rae

2.5K posts

rae banner
rae

rae

@cryptorae

did you expect something so soon?

가입일 Kasım 2017
428 팔로잉9.6K 팔로워
rae
rae@cryptorae·
People wonder why we get nostalgic.
English
2
0
12
2.1K
rae 리트윗함
Zaheer
Zaheer@zaheerebtikar·
It's been a long time coming but I'm thrilled to announce the official launch of Split Capital, a liquid digital assets fund. Split Capital, as a concept, has been in my mind for years now and it's been a dream to finally see it come to fruition. fortune.com/crypto/2024/01…
English
119
31
579
154.1K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
@simonw @rabbit_hmi Their solution to an app centric model is to have you give them unfettered access to every app you want to interact with. It’s like plaid, with none of the accountability and 1000x the attack surface,
English
0
0
2
844
Simon Willison
Simon Willison@simonw·
@rabbit_hmi Does the agent require confirmation for everything it does, or can it occasionally take actions without confirmation? it looked like it could send an email without approval there If it can ever act without confirmation, do you have mitigations in place against prompt injection?
English
3
3
163
82.7K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
It's 100% a fake. Some people should probably tweet less but I guess why would you when you get clout and engagement for being a moron. (Bookmark this)
English
3
0
3
1.2K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
Zooming out, you can almost see the brush strokes the hacker made with the brush tool over the original text and quotation marks. It's also obvious no such alteration was made to the name and image of Gensler, as they were not needed.
rae tweet media
English
1
0
3
1.5K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
Run an error level analysis (ELA), and the forgery will reveal itself. ELAs show how an image has been compressed. Compression should be uniformly applied across an image, but with altered images, the ELA looks different because you've created different layers of lossiness.
English
2
0
3
1.6K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
Comparing the two images side by side: 1. Quotation marks are different, short, sharp tail vs long, dull tail. 2. The hacker's graphic uses a different typeface for the quote and speaker. 3. Very weird compression artifacts in the hacker's version. How can we be sure it's fake?
rae tweet mediarae tweet media
English
1
0
3
1.2K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
The photo is the clue. It's not the current official portrait of Gensler. If you reverse search it, you'll find the SEC used the same template for a tweet in 2021. So the original design-based refutation for draft theory is invalidated. Maybe it's real? twitter.com/SECGov/status/…
rae tweet media
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission@SECGov

Do you know why SEC Chair Gary Gensler asked SEC staff to make recommendations on how the Commission might consider freshening up Rule 10b5-1? A thread with some of Chair Gensler’s take on the matter:

English
1
0
2
1.8K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
"U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION" looks official, like a digital letterhead. However, the SEC uses something else. The image is feeling less official. btw @SECGov you have been misspelling "U.S." as "U.S" for the past three years. You may want to update your template.
rae tweet mediarae tweet mediarae tweet mediarae tweet media
English
1
0
5
983
rae
rae@cryptorae·
The design itself is not disqualifying: 1. The SEC has sometimes used Arial. 2. They've also used other shades of blue. 3. The seal isn't on everything they produce. 4. Gensler is inconsistently titled, see "SEC CHair". So you look for other anchors.
rae tweet mediarae tweet mediarae tweet mediarae tweet media
English
1
0
3
1K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
At first blush the writing is fine. The graphics are fishy, however: 1) ETF announcement font is Arial, different from the SEC's usual Gotham. 2) No SEC seal. 3) The color is rgb(1, 53, 104), differently from the SEC's usual rgb(0, 56, 99) 4) "Chair, Gary Gensler"?
rae tweet media
English
1
0
7
1.1K
will depue
will depue@willdepue·
who do you know/what book have you read that has the most comprehensive understanding of how to model the world?
English
361
64
994
1.1M
rae
rae@cryptorae·
I’m so glad this is over. Can we go back to remembering that OpenAI’s censorship was actually the most effective of the big LLM’s, that the criticism of Sam was for nerfing GPT-4 via RLHF, and that Anthropic’s Claude was the go-to model for people to engage in BDSM role play?
OpenAI@OpenAI

We have reached an agreement in principle for Sam Altman to return to OpenAI as CEO with a new initial board of Bret Taylor (Chair), Larry Summers, and Adam D'Angelo. We are collaborating to figure out the details. Thank you so much for your patience through this.

English
0
0
2
989
rae
rae@cryptorae·
This Joseph Gordon-Levitt thing is going to be significant. TIL he’s also a vocal EA. If Tasha holds steady, they are heroes in Hollywood and EA. Maybe a 10 minute ovation at the SAG awards. Maybe JGL gets an actual role again. If she flips, they’re both out of the in-groups.
rae tweet media
English
0
0
1
447
rae
rae@cryptorae·
It struck me on dev day that GPTs, all the way down to the monetization aspect, were a clone of Poe’s core product. TIL that @adamdangelo is on OpenAI’s board. Not saying that’s why Sam was fired, but that’s how you lose the tipping vote.
English
1
0
7
2.5K
Joe Weisenthal
Joe Weisenthal@TheStalwart·
I wonder if this comment from the new CEO infers a greater focus on commercialization of existing tech, and less focus on aggressively pushing the technological frontier
Joe Weisenthal tweet media
English
3
1
21
18.1K
rae
rae@cryptorae·
Huge for Microsoft, though. Ambitions clearly bigger than just building LLMs.
English
0
0
0
323
rae
rae@cryptorae·
On the other hand, if the totality of talent and magic of the folks at Open AI migrate to Microsoft.. this is a company that phones home every time you blink.
English
1
0
0
348
rae
rae@cryptorae·
This is disappointing. On one hand, this is clearly a good move to shore up the stock price and lend credibility to their future product ambitions. If anything, they’re probably going to give Sam a blank check to pursue his chip ambitions as well.
English
2
0
1
490