Björne 🇸🇪🏋️‍♂️

@usapatriot20 @krassenstein Please stop raping kids yankoid. It is an outdated practice. Also, child marriage is bad as well - you could inform your republican leaders of that one.

@usapatriot20 @krassenstein My leader is not in the Epstein files you child-raping freak. My current (conservative) gov actually just passed a big law to catch and sentence more pedophiles, as well as reduce the amount of kids put at harm. Your gov just... admitted that they cut social spending for war..

BREAKING: Trump - "With a little more time, we can easily open the Hormuz Strait, take the oil, and make a fortune. It would be a ‘gusher’ for the world." Newsflash. This is not our oil. It’s the Iranian peoples’ oil. What you were talking about is called theft. I wouldn’t expect anything else from a convicted felon.

@IamR0galD0rn @SandyofCthulhu The narwhal bacons at midnight epic fury my brother!!! 😎😎😎

@IamR0galD0rn @SandyofCthulhu xD!!!!! US conservatives are so with the times and not at all brainbroken retarded redditors

Americans don't hold grudges. The way you've behaved over the last 10-20 years is mostly what we care about. So Britain's leaders are rapidly sawing off the limb they're sitting on that connects to us. Also if you have a history that "looks" cool. To us, Beefeaters don't look cool, but Japanese Imperial regalia looks cool. If France wants us to like them more, for instance, they should show us images and memes of Brigitte Bardot and Catherine Deneuve, instead of Emmanuel Macron denouncing us. Imagine if they used AI images of Yvette Mimieux asking us to be patient with France. We'd be all in.

@usapatriot20 @krassenstein Holy trump dementia-rabble. "As a proud child rapist and religious extremist, bla bla bla"

You don't seem to know a damn thing about what you are talking about. As a straight, white, American, conservative constitutionalist, patriotic Christian, married MAGA supporter, and pro-Trump patriot who puts America First, I see President Trump's tough talk on Iranian oil as common-sense leverage against a terrorist regime that has spilled American blood, funded proxies like Hezbollah and Hamas, chased nuclear weapons, and chanted "Death to America" since 1979. The mullahs' regime is evil—it oppresses its own people, persecutes Christians, and threatens our ally Israel. Trump is right to squeeze them hard after years of weak Biden-era appeasement that let Iran fund terror and enrich uranium. Trump's Recent Statements (as of early April 2026) In the context of ongoing U.S. military operations against Iran (strikes on nuclear sites, infrastructure, and pressure to reopen the Strait of Hormuz amid blocked shipping and rising global oil prices), Trump has said: His "preference" and "favorite thing" would be to take the oil in Iran, including possibly seizing or controlling Kharg Island (Iran's main oil export terminal, handling ~90% of its crude exports). He noted "maybe we take Kharg Island, maybe we don't. We have a lot of options." He has threatened to "obliterate" Iranian electric plants, oil wells, and Kharg Island if no deal is reached quickly. He told allies dependent on Hormuz oil to "go get your own oil," "grab it and cherish it," or "just take it" themselves—while offering U.S. oil instead, since America is energy-dominant and doesn't need it. A White House official echoed that the U.S. aims to get "all of the oil" out of terrorists' hands. This is pressure tactics during conflict—not random theft. Trump frames it as denying revenue to a regime that sponsors terror, while protecting American interests and global energy stability. U.S. Domestic Law and Presidential Authority Constitutional War Powers: Article II makes the President Commander-in-Chief. In armed conflict (especially against a designated state sponsor of terrorism like Iran, with the IRGC as a Foreign Terrorist Organization), the President has broad authority to conduct operations, including targeting enemy infrastructure, resources, and economic assets that fund the war effort. Historical precedent allows seizure or destruction of enemy property during hostilities (e.g., WWII oil targeting). No formal congressional declaration of war is strictly required for limited actions, though the War Powers Resolution (1973) requires notification to Congress within 48 hours of introducing forces into hostilities and aims for withdrawal after 60-90 days without authorization—presidents of both parties have stretched or challenged its limits. Sanctions and Economic Tools: Under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Iran Sanctions Act, and related laws, Trump has restored "maximum pressure" sanctions to drive Iran's oil exports to zero. This includes blocking sales, sanctioning the "shadow fleet" of tankers, and forfeiting illicit cargoes (as done with Venezuelan/Iran-linked tankers via DOJ civil forfeiture when vessels are stateless or violate U.S. law). Proceeds can go to the U.S. Treasury or victims, not the regime. Forfeiture of Illicit Oil: U.S. forces have seized tankers on the high seas carrying Iranian oil tied to the IRGC (using warrants for sanctions violations or terror financing). This is treated as law enforcement against designated terrorists—not "stealing" sovereign oil, but interdicting proceeds of crime. Courts have upheld similar actions. Trump can direct the military to strike oil facilities or interdict shipments as part of degrading Iran's war-making capacity. Permanent annexation or commercial exploitation of Iranian oil fields by the U.S. government would push legal boundaries without clearer congressional backing or post-conflict occupation authority. International Law Realities International law (UN Charter, customary rules) generally prohibits seizing another sovereign state's natural resources in peacetime as aggression or violation of territorial sovereignty. In active armed conflict, laws of war (Hague/Geneva conventions) allow targeting military/economic assets supporting the enemy, destruction of infrastructure, and temporary control of territory—but not permanent plunder for profit. "Taking the oil" for U.S. commercial sale would face accusations of violating resource sovereignty, though critics (often from adversarial nations like China) routinely ignore Iran's own aggression, nuclear cheating, and terror exports. In practice, during hot conflict, the stronger power's actions on the ground often prevail over paper rules. Allies like Israel have long understood that weakness invites more attacks from Iran. Trump prioritizes American strength over globalist hand-wringing. Bottom Line from an America First View Trump isn't "stealing" like some leftist or globalist would caricature—he's using every tool (sanctions, strikes, leverage, and yes, potential seizure of enemy assets) to crush a regime that has murdered Americans for decades, from the 1983 Beirut barracks (241 Marines) to EFPs in Iraq to October 7 enablers. Denying oil revenue starves their terror machine, nuclear program, and oppression at home. If seizing Kharg or interdicting oil weakens them faster and forces a real deal (or regime change), that's smart warfare, not charity. Congress could pass explicit authorization if needed for larger-scale occupation, but as constitutionalists, we recognize the executive's lead in national security against clear threats. Weakness (Obama/Biden deals that funded Iran) got us here. Strength ends it. America produces plenty of its own oil—Trump made us energy independent before. We don't "need" Iran's, but crushing their ability to fund jihad protects our troops, Israel, and civilized nations. The Iranian regime deserves no mercy until it stops threatening us and our allies. Trump is delivering the pressure they fear. God bless President Trump, our military, and the United States of America. Peace through strength isn't a slogan—it's survival.

