PapiChulo

@RedWavePress Everyone’s titled to their opinion and if they have a platform, they can use it. Doesn’t mean you have to agree. Stop being soft ass sissy mfers. If you don’t like it, don’t watch

Actor Josh Duhamel: “Just because you have a platform doesn't mean you get to preach to everybody.” Megyn Kelly: “Ahh, thank you! Tell that to the Oscars.” Josh Duhamel: “I spend a lot of time in the Midwest, so I get to see what they actually think about us, and they’re not afraid to tell me.” “About 10 years ago… [a buddy] meets me at the airport with a t-shirt that says, ‘Nobody cares what actors think.’ And I was like, ‘D*mn that’s really funny. That’s really good.’” 
“That has always stuck with me because it’s true.”

@kishelap @townbrad This is facts. Wish every airport was set up this way.

@townbrad Because DFW has 5 different Terminals with each having their own entry and many TSA check points in each Terminal. It’s almost like a Decentralized system.

No idea why DFW Airport appears immune to the TSA mess across the country, but very appreciative to have literally zero wait today. Also highly recommend TSA Pre-Check Touchless ID if you haven’t enrolled.

@DallasTexasTV Looks like shit hahaha

A lap around the Grand Prix of Arlington

@JJWatt Tips were meant for those paid on tips, if you are paid hourly, I don’t give a tip unless I’m feeling generous or you did something that compelled me to give you one.

Genuine question on a restaurant situation: You walk up to a counter to order. You find your own table and seat yourself. If you order coffee, they hand you a cup and you go fill it up yourself. If you order food, they hand you a buzzer and when it goes off, you go pick it up yourself. The iPad has a “20%, 25%, 30%, Other” tip option, with 20% already preselected. What’s your move?

@CELLPHONECRYING That Gen literally wore this style growing up. The younger gen’s think they invented their style hahahaha

how people expect you to dress as soon as you turn 30

@mikitaposts “Visit” lmaoooooooo

I will not fall for the anti-cruise ship psyop. You pay like $1000 and you get to visit 4 or 5 different countries within one week while having endless food and entertainment.

@unlimited_ls Old school parenting of others kids. Need more of this. Kid wasn’t hurt, and guy didn’t intend to hurt him. The kid found out there our repercussions in life. Too many kids these days push the limits because they know the opposing party won’t do anything.

NEW: Colorado CEO who grabbed a teen by the neck and threw him to the floor after the boy splashed water on his wife at In-N-Out Burger has been sentenced Lucas Kalisher, 57, was sentenced to 30 months of probation for an attack on Aug. 4, 2024 Kalisher initially faced felony second-degree assault with strangulation and misdemeanor child abuse charges As part of the deal, he must complete an anger management evaluation and treatment, write an apology letter, perform 120 hours of community service, and pay restitution If he violates probation, he could face a class 5 felony charge carrying one to three years in prison, parole, and a $100,000 fine

@ismellbuttts @Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport You wrote it as if it were verbatim. If you’re interpreting intent, then say that, “he was implying citizens should come first.” That’s different than what you said. The insults speak for themselves, so I’m going to leave it there.

@PapiChulo2437 @Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport His direct statement was essentially their foremost duty is to American citizens, not to illegals. they couldn’t even get behind that. You’re either disingenuous or just incoherent.

BREAKING: Trump: Stand if you agree: The first duty of the American government is to protect American citizens, not illegal aliens.

@Chill02021 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport In a civic sense, yes, governments serve their citizens. But constitutionally, the limits on government power apply to “persons.” Representation and constitutional protections aren’t the same category. Does that make sense?

@Chill02021 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Sorry to tell you you’re wrong. But don’t believe me, you can read it for yourself. senate.gov/about/origins-…

@danobailey @ChillinTheMostx @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport So you’re saying this is purely a policy preference, not a constitutional principle? Because my point is that policy priorities still have to operate within constitutional limits.

@ChillinTheMostx @PapiChulo2437 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport ^this. This isn’t a constitutional debate; it’s a simpler policy question. Do you prioritize the needs of citizens over illegals. This isn’t some debate over rights. This isn’t a loaded question; it’s a simpler request of someone’s priorities.

@ismellbuttts @Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport He never uttered the word “should”. Not a matter of interpretation, but I would recommend a hearing test.

@PapiChulo2437 @Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport You’re loading it yourself by lacking interpretation ability. He said that American citizens should come FIRST, not non-citizens. They couldn’t even stand for that. Somehow you’re interpreting it as far more than it is.

@ChillinTheMostx @danobailey @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Voters can favor prioritizing citizens, that’s policy. My point was about implying a constitutional hierarchy that isn’t in the text. It’s not about my opinion; it’s about what the Constitution actually says. Separate issues.

@PapiChulo2437 @danobailey @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport He’s not quoting the constitution he’s making a statement about the priority of the American government. You didn’t answer my question, do you truly believe that American voters do not think that the US government should be prioritizing their own citizens needs?

@Whompygg @WillyDiBa7 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Due process applying to “persons” doesn’t mean no enforcement. It means the government must follow lawful procedures before removal. A final order of removal is the result of due process, that actually proves my point. Thank you.

@PapiChulo2437 @WillyDiBa7 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Ok how else will illegals get due process unless ice hunts them down? And ice is hunting down people and deporting people with final order of deportation. Like where are they not getting due process? Most deportees HAVE final order of removal. Keep crying

@ismellbuttts @Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Citizens have unique political rights, yes. But due process applies to “persons.” Conflating those two categories is what makes the question loaded. And I can vote because the constitution grants me that right, not you or your opinions.

@PapiChulo2437 @Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport It wasn’t a question, it was a statement. It also wasn’t loaded at ALL. It was simple. are American citizens owed more by their Government than non-citizens? There’s a question, and if your answer isn’t a resounding yes, then you shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

@ChillinTheMostx @danobailey @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport The Constitution doesn’t say the government’s “first duty is to protect citizens first.” That language isn’t there. It provides for the common defense and protects “persons.” There’s no priority hierarchy. Why stand for wording that misstates that?

@PapiChulo2437 @danobailey @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport No, the statement is that the government’s first duty is to American citizens first. It does not say that anyone has no protections, that’s false. Do you truly believe that voters would be upset with them for standing for that statement?

@WillyDiBa7 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Different rights doesn’t mean a hierarchy of protection. Citizens have additional political privileges, but the Constitution doesn’t rank basic protections by citizenship. Due process applies to “persons,” period.

@PapiChulo2437 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport I mean, you kinda say it yourself here. If they have some rights but not as many as citizens, then kinda by definition the priority of the government is protecting the citizens before them.

@burneraccountNS @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Because the Constitution literally defines the government’s duties and limits?

@PapiChulo2437 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport The claim was “duty is to protect American citizens” what part of that involves the constitution here…

@Hurth46891 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Not disagreeing with you. Just contesting the framing of the question. Factually, non-citizens do have protections in the constitution. It was a loaded question, thats all.

@PapiChulo2437 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Obviously every human is a human after all. No one is saying they won't be treated as humans. The citizens of our country should always come before anyone else.

@DaBearsH1M @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport Yes. Read the constitution for yourself. Not sure what to tell you. Don’t be mad at me, I didn’t write it.

@PapiChulo2437 @ShaboiUtes @LeadingReport even the ones that commit murder, rape, etc.?