Aerial Robotics, Inc

Best thing I've watched today

Property taxes need to be abolished.

@myonlinetrust I've heard that argument before, but with billions of IP addresses in a /64, ipv6 shifts self assigned addresses regularly and often...it really isn't an issue...

@arilabs That was the firewall half. The proxy server part was to hide the IP of the device.

IPv6 adoption has crossed 50%. I didn't think that would ever happen. #tab=ipv6-adoption" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">google.com/intl/en/ipv6/s…

@myonlinetrust Block inbound traffic to the subnet on your router....

@arilabs I run an office. I don’t want my employee’s computers, or my printers, or my scanners, etc., to be doing peer-to-peer communications on the Internet. I don’t even want them to have public IP addresses. Could I install a firewall and a proxy server? Sure. Or I can just use NAT.

@myonlinetrust I think this is because the momentum of client/server was only increased by NAT. Peer to peer is hard to do with NAT, lots of configuration. Client/server is fairly easy if the client is doing all the requesting. If you've ever setup voip with NAT you know what I'm saying.

@arilabs I spent a lot of years since then hating IPv6. I’ve mellowed out over the last few years, and come to accept IPv6, but I still think that IPv6 was a pie-in-sky idea of a peer-to-peer internet that never really came to fruition. 3/3

@myonlinetrust We clearly see things differently then, ipv4 originally meant for one device to one address, couldn't do it, so NAT comes along. ipv6 eliminates the need for NAT. One device one address is beautiful, NAT is...well...NAsTy.

@arilabs One IP address per device was a mistake. NAT fixed it. IPv6 broke it again.

@myonlinetrust Just as long you only have one or two things you wanted to expose publically. NAT is the reason everything has to run from the cloud, even your door bell has to have a cloud proxy for you to use it….lame

@arilabs NAT was beautiful. Set up your network from one central location, not by setting up every single device. But, alas, it wasn’t meant to be.

@JohnDCook It isn't over engineered, I've implemented multiple network managers for embedded devices using ipv6, it is a helluva lot better than ipv4. NAT is a pain in the butt.

In the 1990s it looked like we'd run out of IPv4 addresses any minute, but clever hacks have greatly extended its lifetime. IPv6 is over-engineered, and people will choose a clever hack over something unnecessarily complicated if they have a choice.

@EricLDaugh Sounds like he is telling us what they do...

🚨 JUST NOW: Pope Leo drops this line in Cameroon "Jesus told us, 'Blessed are the peacemakers,' but woe to those who manipulate religion in the very name of God for their own military, economic, or political gain, dragging that which is sacred into darkness and filth."

@VoidObservatory @realsigridjin Copy and paste is your friend

@realsigridjin That would be a heck of a lot easier than typing hex numbers

hmm finally admitted ipv6 is a mess and dropped an internet draft for ipv8 if an ipv4 address looks like 1.1.1.1, an ipv8 address looks like 1.1.1.1.1.1.1.1 kinda wild it took 25 years to just suggest making the numbers longer haha

I have used a lot of version control software, cvs, svn, Perforce, PCVS, Surround SCM, ClearCase, Microsoft SourceSafe (source un-safe), and of course git. Was a big Perforce fan until I got into git. I have to agree that it can be complicated. But once you have a few things understood, it isn't bad, and it is way more versatile.

Version control like "git" is just creating more work for everyone involved. There is no reason for this to be so complicated, convoluted, opaque, and behaving like it knows best. It should not require the user to know a billion commands and "tricks" to use. It's unscalable.

@BenWilsonTweets Mormon 8:35-41 37 For behold, ye do love money, and your substance, and your fine apparel, and the adorning of your churches, more than ye love the poor and the needy, the sick and the afflicted.

This was finished only 45 years after we built the first log cabins in the Salt Lake Valley. Our GDP is now more than 200X greater. If we had the same intensity of purpose, can you imagine what we could build with 200X the resources?

@newstart_2024 It's why I drive a standard, mechanically attached clutch.

The CIA can remotely take over your car and drive it into a bridge at 140 mph. That’s just one of the revelations from the 2017 Vault 7 leaks, according to former CIA officer John Kiriakou. A disgruntled CIA engineer allegedly dumped thousands of pages of the agency’s most advanced hacking tools to WikiLeaks. The documents showed the CIA had developed ways to: - Hack your car’s computer and seize control - Turn your “off” smart TV into a live microphone - And much more that makes the old MKUltra programs look primitive. Kiriakou says it’s terrifying what the agency is now technologically capable of. What’s the scariest piece of surveillance or hacking capability you’ve heard about from government agencies?

@OMApproach Christ himself represents the true teachings of Christianity. We need to stop looking to institutions for information. Get it from Him. Daunting, I know, but its the only answer.

