DenisTheReal

2K posts

DenisTheReal banner
DenisTheReal

DenisTheReal

@The33374Real

Reallty enjoyer, Not afraid to follow the white rabbit...

가입일 Eylül 2025
25 팔로잉13 팔로워
DenisTheReal 리트윗함
Paula Wright 🦚
Paula Wright 🦚@PaulaWright·
Because feminism is THE arena for female intrasexual competition. Feminists want power to control and suppress the fertility of other women. Rowling doesn't see this. She believes feminism is a proximate expression of liberal values when actually it's an ultimate expression of female tyranny over others. This is expressed in feminisms primary goal to "dismantle patriarchy" rather than help women. Rowling has a blind spot here. The left hand doesn't know what the right is doing.
Christian Heiens 🏛@ChristianHeiens

Rowling’s tweet was great, and I’ll give her props for writing it. But she still does not yet understand that Transgenderism is not a betrayal of her own Feminist principles, it’s the fulfillment of them. The entire premise behind Feminism is that women are oppressed by a system of unchosen obligations imposed upon them by a patriarchal society, and that they must be liberated from this tyranny of traditional sex roles. But Transgenderism simply looks at Feminism and says “You rightfully criticize the unchosen obligations of traditional sex roles, yet you are unwilling to acknowledge the unchosen obligations of assigned sex at birth.” The fact is that any movement which once fought against traditional roles for men and women on the grounds that they’re oppressive, unchosen obligations imposed upon people by society, must necessarily give way to a new movement which now fights against the idea that there can even be any distinctions between men and women at all. Rowling is fighting a battle that she lost from the start.

English
19
48
369
15.1K
DenisTheReal 리트윗함
Peter Wright
Peter Wright@Gynocentrism·
WTF am I reading here: "a man has to accept his cuckold role in open Hypergamy." A number of men are experiencing exactly that - and not because our species is wired for female-only hypergamy (that's a myth), but because they get what they believe. Men have always been hypergamous for money, material resources, status and secondarily for healthy female genes up until 200 years ago when the rise of the romantic model culturally forced a taboo against male hypergamy, and exaggerated female hypergamy. The men who are suffering this cuckoldry believe that these recycled memetics and hard-wired, and inevitable, exactly as you are telling them. Evopsych fixates on contemporary cross-cultural samples, so does your fixation on praxeology, both of which fall into the fallacy of presentism: assuming today's culture is "human nature" that was consistent throughout evolutionary history. You need to deal with this challenge if you want to retain cred. Championing cuckoldry is to make yourself a tool of a meme - in its service. You have a history of reading and studying, unlike so many men in the space, so I know you are capable of doing the math. It might be worth getting something going with Shah, or going solo, to flesh out a deeper level of insight beyond 200 yr old memetics, fwiw.
English
6
4
21
1.1K
DenisTheReal
DenisTheReal@The33374Real·
@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 Not every generation does this. Only the weak ones blame others for their current situation, and ironically, these same people refuse to take responsibility for their own actions 😉
English
0
0
0
18
JACBailey
JACBailey@JACBailey1·
1. Why do women think they get to define masculinity? Especially when they scream and cry misogyny if a man dared suggest he knows what femininity should be 2. So masculinity is being a womans servant basically?
🌼🌿 Sommerkadse 🌻🐝@susp_cat

English
18
31
505
11.6K
DenisTheReal
DenisTheReal@The33374Real·
@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 History doesn't just define masculinity; it sets the rules. And one of those rules says: 'Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And weak men create hard times.' We are currently living in the hard times created by weak men.
English
1
0
0
33
@ItsComplicatedChannel
@ItsComplicatedChannel@ItsCompChannel·
@The33374Real @JACBailey1 If history defines masculinity, then were the men who gave women the vote and other rights not “real men”? If they were, then history doesn’t support your point.
English
1
0
0
34
DenisTheReal
DenisTheReal@The33374Real·
@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 Those 'real men' sacrificed their lives in WW1 and WW2, and feminism only emerged in their absence. Comparing 60 years of modern trends to 5,000 years of history isn't a fair equivalence. There is no feminism in History.
English
1
0
0
39
@ItsComplicatedChannel
@ItsComplicatedChannel@ItsCompChannel·
@JACBailey1 What’s the difference between women defining what a “real man” is and the masculinity movement defining what a “real man” is? What gives either one the right to define manhood? 🤔
@ItsComplicatedChannel tweet media
English
6
3
15
619
DenisTheReal 리트윗함
Kintak
Kintak@Kintakus·
This is one reason human biodiversity is such a big deal. It would behoove people of European and Asian descent to understand that equatorial peoples did NOT (with exceptions) evolve forward-thinking. Homo sapiens originated as a tropical species. That's where our food is plentiful and life is easy (if you're not facing disease, predators, or war at the time). Living outside the tropics is HARD for us. We risk freezing or starving to death EVERY YEAR. For those lineages that migrated north, our brains adapted before our bodies did. We evolved to plan for the future. The ones that DID NOT leave DID NOT! There was no evolutionary impetus! They did not need to plan for winter. They did not need to develop agriculture or animal husbandry (again, exceptions such as desert-dwellers) and plan around their cyclic nature. They only needed to work when hungry, only enough to sate their hunger, and migrate when food in the area became scarce. That brings us to the modern day, where over and over we're shocked when the descendents of the same people fail to anticipate or understand the consequences of their actions. Of course they do! The past and future barely register for them! They live in an eternal 'today'. The smartest ones can consciously overcome this, but the vast majority do not even think about what comes 'tomorrow', much less a year or more in the future. This is why 'Haitians' slaughtered the French and now live in squalor eating mud cookies. This is why 'Bantu' are running South Africa back into the dirt while looting the only remaining productive people in their country. This is why 'starving Africans' remain starving no matter how much help we give them. This is why 'refugees' create the exact same circumstances that led them to leave their home country. You cannot trust YOUR future to people who don't even plan for THEIR OWN future!
Kintak tweet media
Matt Forney@mattforney

