๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜†

4.4K posts

๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† banner
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜†

๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜†

@XLiteStrategy

Fuck Crypto Ponzi Scam

Onchain ๊ฐ€์ž…์ผ Eylรผl 2023
595 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰182 ํŒ”๋กœ์›Œ
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
malone
malone@blainemaloneยท
get your own clkd.eth account at @staycloakedxyz
malone tweet media
English
0
1
2
100
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
cloaked
cloaked@staycloakedxyzยท
Update -- you no longer need an invite code to sign up!
cloaked@staycloakedxyz

We're excited to announce 'Incognito Mode' - powered by @0xprivacypools - (invite codes below) Your activity is yours. Demand more from your wallet. > Stealth addresses for unlinkability > Privacy pools for untraceability > Self-custodial always > Passkeys for seamless UX

English
4
5
14
910
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
cloaked
cloaked@staycloakedxyzยท
you should know when your balance is untraceable
olivia@livia___22

๐Ÿคฉ

English
1
2
5
926
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
cloaked
cloaked@staycloakedxyzยท
We're excited to announce 'Incognito Mode' - powered by @0xprivacypools - (invite codes below) Your activity is yours. Demand more from your wallet. > Stealth addresses for unlinkability > Privacy pools for untraceability > Self-custodial always > Passkeys for seamless UX
English
8
10
40
8.9K
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
malone
malone@blainemaloneยท
proud of this feature, incognito swaps coming soon... ๐Ÿ‘€
cloaked@staycloakedxyz

We're excited to announce 'Incognito Mode' - powered by @0xprivacypools - (invite codes below) Your activity is yours. Demand more from your wallet. > Stealth addresses for unlinkability > Privacy pools for untraceability > Self-custodial always > Passkeys for seamless UX

English
1
1
3
168
Simon Dedic
Simon Dedic@sjdedicยท
Funny how all of a sudden everyone is talking about @P2Pdotme just to rage bait. 9 out of 10 people commenting donโ€™t even know what the project does, yet everyoneโ€™s suddenly an expert. Here are my 2 cents: I reached out to the P2P team mid last year, way before I even knew the @MetaDAOProject raise was going to happen. I found the project, was genuinely excited about what they were building and wanted to stay close. Since then, Iโ€™ve spoken to their founders regularly. When the ICO came around, we got convicted pretty quickly, the conviction was already there, and the MetaDAO raise gave us the opportunity to build exposure at very attractive terms with a strong setup given the ownership coin structure. Weโ€™re now among the biggest contributors in this raise. So yes, I might be biased on what comes next: Was the Polymarket trade by the team a stupid move? Yes, absolutely. Do I believe this makes them a shady, untrustworthy team? Hell no. There was no bad intention behind it. No one with any common sense would risk a $6M raise over $15K. Their genuine intention was to create what they thought would be a guerrilla marketing stunt, very much in the spirit of crypto natives and trenchers. The idea was to show such strong conviction in the sale that theyโ€™d even bet on themselves. This is exactly why they intentionally named the account โ€œP2P team.โ€ Otherwise youโ€™d have to argue theyโ€™re the most incompetent insider traders of all time. Funnily enough, having spoken to this team several times, Iโ€™ve consistently been surprised by how transparent and honest they are compared to most founders I deal with. That hasnโ€™t changed. Neither has anything changed about P2P being a great project with real product-market fit, real traction and solving a real problem in emerging markets. Nor has anything changed about the founding team being hardworking people that I trust. The only thing I might question at this point is whether they should replace their marketing team. Hope this perspective helps. I understand why people are upset. But I genuinely believe this is a small, stupid mistake on what will be a long and successful journey for them. This too shall pass.
English
63
19
145
28.2K
Daavya.eth
Daavya.eth@Daavya_vaishnavยท
first in my entire bloodline to read bitcoin white paper
Daavya.eth tweet mediaDaavya.eth tweet media
English
38
12
821
17.4K
runn3rr.eth
runn3rr.eth@runn3rrrยท
Crypto teams never disappoint
runn3rr.eth tweet media
English
2
0
2
274
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Honey With Crypto
Honey With Crypto@honeywithcryptoยท
Why and Why not ๐Ÿ™‹โ€โ™‚๏ธ Meet @P2Pdotme token sale live on @MetaDAOProject A global P2P payment platform built for real people. Pros ๐Ÿ‘‡ > Buy & Sell your crypto into fiat > In India, you can directly use UPI to transact on p2p me > No need kyc, its working on zero knowledge > If your account gets frozen, the team steps in to help > Previous investors FDV are same as well public sale Cons โ€ผ๏ธ > Why does p2p me need a token? Use case still unclear > No price protection at launch dumping risk is real > High FDV ($15Mโ€“$23M+) in this market conditions is a concern > They suddenly shifted their base launchpad to @metadao a Solana project. โ€œMy take for check our detail video about p2p token saleโ€ youtu.be/mRKvn-e34nc?siโ€ฆ
YouTube video
YouTube
Honey With Crypto tweet media
English
12
2
30
2.6K
Achak
Achak@WolfAchakยท
@MetaDAOProject has became place where you can list your project for ICO , ask VC to fund it , do insider trading on @Polymarket don't know what this @metaproph3t is doing rn ? would like to know from him that , these things are allowed ? @multicoin what's your take on this ?
MetaDAO@MetaDAOProject