@SaltyGoat17 Better to pay Iran then? Retarded US idea

“Instead of Iran charging $2M/vessel going through the Strait, the U.S. will charge a $2M escort fee for every vessel, which is about $9B a month or $100B in revenue.” “We will waive that fee for any country that participates in the coalition to open up the Strait.” BRILLIANT!!

@martinofficiell Ska folk swisha dig för att du är en röv??

Hindrad att sova natten mot långfredag. Stötta kanalen Swish 0735309507

@BasedHypnotist "You think that you chose to leave the room. No, I shat my pants - and as such created a context where you naturally left the room. I HAVE CONTROL"

@scorehopeful @RasmusJarlov Swedish soldiers were deployed to stave off an American invasion. You can shut your fat illiterate mouth piggy

@RasmusJarlov Good intentions?! You betray the US in the same breath the US asks for support. Every nation in Europe is hedging against the US after all they have done.

As a European, I am not afraid that the USA will leave NATO. We already know that they do not have good intentions to Europe and that we, therefore, have to build our defence to be able to fight without the Americans. We are well on our way and it will happen a lot faster if the USA leaves NATO officially. Russia is too weak and small to be a long term threat to Europe. They simple can not match what we can produce. As long as we keep Ukraine from falling, Russia is also not a threat to us in the short term. So if the USA leaves NATO, it is simple for us: Keep Ukraine from falling at all costs and build up European defence and weapon production as fast as humanly possible. We can and we will do that and Europe will be absolutely fine and safe.

“Bridges can be rebuilt, but the opportunity to discipline America will not be repeated”

@AwobusuyiA @axios Who the fuck would trust the US government??? 🤣🤣🤣 Bro I got a magic bridge to sell you

BREAKING: U.S. fighter jet shot down in Iran, search underway for crew axios.com/2026/04/03/ira…

@paul_zoell68952 @MorePerfectUS Your kids won't be able to speak any language at this rate lol

@MorePerfectUS Sounds good to me! I'm all for cutting the waste filled social programs and strengthening our military. It's a better option than speaking Chinese or Arabic.

Trump has proposed a $1.5 trillion defense budget — a 40% increase, the largest since WWII. In exchange for more war he wants to: -Cut the EPA budget by half -Cut $10.7 billion for housing -Cut $8.5 billion for K-12 programs -Cancel $15 billion for clean energy -Cut $2.5 billion for clean drinking water -Eliminate $1.6 billion for youth job training -Cut $3.5 billion from the Labor Department -Eliminate $395 million for senior employment -Eliminate $775 million in food assistance grants -Eliminate the National Endowment for Democracy -Cut $5 billion from the National Institutes of Health -Eliminate the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) In all, cuts to domestic programs would account for a 10% reduction in discretionary spending.

It’s legit a banger

@HOGDImperator @DanCollins2011 Go ask the scam administration currently robbing your country blind by abusing their positions of government (Scamcoins, private fundraising, favorable private contracts, insider trading at levels never seen before)!

This feels like the first war in my lifetime where literally the whole world wants the U.S to lose. Do we have any friends left?

when a circumcised male says something so mutilated you foreskinuinely gotta hit them with the intact stare

@HOGDImperator @DanCollins2011 I forgot, Hungary! The dictator of Europe! God its such an embarassment, really the only thing that can put you back on track is your own Nuremburg trials.

@HOGDImperator @DanCollins2011 Who are your friends? The butcherets of the gulf states? The warmongerers of israel? The just state of El Salvador? Such a great collection of just states!

@bruceymonkey @RasmusJarlov @FreedomHasWon Oh, are they NATO tanks? Can we borrow them for some Swedish needs?

@RasmusJarlov @FreedomHasWon 60% of total and 15-16 of direct. So yeah, we pay 15-16% of the cost of secretary Jane and the HQ. But we pay 60%+ of the cost of the tanks.

Rubio is on fire! Why do we pay 62% of NATO’s budget but can’t use what we pay for? NATO is now a spineless organization.

@labadfwu @FearedBuck Grown man talking about snitching 😭😭 you a lil boy for real

@FearedBuck Atlanta niggas love snitching, ain’t no way Gucci ran to the Feds

Pooh Shiesty allegedly set up a meeting with Gucci Mane on January 10 to talk about a contract. When he showed up with his crew, he pulled an AK-47 and forced him to sign a release. His crew, also armed, then robbed others of Rolex watches, jewelry, cash, and other items, and later showed them off on social media. Authorities describe Pooh Shiesty as the conspirator, He was on home confinement at the time after serving three years for a previous case and being released in October 2025, with rules saying he couldn’t commit another federal crime or have a gun.