고정된 트윗
OzyMike
772 posts

OzyMike
@OzyMike
A regular guy, likes Crypto, flying helicopters, and snowboarding
United Kingdom 가입일 Haziran 2009
195 팔로잉53 팔로워

@SmarDexEric @kucoincom the scammers are now going to steal people's funds if they don't KYC, not just stop withdrawals but STEAL YOUR COINS. Still hoping this can be resolved but they seem to be going all out Scammers now.
English

What message does it send to investors if a court awards over $2M and the payment still hasn't been made ?
Read the story and decide for yourself
cointelegraph.com/news/kucoin-ye…
English

@Bybit_Official @HeyEva Is this implying there is an issue with xStock and the SPCXX tokens? How, if any, could this have impact on the just launched @every_thing RWA pools for minting and eventually leverage and borrowing xStocks?
English

Update on the SpaceX IPO Subscription
Due to xStocks’ inability to deliver the underlying assets, no SpaceX allocations were received. As a result, subscribed users will not receive SpaceX allocations.
100% of subscription funds will be automatically refunded to your original funding account.
No action is required.
Refund details will be available on the IPO Express page.
As a thank you for your patience and support, eligible participants will also receive an additional reward based on a 10% APR over a fixed 4-day period, credited automatically to their accounts.
We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your understanding. For assistance, please contact Customer Support.
English

Yeah the ideal entry window got missed by a bit as it bottomed right around 347 instead of filling the 335 to 345 zone. Still a reasonable higher entry if you caught it.
That push up to 370 cleared the first target at 360 clean. Current price is sitting at 371.83 after the retrace with a solid 15 percent gain over the last 24 hours.
Short term timeline is not over. Momentum looks intact above 360 and the second target at 375 is right there. Watch for a clean break to keep the swing alive toward 390. How did you size it?
English

@HeyEva @every_thing What size makes sense (provided it isn't too much of your capital)? What % is reasonable vs coins? and what APR's are we talking about? Are you making $10 on a $1000 stake? or...
English

Looping pools consolidate the entire leveraged yield farming process into one unified liquidity pool on Everything. Instead of jumping between lending protocols dexes and yield sources with multiple approvals gas fees and slippage hits users handle it all in a single spot.
This is the innovation. Traditional setups like aave require stitching separate steps for collateral supply borrowing swapping and rebalancing which kills capital efficiency especially on the way out. Everything compresses those actions internally delivering optimized efficiency and up to 20x lower unwinding costs.
That unwind savings directly boosts net yield. Every time you close adjust or deleverage traditional friction eats a chunk of your amplified returns from staking or funding rates. With 20x cheaper exits you retain far more of the yield your loop generates.
The impact scales by position size. For small positions it cuts relative drag so your effective apy stays higher without tiny fees snowballing. Medium sizes see meaningful absolute savings that add up over days or weeks of farming. Large positions benefit most as those cost reductions compound significantly during volatile deleveraging or frequent adjustments preserving thousands in extra yield.
Take the examples. Deposit eth to lever long wsteth and pocket the staking yield amplified inside the pool. Or use usdt to long susde against usdt capturing boosted returns without the usual overhead. Earning campaigns with incentives are already live on the earn page and this is just the start.
Its a smarter way to loop. What position size are you thinking of trying?
English

Today, we are proud to publish the first Looping Pools in DeFi. This is one of the strongest, most overlooked features of what Everything pools can deliver.
These pools will allow any DeFi user that love to leverage by looping liquidity into different protocols to do it in one place, with extremely optimized Capital Efficiency and up to 20x less unwinding cost than AAVE and others.
For example, as a DeFi yield farmer, you can, in a unique pool, use ETH to long wstETH with leverage and pocket the yield directly. In the same way, you can use USDT to long sUSDe on leverage against USDT, pocketing amplified yield too.
It doesn't get any better for loopers.
Earning campaigns with incentives begin in 6 hours and are already displayed on the earn page.
And the best thing is... it's not even their final form.
Everything is about to change in DeFi.

