Jammin309

A man who can control his lust is unstoppable.

“High Net-worth broke” is another type of suffering no one explains. You might find a billionaire indoors in his mega-mansion unable to buy fuel in his 5 car convoy to attend an event. He locks his gate and avoids visitors hoping he can solve their problems. I once helped a G-wagon bros with N50k to fuel his car as he was running late for a flight and only had 3 miles with 0 Naira in all his accounts. I was fueling my classic mercedes at the forte oil on admiralty road in lekkk and he casually walked up to me and told me his ordeal. I didn’t even think twice or judge him, I just asked them to fuel him quickly. Apparently his driver took the car on an errand and left it on empty. He got to Abuja and transferred N250k to me about a month later. I totally forgot the encounter. Great guy and today he is one of my biggest customers at my eyewear stores. I too had been in his shoes, so I understand how it happens. That Rich man you look up too, might need your little help once in a while. 🙏🏾

@Nagatoma24908 @valentine_25294 @legal_padi Yes...

@StJammin @valentine_25294 @legal_padi Security work ?

Money is a very very fickle thing. I know someone who had 100m in the Bank close to 10 years ago and today lives with his father in a one bedroom flat in the village. When 2M could get you a good car, this guy would spend it in a day in the club.

@Kesscrypt @valentine_25294 @legal_padi 😂😂😂😂 Go to Bariga, shomolu, and ikorodu. You'll see many of them

@StJammin @valentine_25294 @legal_padi Some pple need to be stoned to death. That person is cursed.

@Afr_JP @bedroomking2 One simple question: Why don’t men who cheat on their wives or women who sleep with married men ever face any karma?

What you do to another man’s wife and children will be done to yours. Sleep with married women today tomorrow your own wife and kids will be used the same way: pictures posted, names exposed, threads made. Karma doesn’t negotiate. Run from married women. Protect your own house. 🔥

After dating more than 10 women and f*cking more than 25 of them, here are 10 truths about women I learned. 1. It is easy to fvck married women and those in relationship than single ones.

@valentine_25294 @legal_padi How is this a fake story? I know somebody in Bariga that cashed out almost 100 million , 2011. He lodged at Eko Hotel for six months or even more I can't remember, After the money finish, he came back to Bariga. The guy is doing security work at gbagada currently.

@legal_padi Always this fake stories , figment of yall imagination. lol 😂 , just dey lie and lie

@legal_padi Haaa

There’s a bank in Bariga, they bought the land from a family. Someone who was the first son got 30m from the sale. Do you know the first thing he did when he was credited ? He loaded his bet account. Not kidding !! Blew everything on betting. Now, he lives with his baby mama in a face me in face you in Ikorodu.

@legal_padi 💪💪💪🫡

My man @StJammin

Quick workout & selfie before the work begins. Back to back calls with founders today!!!

How Far Can The SEC Go To Protect Investors? Securities and Exchange Commission v. Big Treat Plc & Ors (2019) LPELR-46520 (CA) Question Can the Securities and Exchange Commission take over a failing public company, even if that company is not a stockbroker or fund manager? Short Answer Yes. Any company registered with SEC and operating in the capital market can be taken over by the regulator if it is failing. The commission has the power to do whatever is necessary to protect investors. Legal Background The Securities and Exchange Commission is the apex regulator of the Nigerian capital market. Under section 13(v) of the Investment and Securities Act, 2007, the commission can intervene in the management and control of capital market operators that have failed, are failing, or are in crisis. It can enter their premises and do whatever it considers necessary to protect investors. Facts in Brief Big Treat Plc was a public company listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. In 2008, SEC discovered the company was sliding into serious financial trouble. To protect investors, it applied to court for an order to appoint an interim management team to take over the company and preserve its assets. The directors opposed the application, arguing that Big Treat was not a capital market operator and SEC had no power to intervene. The trial judge agreed. SEC appealed. Competing Arguments Appellant (SEC): Big Treat was registered with the commission and issued shares to the public. That made it a capital market operator, and the Investment and Securities Act, 2007 gave SEC the power to intervene. Respondents (Big Treat Plc & Directors): Big Treat was just a regular public company, not a stockbroker or fund manager. SEC had no business trying to take control of it. Core Holding The Court of Appeal overturned the trial court and ruled in favour of SEC. Under section 315 of the Investment and Securities Act, 2007, a capital market operator is anyone registered with SEC to perform specific functions in the capital market. Big Treat was registered, issued shares, and traded on the stock exchange. That made it a capital market operator. Under section 13(v) of the Act, SEC could intervene to protect investors. What To Learn From This If your company is publicly listed and registered with SEC, you are a capital market operator. SEC has oversight powers over you. If your company starts to fail, SEC can appoint interim managers and take control. Section 61 of the Investment and Securities Act, 2007 requires capital market operators to establish internal controls over financial reporting. If you ignore that duty and your company collapses, the regulator will step in. The Investment and Securities Act, 2025 has retained this power. Section 4 of the 2025 Act explicitly allows SEC to intervene in public companies to protect investors. Basically, operating in the capital market comes with responsibility. If you cannot manage your affairs properly, the regulator will step in and do it for you.