Brownoids know this and they don't care. Does a locust care that eating all the crops will starve them in the long run? No. Brownoids have made it clear that they would rather rule the ashes then live in paradise. Over a decade ago, I read Ian Smith's THE GREAT BETRAYAL, his account of his career as Rhodesian prime minister, the declaration of independence from the U.K., the Bush War, and the eventual takeover of the country by Robert Mugabe. When the British South Africa Company established Rhodesia in 1885, the black population was roughly 700,000. At the time of Rhodesia's independence in 1965, the black population was 4 million. The blacks had been sitting on some of the most fertile, productive farmland in Africa for centuries and did absolutely nothing with it. Less than a century of white rule and the black population increased by a factor of six, meaning that the people whining about "colonialism" and doing terrorist attacks in the bush were only alive because of whites' ingenuity and generosity. Brownoids and blackoids will never have a come to Jesus moment where they realize they fucked up in trying to exterminate whitey. Some will (Zimbabwe being an ironic example; they welcomed some white farmers returning a few years ago). But most will not. They will either shrug their shoulders and accept that their collapsing living standards "are just the way things are" or they will blame residual white "racism" and "colonialism" for their poverty. The blame game will become progressively absurd as whites shrink in both absolute numbers and political power. Look at South Africa. The ANC has been in charge for 30 years and things have never been worse, yet the government is still blaming whitey, still trying to steal his shit. Orania, that Afrikaaner enclave that people keep touting to me as a successful example of white separatism, will eventually be razed and destroyed by the South African military or state-backed "militants." The only reason they haven't done it already is because the ANC is looting easier targets and because the Trump administration cut off foreign aid and is pushing sanctions. Should the Democrats win back the White House, they will say nothing as the South African government wipes Orania off the map. The groundwork for the South Africanization of America was laid long before politics became overtly about killing white people. You know how libtards go on about how red states are "leeches" because they consume more federal dollars than they contribute? That originated with the "Fuck the South" blog in 2004, which was set up by some angry libtard the day after Bush won reelection. The actual reasons for this supposed imbalance in federal contributions are a) the large population of nons in the South (Alabama has a larger per capita black population than any blue state) and b) blue staters retiring to cheaper red states, taking their Social Security and Medicare payments with them. The lie that red states are takers and blue staters are makers is being used to justify a libtard redistribution program that will starve out the former. Socialism for the blue states, fascism for the red states. Extraction from white people in every manner possible, as we saw during the Biden dictatorship. Wyoming bled to prop up California. And as white people shrink, brownoids will just resort to ever more absurd djinnbrained beliefs, which we got a preview of when Confederate generals were dug up in the wake of George Floyd to get their bad juju away from the blaqpipo. The world ends with a brownoid exhuming the skeleton of the last white man and smashing his skull with a rock, screaming "lEaVe mE aLoNe!" as he pounds the bone into dust.

English
61
570
5.3K
153.9K
DenisTheReal 리트윗함
Richard Cooper
Richard Cooper@Rich_Cooper·
Women wait at the finish line and fuck the winner
Richard Cooper tweet media
English
94
233
2.7K
126.2K
FHousebunny
FHousebunny@mensrightsbunny·
They just don't make them like they used to.
FHousebunny tweet media
English
30
4
92
2.1K
DenisTheReal
DenisTheReal@The33374Real·
@orm0nde I don’t think their goal is to collapse the nation but rather replace it.
English
0
0
1
505
Orm
Orm@orm0nde·
The fact Britain has been able to absorb 10s of millions of retarded 3rd worlders without completely collapsing is a testament to the incredible nation our ancestors built. I hope we deport them all before it’s totally destroyed
English
83
671
13K
142.4K
DenisTheReal 리트윗함
Wolfsoldier
Wolfsoldier@Wolfsoldie4315·
Wolfsoldier tweet media
ZXX
83
1.9K
10.4K
121.5K
Z
Z@insatiablevine·
Why the fuck am I seeing every large account simping for the woke garbage film Odyssey? Does no one have integrity in this filthy world? Disappointing.
English
376
205
3.7K
47.9K