Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€

2.4K posts

Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€ banner
Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€

Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€

@Sebastarian

GMU Econ & PPE. @GOP_RAC Chair. @sfliberty local coordinator. Christian. Anarcho-patriot. Policy wonk. Aspiring Kochospherian & @NancyMacLean5 villain. 21M.

Views my own ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Ocak 2025
1.1K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰673 ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Scott Walker
Scott Walker@ScottWalkerยท
But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. Romans 5:8
Scott Walker tweet media
English
10
6
48
1.7K
Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Republican Anarchist Caucus ๐Ÿด๐Ÿ˜
As a libertarian, you believe currently existing markets are...
English
7
2
17
759
Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Sneedle
Sneedle@SRamirez68083ยท
Why do you think we have Public Choice III but not I and II? The lost volumes were destroyed by the CIA to keep the truth hidden. Look into it people.
End Libertarianism@EndLibertarians

@HayekianBanker @ajxyred Public choice theory is not economics, it is far right propaganda created by James McGill Buchanan, the architect of the radical right.

English
4
6
47
1.5K
property enjoyer HHZZ ๐Ÿš
property enjoyer HHZZ ๐Ÿš@Inkiness110895ยท
the interesting thing about all political positions is that they fall in one of two locations. rape and non rape
property enjoyer HHZZ ๐Ÿš tweet media
English
7
4
43
540
Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€ ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Banquero Hayekiano
Banquero Hayekiano@HayekianBankerยท
enough about the strait of Hormuz, what about the homo of Hormuz????
English
0
1
5
195
Sebastian Song โœ๏ธ๐ŸดโœŒ๏ธ๐ŸŒ๐Ÿ’ฒ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ˜๐Ÿฅ‘๐Ÿ—ฝ๐ŸŒฝ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿฅ€
@AtomsksSanakan @iamonlyadream @NeoRothbardian @c4ssdotorg @mattwridley And once again, you only demand rigorous scientific definitions when people disagree with you, not when they agree with you and use words like "serious" and "threat." That makes you a bad-faith hack applying double standards, which is one of the reasons why I blocked you.
English
0
0
0
19
Atomsk's Sanakan
Atomsk's Sanakan@AtomsksSanakanยท
@Sebastarian @iamonlyadream @NeoRothbardian @c4ssdotorg @mattwridley Smoking causes deadly illnesses like ischemic heart disease, lung cancer, etc. To repeat this for you again: Your *policy* position on smoking is irrelevant to the *science* on its impacts. Your understanding of medical + climate science is very poor. x.com/AtomsksSanakanโ€ฆ
Atomsk's Sanakan tweet media
Atomsk's Sanakan@AtomsksSanakan

@JVinos_Climate That is ludicrous, on par with what the tobacco industry used to evade evidence that smoking caused cancer, heart disease, etc. I'm sorry, Vinรณs, but it's embarrassing for you to have fallen this far in your denialism. A biologist should know better. jech.bmj.com/content/71/11/โ€ฆ

English
2
0
0
37
Atomsk's Sanakan
Atomsk's Sanakan@AtomsksSanakanยท
@Sebastarian @iamonlyadream @NeoRothbardian @c4ssdotorg @mattwridley Nice when denialist ideologues are reduced to responding from behind blocks to save face ๐Ÿ˜„ 1) Already summarized the pertinent section of the video for you. 2) You excluded based on libertarianism. 3) You dodge the implications x.com/Sebastarian/stโ€ฆ x.com/AtomsksSanakanโ€ฆ
Atomsk's Sanakan tweet media
Atomsk's Sanakan@AtomsksSanakan

@Sebastarian @iamonlyadream @NeoRothbardian @c4ssdotorg @mattwridley It's not a self-referential problem, since you're simply pretending not to understand the difference between your political ideology vs. science. You're excluding smoking due to your libertarian*political ideology, not science. You already admitted this: x.com/Sebastarian/stโ€ฆ

English
1
0
0
17