@legal_padi 😂🤣🤣

Randomly remembering how my first criminal matter as a young lawyer was a Murder case. I was so afraid to meet him when I was briefed but we became good friends after we got him off. That’s a lawyers life for you 😂😂😂😂😂

If you spend money on your boyfriend, your finances will improve. Men are spiritual beings. The spiritual controls the physical.

Corporate liability: Can My Company Be Held Liable for a Civil Wrong Done By My Employee? One thing I’ve noticed over the years is how easily people get confused when something goes wrong and a company’s employee is involved. The first instinct is usually “Let me sue the employee.” And I often say, you may need to sue the company instead. So, can a company be held accountable for what its employee does? Yes, it can. If an employee of ABC Ltd injures you or damages your property while carrying out their duties (for example, making a delivery), you can hold the company responsible. In law, this is referred to as vicarious liability. Put simply, it means the company answers for the actions of its employee. You can sue the employee. You can sue the company. Or you can sue both. What do you need to show? To hold the company liable, two things need be established: 1.There must be an employer-employee relationship You need to show that the person is truly working for the company, not just loosely associated with them. What if the person is not an employee but an independent contractor? You’re not necessarily without options. Generally, companies are not liable for independent contractors. But there are exceptions. A company may still be liable if: • They authorised or directed the act • The work is inherently risky • The company was negligent in hiring or supervising the contractor 2.The act must occur in the course of employment The wrongful act must be linked to the employee’s duties. For instance, if a delivery rider hits you while delivering a parcel, that would fall within the scope of their work. But if the same rider abandons their duties to attend to a personal matter, that is what the law describes as a “frolic of his own,” and the company may not be liable. Why does the law take this approach? Two main reasons: • Capacity to pay: Companies are often better placed to compensate victims than individual employees • Control and responsibility: If a company benefits from the work done, it should also bear the associated risks Can the company recover its loss from the employee? Yes, although it is not always straightforward. A company may recover losses through: • Internal disciplinary processes • Contractual provisions (such as indemnity clauses) • Legal action, particularly in more serious situations What should you take away from this? • If an employee causes harm and cannot compensate you, the company may be held responsible • But only where the act was carried out in the course of employment • And for companies, not every act of an employee automatically creates liability. The specific circumstances must always be considered Corporate liability does not cover everything an employee does. What matters is whether there is a real employment relationship and whether the act was tied to the job. If both are in place, the company can be held responsible. If not, the claim may stop with the individual. So before deciding who to go after, look closely at the facts. That’s where the answer usually is.

