RubiconDerivatives

Session Level Indicator

@TechCharts Confirm on the retrace using momentum

Two edged sword... How and what can you improve in your trading system?

@Mckenziclanz @Luckshuryy @follis_ 9/21 tell you everything you need about OB and gap entries. @jtraderco JL1/2/3 are quite magical also for trend capture (or disqualification)

@RubiconTrading @Luckshuryy @follis_ what are your preferred Ema's for intraday trading and swing trading.

I will give money back to the market when we start trending again Happens every time I am good at trading ranges I am not good at trading trends

@Lordofacca This is serious animation deserving of a large audience

Down

@TechCharts HS, “patterns”…are not TA. They are bait

We around 1000 people that follow each other are seeing a H&S pattern. Algos keep pushing the variety of the same chart to each other. And then we think "everyone is seeing the pattern" it will not work. Let me tell you this: technical analysis is not a widely applied tool for making trading/investment decisions. Let alone in technical analysis there are so many methods such as elliott wave, indicator trading, trend following, cycle analysis, candlestick charting.... So, relax. The H&S that we are seeing is safe. It is not seen by many. We are minority here...

@Luckshuryy @follis_ EMA’s tell you all you need to know

I was the same, would give money back when trends would take place. Next step was to implement a system for me to identify ASAP as to when we were goin from a range bound market to a trending one. Something like one time framing for example prevents me from getting involved within unfavourable conditions.

@Tradesdontlie @tradingview My TV went blank white. What was the problem?

Claude controlling @tradingview live — switching symbols, writing Pine Script, batch scanning futures, replay trading, drawing levels. All from the terminal. Still rough edges but the vision is clear.

The main fatigue I'm getting with AI is communication fatigue Implementation is now crazy fast, but describing requirements is slow And pushing it faster leaves me knackered

@Ayy_Lien_ @VolSignals Nice one here: x.com/luckshuryy/sta…

@RubiconTrading @VolSignals Lol fvg

Wow.. so far, the futures action overnight is almost exactly as prescribed in our charm data in VS3D I almost hate when it's this good because it risks anchoring you to unrealistic expectations

@Luckshuryy Wise beyond your years. Well done 👍

I turn 24 today, a few things I wish I got told earlier about trading: > find the boring stuff exciting > curiosity = improvement > start where your trade thesis is invalidated > always know who is paying you & why > create a deep connection with one market > execution should be boring > position sizing is the highest-leverage skill > get comfortable being uncomfortable > drawdowns exist in all profitable systems > focus on trade input instead of outcome > your edge can decay, keep monitoring > trading is probabilities, never absolutes > obsession is necessary > more tools ≠ more info I think the biggest takeaway from all of this is to remain curious, without it you will never generate any new ideas, and get stuck in horrible cycles. Be open to new ideas, don't take them at face value and be willing to dig deep enough to a point where you have data to back up your thesis.

@Ayy_Lien_ @VolSignals I know right?

@Hunter_Jacques_ @jam_croissant @VolSignals

Advice from @jam_croissant from exactly a year ago (just before liberation day) from his first podcast from CBOE floor still holds true in this current environment. 0DTE options have almost zero Vega, their price is driven almost entirely by delta and gamma (actual price movement), not implied vol changes. That’s exactly why I have been avoiding holding 30/60DTE OTM puts. These have huge Vega, so even if the market drops, IV mean-reversion (crush) can destroy the premium. Exactly the way to hedge and optimize returns in the current elevated-VIX regime where longer-dated vol is expensive and prone to rapid contraction.

Another miss waiting for something instead of just reading my indicator

@steipete Your animosity is obvious at this point. Unfollow

I never use plan mode. The main reason this was added to codex is for claude-pilled people who struggle with changing their habits. just talk with your agent.

@rohanpaul_ai There is no fucking way you wrote this yourself. Unfollow.

Google proves the math for cracking Bitcoin's encryption in 9 minutes now exists — the only missing piece is the hardware. 🤯 With precomputation, an attacker could derive a private key from a public key in roughly 9 minutes. Bitcoin's average block time is 10 minutes. The core finding is precise and unsettling: Shor's algorithm can now be compiled to solve the 256-bit elliptic curve discrete logarithm problem with roughly 1,200 logical qubits and 90 million Toffoli gates. Translated to hardware, that means fewer than half a million physical superconducting qubits, nearly a 20-fold reduction over the best prior estimates from Litinski's 2023 work. It means "on-spend" attacks, where a transaction is intercepted in the mempool and forged before confirmation, become plausible for fast-clock quantum machines. The paper introduces a critical architectural distinction. Superconducting and photonic platforms, with microsecond-scale error correction cycles, can threaten active transactions. Neutral atom and ion trap systems, two to three orders of magnitude slower, can only threaten static holdings with long-exposed keys. Approximately 6.9 million BTC sit in addresses with exposed public keys today. Around 1.7 million of those are locked in early P2PK scripts from the Satoshi era, almost certainly with lost private keys, forming a permanent multibillion-dollar quantum target. Ethereum faces distinct risks: its account model, BLS-based validator signatures, and KZG commitment scheme in data availability sampling each present separate at-rest attack surfaces. The authors validated their resource estimates using a zero-knowledge proof, a first for quantum cryptanalysis, allowing verification without revealing the attack circuit itself. The margin between quantum capability and cryptographic failure is narrowing faster than most migration timelines assume. ---- quantumai. google/static/site-assets/downloads/cryptocurrency-whitepaper.pdf

@aw_trades_ Face rippers today and yesterday: Expect cash open to fade (yesterday to origin point, today almost not quite), then recovery of mean and expansion

So fun to trade NQ right now!! Wicky, no follow through, terrible price action to trade even when setups show Anyone else or just me?

@Tradesdontlie None of this works. TV goes bright eye burning white

Stupid TA - be more random!

@VolSignals @oppugnantone I am infatuated with your service, with volatility, it is extremely interesting, and you are hands down the online expert in this area along with @options_insight . It is without saying an entire frontier of trading mechanics all unto itself. It is also very complicated :/-

@RubiconTrading @oppugnantone I think it’s based on reality

What is a higher time frame gap? Its a footprint of a large set of orders that were in a rush. Verify it with footprint receipts. Verify it with gamma levels. Match charm boundaries with all of the above. People blow off TA as if it is not based on reality. Well, you are looking at the wrong TA, or someone that does not know what they are doing then.

@RubiconTrading @oppugnantone the difference is that all forms of TA are making educated guesses using priors this, is not that- and the difference when properly integrated is career-making

Wrong. They are simplified versions of what is going on. If you actually know TA, which you and your RTM cohort have explicitly admitted you do not, and studied the correlations between footprint/order flow, TPO, DOM resting orders....it is all the same. Happy to share mountains of documentation to this effect. It is no doubt re-assuring to rely on order history, gamma levels, Jack and Jill and Jane and whoever is trading RTM signals to see verified prints...but if you know TA and the clues that approximate these (and in most cases actually represent these, even predict these before they happen), why pay a Tesla Model Y to Porsche Turbo monthly car payment to someone else??