NetworkAffects

1.2K posts

NetworkAffects banner
NetworkAffects

NetworkAffects

@NAffects

Andrew Lowenthal | Digital Civil Liberties | CEO: https://t.co/n8cTk3Yegj |

가입일 Şubat 2023
388 팔로잉8K 팔로워
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Jay Bhattacharya
Jay Bhattacharya@DrJBhattacharya·
Huzzah! The consent decree in Missouri v. Biden is a historic victory for free speech in the US. Though I had to switch to the government side in the case after I became NIH director, I've never been more pleased by "losing" in my life. A huge win for all Americans.
Eric Schmitt@Eric_Schmitt

We just won Missouri v. Biden. As Missouri’s Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families — censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent “misinformation” while they pushed their narrative on the American people. Today, after years of unrelenting litigation, we deep state into a historic 10-year, court-enforceable Consent Decree. It directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment. No more coercion. No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech. Missouri struck first—and Missouri won big. This is the first real, operational restraint on the federal censorship machine. It locks in the First Amendment principle we fought for: modern technology doesn’t erase your rights, and government labels don’t strip speech of protection. The deep state just got checked. For every working Missouri family tired of being silenced by their own government: this victory is yours. The heartland fought back, and the heartland delivered.

English
138
1.5K
7.9K
243.5K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Jeffrey A Tucker
Jeffrey A Tucker@jeffreytucker·
On Missouri v. Biden, you can read the Consent Decree for yourself. It is a mutual agreement, and such things are never clean and overwhelming victories. The plaintiffs have the edge, 51% vs 49%, that is true. And that is good, even wonderful. But don't look for a rousing victory for the first amendment. You won't find it. It's the best the plaintiffs could get and good for them. N.B. the victors on both sides are the lawyers. nclalegal.org/filing/exhibit…
English
6
31
136
6.2K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
FIRE
FIRE@TheFIREorg·
Government jawboning is wrong — whether the pressure is coming from a Republican administration or a Democratic one. While this settlement may provide some limited protection and is a step in the right direction, much more needs to be done to limit jawboning. Congress must pass legislation to end the practice for good by allowing Americans to hold federal officials personally accountable in court for censoring their speech through jawboning. Congress must also increase transparency in the government’s communications to social media companies and other speech platforms so that Americans are not left in the dark when their speech is censored by federal officials behind closed doors. How? We have some thoughts. ⬇️ fire.org/news/governmen…
FIRE tweet media
English
3
38
116
5.1K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
In 2023, Missouri sued Biden’s admin for colluding with Big Tech to censor speech. I signed Missouri's amicus brief. We won! @CDCgov, @Surgeon_General, & @CISAgov can no longer deplatform First Amendment-protected speech. Congrats to @SenEricSchmitt for leading the fight!
Thomas Massie tweet media
English
166
869
4.5K
71.5K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
New Civil Liberties Alliance
BREAKING: NCLA reaches historic settlement in Missouri v. Biden, striking a major blow against government-induced social media censorship. CDC, CISA and the U.S. Surgeon General are now barred from threatening social media companies into censoring constitutionally protected speech on their platforms. This is a major First Amendment victory earned by our clients @AaronKheriatyMD and Jill Hines of @HealthFreedomLA
New Civil Liberties Alliance tweet media
English
25
156
576
46.5K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Aaron Kheriaty
Aaron Kheriaty@AaronKheriatyMD·
BREAKING: I am delighted to report that we finally achieved victory today in Missouri v. Biden, our case challenging government censorship on social media. CDC, CISA and the U.S. Surgeon General are now barred from threatening social media companies into censoring constitutionally protected speech on their platforms. Details here in the press release... nclalegal.org/press_release/…
English
163
1.3K
5.4K
217.9K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Eric Schmitt
Eric Schmitt@Eric_Schmitt·
We just won Missouri v. Biden. As Missouri’s Attorney General, I sued the Biden regime for brazenly colluding with Big Tech to silence Missouri families — censoring the truth about COVID, the Hunter Biden laptop, the open border, and the 2020 election. They tried to turn Facebook, X, YouTube, and the rest into their private speech police, labeling dissent “misinformation” while they pushed their narrative on the American people. Today, after years of unrelenting litigation, we deep state into a historic 10-year, court-enforceable Consent Decree. It directly binds the Surgeon General, the CDC, and CISA: no more threats of legal, regulatory, or economic punishment. No more coercion. No more unilateral direction or veto of platform decisions to remove, suppress, deplatform, or algorithmically bury protected speech. Missouri struck first—and Missouri won big. This is the first real, operational restraint on the federal censorship machine. It locks in the First Amendment principle we fought for: modern technology doesn’t erase your rights, and government labels don’t strip speech of protection. The deep state just got checked. For every working Missouri family tired of being silenced by their own government: this victory is yours. The heartland fought back, and the heartland delivered.
Eric Schmitt tweet media
English
1.9K
13.5K
51.4K
1.8M
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Efrat Fenigson
Efrat Fenigson@efenigson·
Australia Is the World's Lab Rat for Internet Censorship Andrew Lowenthal (@NAffects) exposes how Australia quietly became the world's testing ground for digital censorship and now it's exporting that model globally. From age verification laws to misinformation bills, he breaks down how "safety" rhetoric is being used to hand governments sweeping power over online speech. And the scariest part? The UK, EU, and California are already taking notes. Full episode below.
Efrat Fenigson@efenigson