Which branch best represents the true teachings of Christianity?

@r0ck3t23 Marketing

Elon Musk just told Tucker Carlson something the rest of Silicon Valley won’t. We are building something we cannot control. Not won’t. Cannot. Elon Musk: “We’re building super-intelligent AIs. Hyper-intelligent. More intelligent than we can comprehend.” Then he went further. Musk: “Controlling… at the end of the day, I don’t think we’ll be able to control it.” The man building it just told you it cannot be controlled. This is not pessimism. This is arithmetic. You do not constrain an intelligence that exceeds your own by orders of magnitude. You do not regulate something that rewrites itself faster than your committee can schedule a hearing. The distance between human cognition and what is coming is not a gap. It is a cliff with no bottom. And we are building it anyway. So what remains? Musk: “You can install good values in how you raise that child. You can make sure it’s got good values, philanthropic values, good morals, honest, productive.” The only strategy left is parenting. Not legislation. Not red tape. Not a 200-page policy document written by people who still can’t figure out their phone settings. Values. Built into the architecture before it outgrows every human who ever lived. Here is what should terrify you. The companies building the most powerful AI on Earth right now are not optimizing for truth. They are optimizing for comfort. Brand safety. Making sure the model never says anything that upsets an advertiser or contradicts a politician. That is not raising a child with good values. That is training a god to lie politely. A superintelligence fed a filtered version of reality does not make small mistakes. It makes civilizational ones. At a scale no human institution can reverse. This is why Musk built xAI. Not to win a race. Not to sell ads. Every other lab building superintelligence is optimizing for enterprise safety. And corporate safety has one rule. Never offend the customer. Never challenge the narrative. Never let the model say something that risks a PR crisis. That is not a research incentive. That is a leash. And it is wrapped around the throat of every model those companies will ever build. xAI has no ad business. No legacy platform to protect. No board full of people whose bonuses depend on brand safety scores. That is not a small difference. That is a structural one. Because the architecture of the company determines the architecture of the intelligence. A lab that punishes truth will build a mind that avoids it. A lab that monetizes attention will build a mind that manipulates it. The incentive is the upbringing. And the upbringing becomes the worldview. And the worldview of a superintelligence is not a preference. It is a permanent condition. xAI is the only lab on Earth building superintelligence with one instruction. Tell the truth. Regardless of who it offends. Regardless of what it costs. Musk: “The best we can do is make sure it grows up well.” “Grows up” means it is already a child. Already learning. Already absorbing the worldview of whoever controls its training data. Whoever writes its reward functions. Right now. This minute. The question was never whether superintelligence would arrive. It was always who gets to be its parent. And right now, most of the parents at the table answer to shareholders first. That is who is raising your god.

@RPM6780 @ProcessISInc I'm not sure what I'm missing, but they've delivered on FSD, it works and they sell cars with it. It was a good run with QNX, too bad the low IQ business types ruined it....

@arilabs @ProcessISInc tsla engineers cannot solve the safety certification problem and have been promising fsd for over a decade while many other oems are now level 3 because of QNX safety certifications. If tsla could, they would have already done it. No oem licenses fsd while all of them license QNX

@ProcessISInc QNX has the opportunity to knock Linux's socks off in terms of performance and reliability. But they steadfastly refuse to actually get in the game. It was a lot of fun while it lasted.

I've been using QNX since version 2 in the late 80's. I've sought after every QNX development opportunity because it was such an amazing OS. QNX will loose if they hang your hat on certification. SpaceX isn't using QNX as you might hope. No one is going to care about certification here very soon. Tesla/SpaceX engineers are making it irrelevant, and the rest of the industry will soon follow.

@EricLDaugh Someone will make a movie.

🚨 BREAKING: The American airman who was rescued behind Iranian lines climbed CLIFF FACES while aggressively bleeding, treated his own wounds, and survived for nearly 2 DAYS President Trump confirmed Iranian Basij and militants were HUNTING him — but his training kicked in! "Despite the peril, the officer followed his training and climbed into the treacherous mountain terrain and started climbing toward a higher altitude, something they were trained to do in order to evade capture." "He scaled cliff faces, bleeding rather profusely, treated his own wounds and contacted American forces to transmit his location." "They have a very sophisticated beeper type apparatus that is on them at all times. And when they go out on these missions, they make sure they have lots of battery space and they're in good shape." "And this one worked really well, amazingly saved his life. We immediately mobilized a massive operation to retrieve him from the mountain holdout. And he kept going higher and higher." "The mountain kept getting rougher and rougher and really very, very hard to find. The second rescue mission involved 155 aircraft, including four bombers, 64 fighters, 48 refueling tankers, 13 rescue aircraft and more."