@_notoriousSMALL @FLDadReborn @EmjaeS99 See this is how you lose people.
3b is not of no "value" thats the statement of a half wit that doesn't grasp geopolitics, how we fund our military, etc.
Pleade attempt to do better.
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger
231K posts
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger
@chewyantz
I just repeat stuff I see online and I raw-dog the internutz.
Don-no 가입일 Mart 2015
7.5K 팔로잉1.1K 팔로워
@FLDadReborn @EmjaeS99 A billion dollars here, a billion dollars there, pretty soon you’re talking real money….real “tax payer” money that is….
And as far as $3B not being of any consequential value goes, that’s the kind of thinking that eventually leads to a $39T deficit….
Just say’n….
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger 리트윗함
The US government collects about $5 trillion in tax revenue a year.
We give Israel about $4 billion a year, mostly through US contractors for weaponry.
That’s 0.08% of our budget.
So the next time an idiot influencer says “instead of funding Israel we should fund X”.. ask them why the government doesn’t fund it with the remaining 99.92% of our budget?
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger 리트윗함
The CIA just openly admitted to running a deception campaign inside Iran. Yet we're supposed to believe they aren't running one on American citizens as well?
Sure Jan!
English
Kyle Kulinski: “If you are a political commentator and you have a take on Hasan Piker, do me a favor and just shut the fuck up. We’re living in a world where Donald Trump is waging an illegal and offensive war against Iran. The outline of WW3 is there for shit sure. Gas is absolutely skyrocketing. Our AI bubble is about to burst. We have a looming fucking global depression. We have war crime after war crime after war crime. All this shit is going on and we’re supposed to have a fucking conversation about Hasan Piker?”
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger 리트윗함
@MarcoFoster_ @KyleKulinski But I like dunking on Hasan
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger 리트윗함
@Brian_Peotter @MLiamMcCollum Why do you hate america?
English
Tucker is saying what needs to be said. It could come at a great cost, but that’s why it’s incredibly honorable.
Dave Smith@ComicDaveSmith
I can’t believe how hard Tucker just went at Trump and he is legitimately a modern American hero for doing it.
English
@MLiamMcCollum "What needs to be said"
Tucker: something something the jooooosss
Tucker: demons attacked me while sleeping
Tucker: I like russia and hate the US.
Tucker: let me buy this american house in Qatar.
GIF
English
@esjesjesj @chewyantz Putting existing data into bubbles is unfair. What if the context is I like squares?
English
@ZacksJerryRig @Constitutioncru @LeftismForU Citing random legal terms out of context is peak internet behavior.
English
@LeftismForU You know wars have rules right?
Rules of engagement...
Law of Armed Conflict (LOAC)...
Geniva convention...
Nuremberg trials...
English
@ZacksJerryRig @LeftismForU You not grasping what is and isnt legal is a you issue.
English
It is illegal to obey illegal orders.
It is illegal to obey illegal orders.
It is illegal to obey illegal orders.
It is illegal to obey illegal orders.
It is illegal to obey illegal orders.
It is illegal to obey illegal orders.
Congress has not declared War.
Pass it on.
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger 리트윗함
Let's pretend that is true.
Every single one of the past 3 Democrat presidents used the War Powers Resolution many times and carried out military actions without congressional approval, yet you Democrats were perfectly fine with it.
There were many times that Republicans were also fine with those different actions being taken - for example, Bin Laden being taken out. It's possible to recognize that some things are actually good without being retarded about it.
But Trump uses it and suddenly it's the end of the world and according to some is illegal and reason for impeachment.
(Also, I proved your original tweet wrong, and instead of conceding or countering it, you went and tried to change the topic being argued.)
English
Mr. Ant over lord secret burger 리트윗함
Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution, it designates the president as the "Commander in Chief" of the armed forces, and has been interpreted to grant the president authority to direct military actions - particularly in response to immediate threats - without prior congressional approval.
Additionally, the War Powers Resolution of 1973 - which was enacted to limit presidential military authority after Vietnam - allows the president to deploy forces without congressional approval under specific conditions.
But sure, go ahead, act retarded, and pretend like that is somehow illegal.
English