🎙️ Why Censorship Is A Panic Response Ep. 126 with @NAffects Andrew Lowenthal is CEO of Liber-net and an Australian digital civil liberties researcher with over 25 years in human rights and technology. He led Engaged Media, worked with Matt Taibbi on the Twitter Files, and mapped the censorship industrial complex for Racket News. Andrew writes about digital authoritarianism, surveillance, and free expression. Recently he testified before the EU Parliament and continues exposing how legacy institutions bleeding trust respond with censorship rather than transparency. → Please like, comment, share & follow — to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 01:17 - Intro to Andrew Lowenthal 03:30 - Censorship Status in USA, Australia, UK, Europe 08:50 - The Political Shift in Australia & “One Nation” Party 13:05 - Ad-Break: Ledn & Trezor 19:05 - Australia's Age Verification Law & Substack's Voluntary Compliance 23:11 - The New Hate Speech Law, Bondi Attack & Gov. Overreach 33:00 - Australia’s Hate Speech Laws History 36:55 - Ad-Break: Abundant Mines & New Totalitarian Order Conference 39:14 - Mapping the Censorship Industrial Complex 45:20 - Speech Police Via NGOs & Government Funding 50:10 - Australia’s e-Safety Office: Policing Speech & Node In Global Censorship Industrial Complex 59:40 - Australia’s Economical Downturn & Recession 1:01:50 - Censorship As Part of UN’s Agenda 2030 1:04:49 - 2017 Council of Europe Document & Germany Censorship Analysis 1:11:11 - Are Speech Crimes Now Treated On Par With Violent Crimes? 1:17:23 - Bitcoin & Nostr: Decentralized, Censorship Resistant Protocols 1:22:54 - The End Game: Keeping Legacy Parties in Power 1:28:30 - Follow Andrew's Work

