Acrol ๐๐ฟโโ๏ธ
84.2K posts
@PrimateFrontier
Nigga with no bands Kindest individual you'll ever meet โค๏ธ Proclaimed Paragon of Morality #Motion Era 12/25/2023
Who wins, who dies? ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐
@mikudefbizkit @zaylusrose dawg i just want my boyfriend to call me his little sister cause i find it hot, that doesnโt mean im gonna go and sexually abuse my irl siblings, like most people i also hate my siblings
Ted Nugent is disgusted with the youth of today: "These kids need to be stripped naked and thrown into the wilderness without anything for a week. And if they don't make it, tough."
A mother reported that her 9-year-old son was given THC gummies and a vape at school. He ate the entire pack, resulting in severe symptoms that have left him unable to talk or see.
The pedophiles bundled together to brigade and community note my thread asserting it claims that it is NECESSARY to use CSAM to draw small anime girls, when it doesn't say that. Ever. This is a total strawman, which is expected of lolicon retards. If you say they're attracted to children and call them pedophiles (which they are, it's literally what a lolicon means in Japanese), they will claim you're calling them predators and demand evidence of them preying on a child. This kind of strawmanning and elevation of claims is the cornerstone of the lolicon persecution complex. If you make a thread talking about how artists use references and that if you're looking at lolicon art, you have no guarantee the artist did not use images of real children or even CSAM as reference to produce it, they will claim (as you can see in the community note) that "CSAM is NECESSARY to draw small anime girls". The only thing that is asserted is that all lolicon art is based on what real children look like, which is undeniably true. Loli characters don't look like old grandmothers or adult women. Despite being stylized, they heavily emphasize childlike features. This isn't the same as claiming all lolicon art uses photographs of real children as reference or traces photographs of real children. The whole point is that if you're willing to draw a line at Shadman draw explicit images of real children, you should reasonably be skeptical about what material the other lolicon art you look at is based on. As is stated at the end, it could even be CSAM passed through an AI filter. "But it literally never happens!" I already mention the example of Shadman in the OP, but that seemed to fly over people's heads, but there are other examples: x.com/realNikandros/โฆ I've already pointed to an example of Dorontabi, the artist responsible for the "uoooh ๐ญ๐ข correction" memes that he publicly talked about hoarding Japanese child gravure photos. x.com/P33P00peepee/sโฆ Other commenters brought up other examples like the author of Vampeerz clearly using a photo of a real child on their work. What is the number of examples I need to pull up before you accept that there is a non-zero risk that the artist behind the lolicon images you enjoy might be using real children as reference? It doesn't matter what the artist says, because they have every incentive to lie. Just like lolicons have every incentive to lie and boldly strawman me, because they know exactly what they are and refuse to accept it.
Stumbled upon one of the worst takes on Free Speech ever today.
Apparently this incest pedo defender considers this as a birthday gift because his ex and his best friend couldnโt give him one.
Iโm extra happy theyโre not adapting this story
