Sabitlenmiş Tweet
@ItsComplicatedChannel
1.4K posts

@ItsComplicatedChannel
@ItsCompChannel
403K subscribers on YouTube. Rules of Modern Dating & Understanding Women.
Las Vegas, NV Katılım Ocak 2023
2.2K Takip Edilen2.2K Takipçiler

@mrGlennLawrence How much status chasing is required to “become liberated?”
English

@ItsCompChannel Are you suggesting that male improvement is not what’s needed for men’s liberation?
English

Why has male advocacy become more about self-improvement than men’s liberation? 🤔 #success #status #masculinity
English

@Strawhatmonger Capitalism runs off the Simp economy 🤷🏻♂️
English

@ItsCompChannel Men's liberation will have a heavy effect on the GDP and the government will not allow that nor corporations.
English

@The33374Real @JACBailey1 Every generation blames the previous one for decline. That doesn’t prove your definition of masculinity is correct.
English

@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 History doesn't just define masculinity; it sets the rules. And one of those rules says: 'Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And weak men create hard times.'
We are currently living in the hard times created by weak men.
English

1. Why do women think they get to define masculinity? Especially when they scream and cry misogyny if a man dared suggest he knows what femininity should be
2. So masculinity is being a womans servant basically?
🌼🌿 Sommerkadse 🌻🐝@susp_cat
English

@The33374Real @JACBailey1 If history defines masculinity, then were the men who gave women the vote and other rights not “real men”? If they were, then history doesn’t support your point.
English

@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 Those 'real men' sacrificed their lives in WW1 and WW2, and feminism only emerged in their absence. Comparing 60 years of modern trends to 5,000 years of history isn't a fair equivalence.
There is no feminism in History.
English

@The33374Real @JACBailey1 But weren’t those strong masculine “real men” of the past the same ones who catered to feminism and allowed it to get worse? 🤷🏻♂️
English

@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 We already have a definition of what a 'real man' is; it’s called History.
English

@TheTrueBudman You’re making my point.
If conservatives believe women aren’t moral adults, then they’re defending the same double standard I criticized. Feminists excuse women because they’re “oppressed.” Traditionalists excuse women because they’re “not full adults.”
Why is that justice?
English

@ItsCompChannel Because men are adults. Women are not.
No society at any time has ever held women as full adults with responsibility and accountability.
Our insanity of giving women adult rights w/o adult responsibility/accountability will cost us our civilization.
English


@CaudilloNuclear “Adapt” is just a more flattering word for “cope.” If the answer is always “accept the market and change yourself,” then you’re not solving the problem, you’re teaching men how to function within it.
English

@NunyaDanBiznez @RationalMale If a man’s wife rejects him, your answer is for HIM to get fitter, richer, more attractive, more social, and compete harder for her approval. At what point do you ask whether the relationship itself is the problem instead of telling him to become a better product? 🤦🏻♂️
English

@ItsCompChannel @RationalMale If this is a serious question, increase your value.
Get fit, increase your social circle, increase your income, "looksmax", do handyman chores, etc. The fastest, most sure-fired way to get your wife to want you is to get other women to want you.
English

@sundogtkm @JACBailey1 And what will that version of manhood look like if their teachers are male simps? 🤷🏻♂️

English

@ItsCompChannel @JACBailey1 Men shape manhood in boys. Women cannot do this.
English

@Gynocentrism @Rich_Cooper So if men are supposed to be willing to give their lives to protect women, how is every relationship not an unequal exchange of value? 🤔
English

@Rich_Cooper definition of simping here also works.
"it's an unequal exchange of value; man gives something to woman and gets something of far less value in return, that's what simping is."
Peter Wright@Gynocentrism
Mic drop. @RealPaulElam says "Simping is the opposite of hypergamy." youtube.com/live/baVzjYFhR…
English


@acidbrat13 @D4rkestM4rk @The_RomaArmy Sorry but your “anecdotal experience” doesn’t disprove the cultural expectations of most women that men should do the approaching, protecting, providing, etc. And we have the footage to prove it.
youtu.be/71o3hq6iSPM?is…

YouTube
English

@D4rkestM4rk @ItsCompChannel @The_RomaArmy That’s not a gender role. Both partners in a relationship should have no issue paying for each other. I have no problem paying when I go on dates. It’s not a “man” only thing.
English

@JoshSoveren Reproduction has always been a cooperative process. Men can’t reproduce without women, women can’t reproduce without men. Beyond that, for most of history, women also depended on men for protection, provisioning, and raising children. Why focus on only one side of the dependency?
English

Obviously. It all stems from men not being able to have children without needing a woman in some capacity.
@ItsComplicatedChannel@ItsCompChannel
@KarolineGosling How do you give men more power when masculinity itself is largely defined by self-sacrifice? If men are socially conditioned to give their time, labor, resources, protection, and even their lives for women, wouldn’t they just hand that power back?
English

@acidbrat13 @The_RomaArmy But aren’t men required to fulfill their gender roles to be with women in the first place?
English

@The_RomaArmy There’s no gender requirements for either role. Live how you want to live. Your life, your choice.
English