English
4
29
57
7K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Efrat Fenigson
Efrat Fenigson@efenigson·
🎙️ Why Censorship Is A Panic Response Ep. 126 with @NAffects Andrew Lowenthal is CEO of Liber-net and an Australian digital civil liberties researcher with over 25 years in human rights and technology. He led Engaged Media, worked with Matt Taibbi on the Twitter Files, and mapped the censorship industrial complex for Racket News. Andrew writes about digital authoritarianism, surveillance, and free expression. Recently he testified before the EU Parliament and continues exposing how legacy institutions bleeding trust respond with censorship rather than transparency. → Please like, comment, share & follow — to help me beat the suppressing algo's. Thank you! 00:00 - Coming Up... 01:17 - Intro to Andrew Lowenthal 03:30 - Censorship Status in USA, Australia, UK, Europe 08:50 - The Political Shift in Australia & “One Nation” Party 13:05 - Ad-Break: Ledn & Trezor 19:05 - Australia's Age Verification Law & Substack's Voluntary Compliance 23:11 - The New Hate Speech Law, Bondi Attack & Gov. Overreach 33:00 - Australia’s Hate Speech Laws History 36:55 - Ad-Break: Abundant Mines & New Totalitarian Order Conference 39:14 - Mapping the Censorship Industrial Complex 45:20 - Speech Police Via NGOs & Government Funding 50:10 - Australia’s e-Safety Office: Policing Speech & Node In Global Censorship Industrial Complex 59:40 - Australia’s Economical Downturn & Recession 1:01:50 - Censorship As Part of UN’s Agenda 2030 1:04:49 - 2017 Council of Europe Document & Germany Censorship Analysis 1:11:11 - Are Speech Crimes Now Treated On Par With Violent Crimes? 1:17:23 - Bitcoin & Nostr: Decentralized, Censorship Resistant Protocols 1:22:54 - The End Game: Keeping Legacy Parties in Power 1:28:30 - Follow Andrew's Work
English
3
23
53
14.6K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Paul D. Thacker
Paul D. Thacker@thackerpd·
1) BRITS SPIED ON ME ACCORDING TO MEMO MARKED “STRICTLY PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL”. A Labour Party lied to me when I asked if I was one of the reporters. I'm releasing Labour's memo where I'm a "significant person of interest."
Paul D. Thacker tweet media
English
10
259
542
42.9K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Matt Taibbi
Matt Taibbi@mtaibbi·
How Politicians Smear The World, Vol. 1: The Contract As the scandal involving British spying on journalists deepens, we're learning more about connections to earlier scandals in the U.S. and beyond. Part One in a Series racket.news/p/how-politici…
English
20
289
858
52.1K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
NetworkAffects
NetworkAffects@NAffects·
And McSweeney is the co-founder of censorship organisation the Center for Countering Digital Hate. Control the information domain, control the politics, control the country.
Prem Sikka@premnsikka

Peter Mandelson was directly involved in helping Morgan McSweeney select Labour’s parliamentary candidates ahead of the 2024 general election. This is despite his past misbehaviour. It was all part of the purge of the left and push Labour to the right. archive.ph/FXGiY

English
0
0
2
298
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Fabio De Masi 🦩
Fabio De Masi 🦩@FabioDeMasi·
Der Forscher Andrew Lowenthal (Fellow am Berkman Center for Internet and Society der Harvard University) hat in den USA das Zusammenspiel aus Geheimdiensten, Regierungsstellen und digitalen Plattformen untersucht. Jetzt hat er sich Deutschland vorgenommen. Es geht um «Meldestellen» und private, aber staatlich mitfinanzierte NGO.
Fabio De Masi 🦩 tweet mediaFabio De Masi 🦩 tweet mediaFabio De Masi 🦩 tweet mediaFabio De Masi 🦩 tweet media
Deutsch
24
175
487
9.6K
NetworkAffects 리트윗함
Pavel Durov
Pavel Durov@durov·
Today, Telegram notified all its users in Spain with this alert: Pedro Sánchez’s government is pushing dangerous new regulations that threaten your internet freedoms. Announced just yesterday, these measures could turn Spain into a surveillance state under the guise of “protection.” Here’s why they’re a red flag for free speech and privacy: 1. Ban on social media for under-16s with mandatory age verification: This isn’t just about kids—it requires platforms to use strict checks, like needing IDs or biometrics. ⚠️ Danger: It sets a precedent for tracking EVERY user’s identity, eroding anonymity and opening doors to mass data collection. What starts with minors could expand to all, stifling open discourse. 2. Personal and criminal liability for platform executives: If “illegal, hateful, or harmful” content isn’t removed fast enough, bosses face jail. ⚠️ Danger: This will force over-censorship—platforms will delete anything remotely controversial to avoid risks, silencing political dissent, journalism, and everyday opinions. Your voice could be next if it challenges the status quo. 3. Criminalizing algorithm amplification: Amplifying “harmful” content via algorithms becomes a crime. ⚠️ Danger: Governments will dictate what you see, burying opposing views and creating echo chambers controlled by the state. Free exploration of ideas? Gone—replaced by curated propaganda. 4. “Hate and polarization footprint” tracking: Platforms must monitor and report how they “fuel division.” ⚠️ Danger: Vague definitions of “hate” could label criticism of the government as divisive, leading to shutdowns or fines. This can be a tool for suppressing opposition. These aren’t safeguards; they’re steps toward total control. We’ve seen this playbook before—governments weaponizing “safety” to censor critics. On Telegram, we prioritize your privacy and freedom: strong encryption, no backdoors, and resistance to overreach. ✊ Stay vigilant, Spain. Demand transparency and fight for your rights. Share this widely—before it’s too late.
English
2.6K
11.2K
38.8K
3M