Computer Toucher
113 posts

Computer Toucher
@computerusr
autocomplete supervisor sharing lessons learnt

@BoringBiz_ you're missing that most companies don't have infinite demand for engineering output, at some point you have enough features and the 20% productivity gain just means you need fewer people to ship the same roadmap

The AI labor replacement theory makes absolutely no sense to me Here is the simple math Let’s say an engineer making $300K/yr was generating $500K in P&L output for me. Now I arm that engineer with $20K in input to make him 20% more productive My total engineering cost goes to $320K/yr but the output is now $600K (+20%) Because of AI, my ROI on hiring engineers just went up massively. As a CEO, that should make me want to hire more engineers, not less What am I missing here? Genuinely curious about people’s thoughts




Pets. Now in Codex. Use /pet to wake your pet.



Mistral Medium 3.5 is out and it's a dense 128B model

been a year since this post and we have definitely shifted towards liking more boilerplate-y explicit code vanilla used to mean simple but now it feels like a guarantee of ai going crazy and slopping shit up has anyone else felt this?