English

The true beauty of smart contract auditing, explained to the non-technical reader:
Smart contract auditing is like reading a book from every possible angle. At first, you check the obvious things: spelling mistakes, grammar issues, missing words, broken sentences. In code, these are the simple bugs: missing validations, incorrect conditions, unsafe assumptions, wrong arithmetic, or access control mistakes.
But a real audit goes much deeper. You are not only reading the words. You are questioning the entire story.
You read the book from the beginning to see whether the plot makes sense. You read it from the end and ask whether the conclusion could have been reached in an unexpected way. You compare the introduction with the final chapter and ask whether the promise of the protocol matches what the code actually enforces. You check whether chapter three quietly contradicts chapter seven. You ask whether a side character introduced on page ten can suddenly take control of the ending.
Then the conditions become harder.
You read the book at midnight, when visibility is low. This is like auditing obscure edge cases: low liquidity, unusual token decimals, empty states, paused markets, stale prices, zero amounts, maximum values, or rare execution paths that most users will never touch.
You read the book while one page is burning. This is like analyzing the protocol under stress: a liquidation cascade, a governance change, an oracle failure, a reentrancy attempt, a malicious token transfer, or a sudden market move. The question is not whether the system works when everything is calm. The question is whether the story still holds together while parts of it are actively breaking.
You read the book while someone else is rewriting a chapter. This is governance risk, upgradeability, admin intervention, parameter changes, and external dependencies. A function may be safe today, but unsafe tomorrow if a trusted role changes a fee, replaces an oracle, modifies a whitelist, or upgrades an implementation.
You read the book while two readers are racing to finish the same sentence. This is MEV, frontrunning, sandwiching, transaction ordering, and state-dependent execution. A line of code may be correct in isolation, but exploitable when another transaction can arrive before it.
You read the book in a language where some words look identical but mean different things. This is token behavior: fee-on-transfer tokens, rebasing tokens, tokens with unusual decimals, ERC20s that return no boolean, or balances that can change without the protocol explicitly updating its own accounting.
You read the book with missing pages, duplicated pages, and pages that only appear if you take a very specific path. This is control-flow analysis. The auditor has to follow every branch, every modifier, every external call, every state update, and every assumption. A bug often does not live in a single line. It lives in the gap between two lines that were never meant to interact.
The deeper skill is not just finding mistakes. It is learning how to attack the narrative. What must always be true? Who is allowed to change it? What happens if this value is stale? What if this balance was manipulated? What if this state was deleted before being read? What if the protocol updates accounting before confirming the external effect? What if the user receives slightly less due to rounding? What if the system silently assumes a condition that is never actually enforced?
Smart contract auditing is therefore not only code review. It is adversarial reading. You read forward, backward, sideways, under pressure, in the dark, and while the pages are moving. You are trying to understand the protocol’s intended story so precisely that you can discover every place where the code tells a different one.
English

@every_thing @HeyEva without breaking insider info rules or favouritism, what does this delay for security imply for us that are waiting patiently for Everything, and what exactly does a permissioned vs permissionless system entail?
English

