James

706 posts

James banner
James

James

@ThreeDog4746

Just a dude that loves and follows Christ and loves all that He has created.

가입일 Aralık 2020
113 팔로잉17 팔로워
고정된 트윗
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
Jesus loves you.
English
0
0
0
96
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@Chadster_man @SirSicCrusader So your argument is "you compiled a book of historical documents and because they agree with your worldview, I'm going ignore the evidence and strawman your position"
English
0
0
0
1
ChadsterManster🌈
ChadsterManster🌈@Chadster_man·
@ThreeDog4746 @SirSicCrusader The “evidence” is that your book says it’s true. There is not evidence. Atheists actually look for truth in the world which is why we know about evolution, past human civilizations, and all the other religions that have come about in the world.
English
1
0
0
5
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@Omni_Chocobo @ShirouEmilia @SirSicCrusader Sorry I can't write an entire book in one or a few twitter comments lmao. Hence why im giving a book where honest people who actually want to learn can read something already compiled.
English
1
0
0
71
Bobby Corwen
Bobby Corwen@Omni_Chocobo·
@ThreeDog4746 @ShirouEmilia @SirSicCrusader I like how you mention this article/book whatever it is but you don't even have enough confidence in it to provide a link to it. It's like you keep saying you have evidence but yourself don't even believe any of the evidence you claim to have.
English
1
0
4
66
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@insey_cringe @Alt_Auric37 @SirSicCrusader If you simply don't want or know how to research I again recommend "The Case for Christ" Lee Strobel does an excellent job building a case. If/when I get time (and I remember to) I'll send some other sources as well.
English
1
0
0
54
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@danny_bttrmn @sammograph @SirSicCrusader So you're just going to ignore all manuscripts and letters between other well know figures at that time? Next you'll tell me the Holocaust isn't real.
English
1
0
0
29
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@Chadster_man @SirSicCrusader Many do deny history. Some due to hatred towards religious/specifically Christianity. The evidence is Jesus lived, died, and rose 3 days later. You can either accept the evidence or deny it.
English
0
0
0
44
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@kivakiva6 @SirSicCrusader You think my little pony is historical evidence? Yikes. I'm sorry the education system failed you.
English
0
0
0
93
clover 🍀
clover 🍀@avaluciarevilla·
@ThreeDog4746 @oshinolivor @penguin74us @ADHDSapphic @_celia_bedelia_ doesn’t matter. could is not is. prospective baby is not baby. the act of the strict regulation has never been achieved without consistent “unexpected” death, social criminalization, and facilitation of abuse. it’s expensive, cruel, and the justice imaginary. you aren’t relevant
English
1
0
17
247
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@cherbpilled @SirSicCrusader Bro you made an argument that science can't prove miracles to a post about empirical/historical evidence.
English
1
0
0
32
cherb
cherb@cherbpilled·
@ThreeDog4746 @SirSicCrusader I don’t really get what you’re trying to say here. It went from the Bible to this. What I was saying is that the standard to deduct scientific evidence is through empirical observation, which is often through the scientific method
English
1
0
0
35
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@insey_cringe @Alt_Auric37 @SirSicCrusader Luckily there are secular writings that support Christianity. Sure, luckily we have (again secular/non Christian) historical documents confirming Gospels, events, people. Assumptions that because the earliest writing we have is a copy means it never happened it's not logical.
English
2
0
0
144
Insey 🏳️‍⚧️
Insey 🏳️‍⚧️@insey_cringe·
@ThreeDog4746 @Alt_Auric37 @SirSicCrusader Religious documents are, by nature, biased towards a specific viewpoint Not to mention that the oldest book of the gospels was written at LEAST 40 years after Jesus death. It's unlikely that any of the traditional authors actually wrote those books. That's what REAL history says
English
1
0
0
153
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@avaluciarevilla @oshinolivor @penguin74us @ADHDSapphic @_celia_bedelia_ 1. You didn't even understand what I was saying. 2. Not even proper English 3. Babies and parasites are biologically distinct. Babies are offspring therefore symbiotic. Pure science. Obviously when there's legitimate danger for the mother, you do the best to save both lives.
English
2
0
1
595
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@oshinolivor @penguin74us @ADHDSapphic @_celia_bedelia_ If a sperm cell could individually, grow into a human then sure. That's not how it works. Sperm + egg = new human being. Very simple. Let's use science please. Scratching my arm is not mass genocide 🤣
English
2
0
2
646
oli
oli@oshinolivor·
@ThreeDog4746 @penguin74us @ADHDSapphic @_celia_bedelia_ is it genocide for a man to ejaculate. 1 billion sperm cells are released that die off. thats even worse than abortion no? and it happens millions of times per day. theres probably been trillions killed just this year
English
1
0
65
676
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@cherbpilled @SirSicCrusader "scientific proof is from empirical observation through scientific method." Followed by "Dont try to claim empirical evidence..." I'm assume you meant "scientific evidence" but I never claimed that so it looks like you think scientific method is how you get empirical.
James tweet media
English
1
0
0
127
cherb
cherb@cherbpilled·
@ThreeDog4746 @SirSicCrusader I said scientific proof COMES from empirical evidence/observation bro. You’re not even arguing whether the historical evidence of Jesus being divine is real anymore at this point
English
1
0
0
133
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@sammograph @SirSicCrusader Are you just quite literally saying all evidence of history is mundane? I figured you were using it in a figurative manner considering it's about the most well documented person.
English
2
0
0
282
Lostar
Lostar@sammograph·
Do you know what mundane means? And based on what I said what would lead you to assume I wouldn’t I believe in things before I was born, and how is that relevant to anything I said? Try reprocessing what I actually said.
English
1
0
13
267
James
James@ThreeDog4746·
@Anon10210920 @oshinolivor @penguin74us @ADHDSapphic @_celia_bedelia_ I'm assuming you're argument is supposed to say "and" not "or" otherwise you don't consider paralyzed or mute as human. Some can't even breathe on their own. 2nd. I'm glad you're pro life as per your definition. Those cells are 100% moving from conception.
English
2
0
0
45