
Shift to Crypto ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ
25.1K posts

Shift to Crypto ๐ด๓ ง๓ ข๓ ฅ๓ ฎ๓ ง๓ ฟ
@ShiftToCrypto
We're living the shift to crypto! Utility altcoins + random retweets. All in on #XRP๐. Holding for institutional DeFi/yield/returns. ๐ซReligion ๐ซDMs ๐ช






Why Elon Musk is RIGHT to fight South Africaโs racist rules blocking Starlink? Imagine this: Long ago, South Africa had very unfair laws called apartheid. They treated Black people badly and kept them from good jobs and money. When those bad laws ended, the country made new rules (called B-BBEE) to help Black people get a fair share of business. The idea was good โ like a big helping hand. But now? For companies like Starlink to sell fast internet, they MUST give away 30% of their business to Black partners. Just because of skin color. Elon Musk was born in South Africa. He left as a teen to chase big dreams. Today, his company SpaceX wants to bring Starlink โ super fast satellite internet โ to South Africa. But the rules say no unless they give up part of the company. Elon said it right: โStarlink is not allowed because Iโm not Black.โ SpaceX promised to spend about $30 million (thatโs 500 million rand!) to give FREE high-speed internet to 5,000 rural schools. That helps over 2.4 MILLION kids every year learn better, get jobs later, and have a brighter future. Real help for the people who need it most! Starlink already works in about 24 other African countries. Villages there now have internet for school, doctors, and business. South Africaโs villages are missing out because of these racist rules. Elon isnโt asking for special favors. He just wants fair play so Starlink can connect everyone fast. Internet = education, jobs, hope. Why hold back millions of kids over rules that pick by race and color?




What stands out to me in this $FLR proposal is pretty simple And for $XRP holders, the connection here is stronger than it may seem. Flare is trying to close the gap between network activity and FLR itself. The network already has real usage. ๐ขAround 153M FXRP has been minted. ๐ขRoughly 86% is deployed in DeFi. ๐ข~$177M locked in DeFi and ~15.7K DeFi users So the issue was never activity. It was whether FLR was capturing enough of the value that activity created. This proposal looks like an attempt to change that. Inflation moves down to 3%. Issuance gets capped at 3B FLR per year. More fees can be burned as usage grows. FIRE is supposed to route more protocol-level value back into the system instead of letting it leak out. That is why FIRE matters here. Its first mandate is reducing FLR supply as far as it can, with network revenue doing the work. That is where it gets interesting. If the design works as intended, the economic loop gets tighter. More activity can mean more fees. More fees and captured value can help offset dilution. Stronger economics can support staking, liquidity, and network participation. In that sense, the proposal is less about โinflation downโ and more about whether Flare can make usage matter more clearly to FLR. The $XRP angle is part of that too. If Rippleโs rails keep expanding and more XRP moves into Flare as FXRP, that could support more DeFi activity on Flare. More activity could then mean more fees, more captured MEV, and more value routed into FIRE. That is why I am getting more bullish on $FLR. Not because the network might grow, but because the token may finally start feeling that growth.



@federalreserve invites public comment on a proposal that would allow U.S. banks and credit unions to use intermediaries to transfer funds through the FedNow Service: federalreserve.gov/newsevents/preโฆ




The DTCC is a major switch.๐๏ธ๐จ

๐จBREAKING: Entire towns and cities are now out on the streets in Ireland opposing their far-left government The fear tactics completely backfired, Ireland has never more united! ๐ฎ๐ช

South Africa has more race laws than at the height of apartheid But it's anti-White, so it's fine