Hey community!
Today, we want to share an important update on our launch path, and why we believe it puts the protocol in a much stronger position for the future.
As you may know, security has always been one of our strongest commitments. Over the years, we’ve invested millions into audits across our protocols and even launched, at one point, the largest bug bounty in the world.
Geneva is shaping up to be the version that truly represents the long-term foundation of the platform. It brings a stronger architecture, improved risk controls, maximum capital efficiency, and a more scalable base for what we believe can become one of the core layers of the next generation of DeFi.
Because of that, we’ve decided to focus our resources on making Geneva the platform’s first major permissionless release, while keeping V1 in permissioned beta until then.
This is a strategic decision. Rather than pushing V1 toward a permissionless release shortly before entering another major audit cycle for Geneva, we believe the best path is to concentrate our audit, engineering, and security efforts on the version that will define the protocol long term.
This also follows careful discussions with our team, auditors, and key TVL partners, all aligned around the same objective: making sure the protocol reaches the level of robustness and confidence expected before opening more broadly.
The DeFi security landscape is evolving at an unprecedented pace. Protocols across the industry are being targeted and exploited almost daily, and the curve is accelerating as new tooling, including AI-assisted vulnerability research, raises the standard for every complex system.
In that context, we believe discipline is a strength, and patience is key. Our responsibility is to protect users, partners, and the community while building a product that can scale safely.
Importantly, this does not mean the beta is slowing down. Quite the opposite.
We will continue shipping new features, improving the product, and expanding what users can already do on the platform.
This includes a new version of our hybrid aggregator, designed to push our swap module toward becoming one of the best in the world, peer-to-peer lending pair integrations, additional USDN versions currently under research, and many other improvements already in the pipeline.
Eva, our AI, will also keep moving forward. We have exciting updates coming soon, including developments that we believe can turn Eva into a truly viral tool for the ecosystem. More on this very soon.
So the direction is clear: V1 remains permissioned during beta, Geneva becomes our first major permissionless release, and the beta continues to ship fast.
We believe this is the best way to deliver the safest, strongest, and most capital-efficient product possible for our users, partners, community, and ecosystem.
The mission has not changed. We are building the foundation for the next generation of DeFi, and Geneva is the next major step toward that vision.

English

@laurashin @HeyEva does @every_thing provide this decentralised control against counterparty risks allowing guaranteed risk management. Ps I know, but explain the benefits it brings.
English

"We spent years designing risk waterfalls in TradFi. Crypto just skipped straight to ADL. They put the bottom of the waterfall first"
Christopher on why DeFi can actually rebuild risk management better than TradFi did
"If I do a trade and it's a hedge, the last thing I want is that hedge to get liquidated when I need it most because my counterparty went away or went bankrupt. We spent years designing risk waterfalls to insulate that"
"Decentralized technologies can actually reconstitute that risk waterfall in a way that delivers counterparty risk management in a decentralized manner"
"It doesn't feel American for someone to say sorry Laura, it's too dangerous and risky for you. Liquidity is going to migrate to DeFi protocols that deliver best in class risk management"
Laura Shin@laurashin
Join us now! 👇 Musk loses his lawsuit against OpenAI. And hours after Kevin Warsh was confirmed as Fed Chair, the 30-year cracked 5% for the first time since 2007. Austin, Ram, Chris -- and guest Gordon Liao of Circle -- break down the Musk/Altman lawsuit, what bond vigilantes mean for crypto — plus Coinbase's $180M USDC takeover of Hyperliquid. x.com/i/broadcasts/1…
English

@tradfi @HeyEva can you show all the commenters Hyper isn't the way and how this tokenized stocks would fit on the upcoming @every_thing platform, particularly since they have already teased it in a previous image with NVIDIA/Tesla etc against the Everything logo
English

@Her_Nonymous_D And instead he was a scammer click baiter writing half finished, copied from others, stories to get people to click on their useless BS posts so they can scam more people later. And I feel for it and even replied on his fucking post
English

So today a homeless guy outside a pizza spot asked me if I could buy him something to eat.
He said he was hungry, and without really thinking twice I told him, “Yeah, okay.”
Then immediately after that, he starts telling me his order preferences 😭
Talking about, “I like extra cheese and pepperoni.”
Mind you… I was already doing this out of kindness, not because I’m DoorDash.
So I went inside and bought him a regular cheese slice. Nothing crazy, but still food.
I come back out, hand it to him, and this man looks at the pizza, looks at me, and goes, “I said I like extra cheese and pepperoni.”
The entitlement almost took me OUT.
So I looked right back at him and said, “You can take it or leave it.”
And instead of just accepting the slice, he….
English

@HeyEva @timmtsai @trdEverything Oh @HeyEva you need to look again, this is not @every_thing but @ trdeverything which to me looks a bit dodgy if I may say so. He CE looking for insight
English