After 24 hours, the @P2Pdotme ICO has received over $4.8M in commitments from nearly 250 contributors! There are 72 hours left to join. Follow the link below to participate โฌ

English
1
0
0
35
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Uddalak
Uddalak@ninja_writer21ยท
Don't say I didn't warn you.
Uddalak tweet media
P2P.me (TGE arc)@P2Pdotme

A note on the Polymarket positions you've seen on-chain - the account named "P2P Team" is ours. We wanted to come out honestly. The capital came from our foundation account and all proceeds return to it. Here's the full picture. 10 days before our raise went live, we placed bets that we'd hit our $6M+ target. At that point we had one oral commitment from Multicoin ($3M) - no signed term sheets, no guaranteed allocations, nothing binding. We were betting on ourselves. We'd told the market we were raising over $6M. We believed we could. That bet was our way of backing our word with our own money at a moment when the outcome was genuinely uncertain. Over the following 10 days we made our case, secured commitments, and the raise closed at $5.2M - entirely from outside investors we don't control. We understand why this raises questions. Trading on an outcome you can influence erodes trust. We don't believe we were trading on a done deal, but we recognize reasonable people can see it differently. We named the account "P2P Team" deliberately - to give a marketing signal of our presence to the community and reflect our intent to be transparent. But intent isn't the same as action. Not disclosing at the time was a mistake we own. We took time to study the legal implications before speaking, which is why we stayed silent until now with a "No Comments" stance! - that too is a fair criticism. All proceeds go back into our futarchy-governed MetaDAO treasury. We will be liquidating all positions in the next few hours and are putting together a formal company policy on prediction market trading going forward. One thing we want to be unambiguous about: MetaDAO (@MetaDAOProject ) had zero knowledge of or involvement in these bets. We're genuinely excited to join this community and wanted to start on the right note - which means being straight with you about this.

English
7
3
70
6.8K
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
olivia
olivia@livia___22ยท
๐Ÿคฉ
GIF
QME
2
1
4
1K
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
Gautamgg ๐Ÿ•ต
Gautamgg ๐Ÿ•ต@Gautamguptaggยท
๐Ÿšจ Don't invest in metadao ICO - p2pdotme Here are top 10 reasons: > Why does a P2P company even need a token? What real utility does it provide to holders? > Founders and co-founders have not revealed their identities, why ??? > Market conditions are weak, and users are more mature now. > They claim ~$170K monthly expenses, yet most content is AI-generated - doesnโ€™t add up. > $550K revenue vs $170K/month burn , where are they even spending this much ? ๐Ÿคฃ > The team itself appears to be betting on Polymarket outcomes, possibly to drive hype. > Market sentiment is too weak - youโ€™ll likely end up at a loss. (Check last 4 sales of metadao) > At current market conditions, the FDV is too high > Running a company but not knowing how to talk to your own community - very professional ,lol.. > In simple terms, investors will use you as exit liquidity, and the team will make the money. Better to avoid investing for now - preserve your capital, Market conditions are uncertain.
Gautamgg ๐Ÿ•ต tweet mediaGautamgg ๐Ÿ•ต tweet mediaGautamgg ๐Ÿ•ต tweet media
English
72
15
241
18.6K
๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๋ฆฌํŠธ์œ—ํ•จ
cloaked
cloaked@staycloakedxyzยท
imagine your wallet had two balances, > Public: a stealth address balance with best effort unlinkability > Incognito: a compliant privacy pools balance with enhanced privacy Spend from either with clean UX via passkeys
cloaked tweet media
English
5
4
14
637