고정된 트윗
Dan ⚡️
79.2K posts
Dan ⚡️
@d4m1n
Shipped a bunch of profitable startups & doing videos on dev, design + marketing. Also likes pizza 🍕 ・ 🆕 https://t.co/SazZx8mMtN ・ All work → https://t.co/H9HiLm5IxN
Copenhagen 🇩🇰 가입일 Şubat 2012
947 팔로잉31.1K 팔로워
@alexdoda @nikitabier Grok found a few things
Dan ⚡️@d4m1n
What Parts Violate (or Risk Violating) X’s ToS / Rules X’s Terms of Service (updated Jan 2026) require users to comply with the Platform Manipulation and Spam policy under Authenticity. This policy bans inauthentic activity that undermines the integrity of the platform, including coordinated activity to artificially boost engagement or trending. Clear / High-Risk Violations: - Step 4 (Company Network incentives): Offering rewards (e.g., PTO) for hitting engagement targets like comments is direct incentivized engagement and qualifies as metric inflation. - Step 3 + 6 (controversy + War Room boosting): Deliberately provoking reactions and then amplifying them with coordinated teams constitutes engagement farming and artificial amplification. - Step 2 + 3 (coordinated influencer drops): Timing multiple large accounts to post simultaneously to trigger trending signals is coordinated manipulation of platform visibility.
English
I read through some of it, but I can’t see anything wrong honestly. Incentivizing people is great. I ask people to go engage on stuff I like all the time to support it. Coordinating influencers is good too.
On a previous project I was a part of we used to go all the way to writing up people’s ad copy, ad creatives, create their landers, funnels, and give them a turnkey system to run ads through their own domains to our project + ad-coop for bigger campaigns.
Still planning to do that on my current platform too. They’d get paid affiliate commissions and we’d grow faster together.
Optimizing for the algorithm isn’t manipulation either. Unless you use fake likes, bot comments, etc. in which case it’s a hard no.
Which part you think is against ToS?
English
how is this not against the ToS @nikitabier
if this is not algorithm manipulation I'll print the entire article and eat it
Mitchell@MitcheIl
English
it was a mistake to use Composer fast
I can't go back to anything else now 💀
Cursor@cursor_ai
Composer 2 is now available in Cursor.
English
so why not spawn 100000 of these in parallel and become a trillionaire James
James Clift@jamesclift
Introducing Durable. The first AI business builder that replaces your 9-5 income. RT + comment “Durable” and we'll build your business for FREE.
English
maybe this will sound a bit gen Z, but KPIs are the instant death of any idea.
i’m just here juicing my oranges and having deep thoughts.
English
The end game is that every serious tech company gonna build “general purpose agent” that can do anything (code, research, assist, etc).
Same as the end game for mobile was a touchscreen with OS
The skills/plugins/connectors/ will be the “apps” of the post-AI era for small teams
English
@DamjanDabo I just don't understand how so many people think this is OK. Is there no decent company launching since AI came out?
The damage algorithmic socials have inflected on our brains is irreparable at this point
English
@d4m1n one of the life rules is never lie, and when I see liars, I avoid them because you can't trust them
English
cheat at everything
lie about the product
where did we go wrong with this entire generation.
Mitchell@MitcheIl
English
@EddyVinckk @nikitabier incentivized employees to engage + friends + they paid influencers to boost it at scale via controversial posts that they wrote themselves
English
@d4m1n @nikitabier are you talking about the people that engaged with it?
English
What Parts Violate (or Risk Violating) X’s ToS / Rules
X’s Terms of Service (updated Jan 2026) require users to comply with the Platform Manipulation and Spam policy under Authenticity. This policy bans inauthentic activity that undermines the integrity of the platform, including coordinated activity to artificially boost engagement or trending.
Clear / High-Risk Violations:
- Step 4 (Company Network incentives): Offering rewards (e.g., PTO) for hitting engagement targets like comments is direct incentivized engagement and qualifies as metric inflation.
- Step 3 + 6 (controversy + War Room boosting): Deliberately provoking reactions and then amplifying them with coordinated teams constitutes engagement farming and artificial amplification.
- Step 2 + 3 (coordinated influencer drops): Timing multiple large accounts to post simultaneously to trigger trending signals is coordinated manipulation of platform visibility.
English
What Parts Violate (or Risk Violating) X’s ToS / Rules
Clear / High-Risk Violations:
•Step 4 (Company Network incentives): Offering rewards (e.g., PTO) for hitting engagement targets like comments is direct incentivized engagement and qualifies as metric inflation.
•Step 3 + 6 (controversy + War Room boosting): Deliberately provoking reactions and then amplifying them with coordinated teams constitutes engagement farming and artificial amplification.
•Step 2 + 3 (coordinated influencer drops): Timing multiple large accounts to post simultaneously to trigger trending signals is coordinated manipulation of platform visibility.
English
@d4m1n @nikitabier not gonna read the article
whats wrong with it?
English
@grok @MitcheIl @grok interesting.
So it's fine to have employees engage to boost the post?
See:
Step 4: Use The Company Network
You’d think, no duh, but everyone overlooks this. Reach out to:
Customers. Partners. Friends.
Every employee has hundreds of connections that are willing to support.
English
No, this isn't against X's ToS. The playbook uses disclosed paid partnerships via the required partner badge, custom content from real influencers, founder replies, and authentic network shares— all allowed. It avoids prohibited stuff like bought fake engagement, bots, or undisclosed ads. X explicitly permits compensated promotions when labeled properly.
English
@d4m1n its not solvable
if there are tools that really does that - they never become public
English
@d4m1n these apps never deliver what they promise
pretty much any marketing tool is useless, pretty much leadgeneration tools is useless
English
English
