Talya

Un poeta cuenta la historia de Óscar Restrepo, otrora joven promesa de la poesía colombiana —¡un premio y dos libros publicados!— devenida en alcoholicazo perdedor a los 54 años de edad. Victimista, desempleado, resentido, Óscar vive con su madre anciana, cuyo precario amparo le permite habitar la rutina de beber en la calle y discutir literatura con teporochos que confunden a García Márquez con Paulo Coelho. The real Bukowski, pues. Su vida cambia cuando acepta dar clases en una preparatoria. Allí conoce a Yurlady, una adolescente humilde que escribe poemas sencillos y potentes en su cuaderno. Impresionado por su autenticidad, Óscar la toma como alumna y protegida, viendo en ella una oportunidad de redención: ayudar a que triunfe donde él fracasó, ganar algo de dinero para pagar la universidad de su hija adolescente y, sobre todo, reencontrarse con la persona que alguna vez fue. Repleta de retratos ácidos y situaciones hilarantes (Yurlady rodando cuesta abajo, la patética burocracia cultural, la familia gandalla, la estudiante performática que se tira al piso), la película dirigida por Simón Mesa Soto evita los lugares comunes y las resoluciones edificantes estilo Good Will Hunting. También se niega a enfatizar el humor de manera estética: sin música, encuadres ni edición que le señalen al espectador que es momento de reír. Inteligente decisión. Por fortuna, siempre hay grietas por donde se filtra la luz. Todos merecemos un poema feliz. Ubeimar Ríos, impresionante. Filmada en 16 milímetros, textura granulosa y bordes sucios incluidos. Disponible en HBO Max.

I just finished reading palantir’s manifesto & I need you to understand what you’re actually looking at because this is the MOST important document the tech world has produced this year most people came away thinking «wow what a thoughtful essay about patriotism and technology »…I came away thinking this is the most elegant justification for corporate capture of the state apparatus ever written & I want to walk you through why krp opens with «silicon valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible » & frames the entire document as a call to civic duty, but read between the lines and what he’s actually saying is that the engineering elite should be embedded inside the defense and intelligence apparatus of the nation, he’s describing exactly what palantir has already done and dressing it up as patriotism «the question is not whether AI weapons will be built, it is who will build them and for what purpose »sounds like a warning but it’s actually a sales pitch, he’s telling every gov on earth that the choice is binary either you buy from us or your adversaries will build it without you, this is the oldest arms dealer rhetoric in history wrapped in SV vocabulary « hard power in this century will be built on software »is the key sentence of the entire manifesto because this is where karp reveals the real thesis, he’s saying whoever controls the software layer of national defense controls the nation itself & if you’ve been following my threads you know that palantir’s gotham and foundry platforms are already plugged into the intelligence feeds the satellite data, financial transactions & communications of dozens of govts worldwide through a single ontological knowledge graph that creates a technological dependency so deep that migrating away would mean rebuilding the entire institutional memory of the organization from scratch this is vendor lockin at the scale of nation states and I’m personally convinced it was designed this way from the beginning «we should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act » is karp defending palantir’s expansion into every domain the gov used to handle itself, policing immigration, military targeting intelligence analysis public health, everywhere the state retreats palantir advances and what was once a government function becomes a private service that the government can no longer perform without plantir’s permission and here’s what I think makes it even more concerning, these systems are increasingly autonomous meaning the AI layer is making targeting recommendations threat assessments & resource allocation decisions that humans inside gov are rubber stamping without fully understanding the underlying logic a bureaucrat inside the pentagon / DGSI sees a recommendation from the system & approves it because the system has been right 97% of the time and questioning it would require technical expertise that no one in the room has, this is algorithmic governance wearing the mask of human decision making «the atomic age is ending, a new era of deterrence built on ai is set to begin »is the MOST chilling sentence in the document because karp is explicitly saying that ai based deterrence will replace nuclear deterrence as the organizing principle of global power, and whoever builds that ai deterrence layer owns the 21st century the same way whoever built the bomb owned the 20th & he’s telling you plainly that palantir intends to be that builder «national service should be a universal duty » & « we should only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk »sounds noble until you realize that he is proposing a system where citizens serve the state & the state is operationally dependent on palantir, the public bears the risk and palantir captures the value, soldiers fight wars planned by algorithms they can’t audit built by a company they can’t vote out