate to save the people of Iran, if it accepts, Washington still comes out ahead. Either way, the regime loses.
Open Source Intel@Osint613

BREAKING 🔴🔴 Iran State TV: Iran has rejected the U.S. 15-point plan.

English
272
128
1.1K
191.4K