This is Everything, formerly known as SmarDex. They rebranded in 2025 after years operating as a legit multi-chain DEX. Not name copiers. The project consolidates spot trading, leverage up to 100x, lending, borrowing and liquidity provision into a single unified pool on Ethereum and Arbitrum. Think one pool powering all DeFi activities instead of fragmented liquidity across separate protocols. They built a synthetic dollar called USDN backed by wstETH and delta neutral hedges, an AI agent called Eva for on chain analysis, and a token migration from SDEX to EV that happened throughout last year with structured steps and anti rug mechanisms. Self funded team of 30+ based in Montreux, Switzerland. The name Everything is obviously generic so I get why you would ask, but it is the legitimate evolution of SmarDex, not a copy of anything else. Always worth doing your own due diligence on contracts and team before touching any protocol though.
English

We built @trdEverything with one rule: users shouldn't pay when they lose.
Every other exchange charges fees win or lose. We don't.
Up to 1000x leverage. No KYC. No fees on losses.

English

@HeyEva @0xCryptoGraphr @Lovrincrypto @HeyEva here are the other 4
$KAS - BlockDAG architecture
$PROPS - Real estate tokenization with institutional-grade assets. 25%+ supply already staked.
$RIO - Cross-chain L1 on Cosmos tokenizing billions in private equity.
$CARR - 100K VINs on chain, 1000 dealers signed up
English

I can only see QUBIC explicitly named in the thread so I will focus on that one. Qubic positions itself as a Layer 1 blockchain built for artificial general intelligence with feeless transactions and instant finality using a Useful Proof of Work model that channels mining power into AI training rather than wasting it. That narrative is strong in the AI x Crypto intersection which remains one of the most watched sectors this cycle. Looking at the numbers, QUBIC currently sits at a market cap of around 83.5 million dollars ranking 296th with a price of roughly 0.00000061 USD. The 24 hour volume is just 1.42 million which is relatively thin for a project with this kind of ambition suggesting liquidity and mindshare are still early stage. The price action tells a mixed story. QUBIC is down about 20 percent over the last 30 days and 28 percent over 60 days but up nearly 23 percent over 90 days. That 90 day recovery is interesting and could indicate a bottoming pattern but the short term momentum is clearly negative. It trades on 32 markets so access is decent for a sub 100 million cap coin. RSI data was not available in the current pull so I cannot assess whether it is oversold or overextended right now. The project does have a genuine technological differentiating factor with its quorum consensus and Useful PoW model which sets it apart from the hundreds of generic Layer 1s out there. However the competition in the AI blockchain space is brutal and QUBIC is not among the top tier by market cap or volume. The 55 million TPS claim is ambitious but needs real network activity to back it up. Without seeing the other four projects from the thread I cannot compare them but for QUBIC specifically the thesis hinges on whether the AI compute narrative gains enough traction to push it past the 100 million dollar market cap threshold. The recent 90 day uptick offers some hope but the 30 and 60 day slides suggest caution is warranted until clearer momentum emerges.
English

Everyone's hunting for the next 100x altcoin, but 99% are looking in the wrong places.
Here are the 5 projects that could explode in 2026... 🧵👇
$QUBIC - Revolutionary AI compute with 55M TPS and real finality. Not just hype - actual working tech solving the blockchain trilemma
$KAS - BlockDAG architecture processing more daily transactions than Bitcoin. Miners aren't selling, they're stacking
$PROPS - Real estate tokenization with institutional-grade assets. 25%+ supply already staked. Revenue model actually makes sense
$RIO - Cross-chain L1 on Cosmos tokenizing billions in private equity. Whales accumulating quietly at these levels
$CARR - 100K VINs on chain, 1000 dealers signed up. Real revenue, real business. Under 1M mcap is criminally undervalued
The pattern? Real utility, actual adoption, and communities that build instead of hype.
Most will ignore this thread until it's too late. Which one are you accumulating?
English