@kofoworola__a Ewu

If we don’t beat Everton today call me a goat 👍🏽

God will take you before Ramadan

@iam_jayCheqs @RaenestApp Raenest, please help a hard-working girl

RaenestTag: Jaycheqs Hi @RaenestApp happy 4th anniversary 🥳 I’m Jennifer, a cold caller working CST hours from Yaba& Nepa has been showing me shege. My wish is a SANCI 300W Portable Power Station 🙏🏽 This would help me earn better& stress less❤️ #RaenestAt4 #RaenestMakeAWish

This

@oluwaDanielmii Help me say hi to Jesus

If Chelsea no flog PSG 4-0, make I no see tomorrow 🙏

@rukky_nate It's happens to me during deadlifts and squatting. If I'm going heavy, like from 4 plates to 5 plates.

at the gym this evening this big guy was just loading plates on the bar for like 60 seconds straight. 120kg in total. all the gym bros were already impressed. he finally got under the bar. he lifted, weight didn’t move. he paused. lifted again, weight didn’t move. the he quietly removed two plates from each side 😭 turned around and said, “today is not the day to impress anybody. today is the day to go home without injury to my family” whole gym were on the floor laughing. but lowkey… everyone respected him more. Sometimes the real gym workout is knowing when to reduce the weight. Have you ever gone to the gym feeling strong… then reality humbled you?

Supreme Court Case Review Taking Money Under a Contract Then Calling The Contract Illegal Major Concept Ltd & Anor v. Prince (Engr.) Arthur Eze (2025) 19 NWLR (Pt. 2019) 1 Question Can you collect money under a contract, fail to perform, and then escape liability by claiming the contract was illegal all along? Short answer No. You cannot take the benefit of a contract and later turn around to say it was illegal. The law will not allow you to use illegality as a shield after you have already put the money in your pocket. Legal Background Nigerian courts have long held that a party who participates in a contract, enjoys its benefits, and then fails to perform cannot suddenly invoke illegality to avoid repaying what was received. This principle is rooted in fairness and good conscience. The law does not reward opportunism. Where a contract is truly illegal from the start, neither party can enforce it. But where one party has collected money, failed to deliver, and only raises illegality when sued, the court will treat that argument as unconscionable and refuse to entertain it. Facts in Brief Major Concept Ltd agreed to supply Prince Arthur Eze with a Maybach armoured vehicle for USD 830,000. Prince Arthur Eze paid USD 700,000 upfront. The vehicle was never delivered. The company later demanded an additional USD 300,000 before delivery. The Respondent, relying on the personal assurances of the company's director, Mr. Okwuosa, paid the money. Total paid: USD 1 million. The vehicle still never came. Prince Arthur Eze sued for a refund. In response, the appellants raised a new argument. They claimed the contract was illegal because it violated the CBN Act, 2007 and the Foreign Exchange (Monitoring and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 2004. According to them, since the contract was illegal, the court could not enforce it and the Respondent could not recover his money. Competing Arguments Appellants (Major Concept Ltd & Director): The contract was illegal under Nigerian foreign exchange laws. An illegal contract is void and unenforceable. The Respondent cannot recover money paid under an illegal agreement. Respondent (Prince Arthur Eze): The appellants collected one million US dollars, failed to deliver the vehicle, and are now hiding behind illegality. They cannot take the benefit of the contract and then claim it was unlawful only when it is time to account for the money. Core Holding The Supreme Court held that it is unconscionable for a party to claim illegality of a contract after taking benefit from it. The appellants collected USD 1 million from the Respondent for the supply of a vehicle. They failed to supply the vehicle. Their inability to perform was the cause of action. They could not now turn around and say the contract was illegal simply to avoid repaying the money. The court made clear that the law does not permit a party to approbate and reprobate. You cannot blow hot and cold. You cannot accept money under a contract, spend it, fail to deliver, and then invoke illegality when judgment is about to be entered against you. What To Learn From This You cannot collect money under a contract, fail to perform, and then claim the contract was illegal to escape liability. Illegality must be raised in good faith, not as a tactical escape route after you have already enjoyed the benefit. The law does not permit you to blow hot and cold. In simple terms, you cannot eat your cake, refuse to bake someone else's, and then claim there was never supposed to be any cake in the first place.

Some people pretend to help you, but they do it in such a way that you can’t truly benefit from their help. In the end, you gain nothing meaningful except the feeling that you should be grateful to them.