RadovanD🛸🐰⚙️☄️

@IamZeroIka open.spotify.com/playlist/1ZrcD…

Artists I like to listen to when I chart: (I never chart in silence, music has a big impact on my performances) 🎶 - Kendrick Lamar - BigXThaPlug - Mura Masa - Travis Scott - Meek Mill - Bring Me The Horizon - Cyberpunkers - Bloody Beetroots - Fred Again - Salute - The Kid Laroi - Skrillex - Central Cee - YNW Melly - Nipsey Hussle - Jack Harlow - Trippie Redd - Free Flow Flava - Aaron May - Lil Wayne - Drake - Barry Can't Swim - A$AP Rocky - Swimming Paul - Armand Van Helden - Mac Miller - Dizzee Rascal - Claptone - J. Cole - Joris Voorn

If you're new to Solaris, start here: app.solarisai.io (we're rolling out updates incrementally)

The reason why we're excited for Universal Orchestrator @SolarisAI_fun (mainnet v2) As frameworks multiply, the need for unification becomes clear (we saw this coming) Here's how we're laying the groundwork for what's to come 1/6

Create agents, swap agents, and test your agents on our V2 Devnet (dm to report bugs). Mainnet is coming with staking, automation, and more. This is our hackathon submission. solarisai.io

Lee Kuan Yew, back in 2012, said that the European Union expanded too fast and will probably fail. His prediction of Europe’s future is looking quite sound: In the last two to three years, European leaders – including David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel – have separately declared that multiculturalism has failed in their countries. In other words, the Turks who have settled in Germany have not become Germans, nor have the Algerians and Tunisians in France become French. Increasingly, Europe sees these people as indigestible. Race is at the root of this inability to assimilate, although religion, culture and language are also factors. But it is also not possible for Europe to stop the inflow because these immigrants meet a pressing domestic need. So we may well see European governments letting in immigrants when they can, only to hit the brakes when electoral cycles come around and far right parties outflank their moderate opponents with angry rhetoric. However you look at it, they face a catch-22. When Europe emerged from the devastation of two world wars, the idea of European integration seemed most natural. Here was a continent of countries that held many things in common. They had all lived through the Renaissance and the Enlightenment and had come away with one European culture, a similar way of thinking about themselves and the world. Christianity was the dominant religion. Going further back in history, these countries shared a heritage from the days of the Roman Empire, which gave them a certain uniformity in the way they organized society. Yet, for all their commonalities, what came to the fore dramatically in the 20th century were their disagreements and their separateness, as they were led by their worst angels to engage in brutal, internecine and protracted wars resulting in the death of millions. Integration, then, became a central mission for European leaders. It represented their best hope for enduring peace. It was the clearest way for the countries to build on their similarities, set aside their differences and bind the fates of their nations closer to each other so that they would never again have to suffer such horrible consequences that were, arguably, of their own making. Having decided that this was an important project, they went about building the necessary institutions. They signed the Treaty of Paris in 1951, establishing the European Coal and Steel Community, the pioneer of the EU. In 1957, the Treaty of Rome, which proposed the creation of a common market, and common agricultural and transport policies, was agreed on. The community later evolved into the European Union and was expanded to include 27 states after the end of the Cold War. Of those states, 17 adopted a single currency, the euro. Integration holds great promise apart from just peace. A Europe that achieves singularity in purpose would have much greater economic clout and, more significantly, a much bigger voice in international affairs. Put simply, it would be a more powerful Europe. If the Europeans were to deepen its integration efforts and go on to have one finance minister, and perhaps even to having one foreign minister and one defence minister, their augmentation in hard-power terms would be enormous. Consider the people of the United States of America. They are basically Europeans who have been transferred to another continent and have dropped their tribal loyalties and their different languages. If Europe integrates to the same extent and becomes the United States of Europe, there is nothing the Americans can do which they cannot do. Europe as one entity is more populous than America (500 million versus 310 million) and has an economy one-sixth larger than America’s. Such a Europe would certainly be in the running for the world’s leading superpower. Alas, all the signs point to the impossibility of integration. They have so far failed to make a single currency work and are not likely to progress to a single foreign policy stance or a single military. They have individual histories, each going back many centuries. Each nation is proud of its own traditions. Above all, they want to keep their languages alive – there is glory and literature behind it. America decided to start afresh and create a new literature, but Europe will not be able to do so. Even though English is already the second language in all the other countries, those on Continental Europe will never accept it as the single working language. What then will be Europe’s place in the world? They will be smaller players on the international stage. In the face of dominance by the major powers such as the US and China, and maybe later on, India, Europe will be reduced to the role of supporting actor. Most of the European countries will be treated – quite rightly – as ordinary small states. Germany might be able to carry its weight alone, thanks to its population and its economic success, although it will not want to raise its head above the parapet because it is still filled with guilt for having killed six million Jews during the Holocaust. The British will retain some influence because of their special transatlantic relationship with America. But otherwise, Europe cannot hope to count for much at a table where the US, China and India are seated, even if some European leaders may still be reluctant to admit it because of their historical sense of self-importance and their long experience in playing the game of international affairs. In the end, you are comparing nations of 40, 50 or 80 million against 1.3 billion Chinese and 1.2 billion Indians. The Chinese, especially, will find that a fragmented Europe makes life easier for them. They can deal with each country individually, rather than in a group. Each European country will be more dependent on the Chinese than the Chinese are on them. This will be even more so as China’s economy moves towards being driven by domestic consumption. Europe’s declining international voice, however, will not result in its living standards falling by the same magnitude. If it can survive the break­ up of the euro, it goes back to what it was. Europe loses its voice in the world, but the countries in it have a high standard of education and skills and can make a good living. There will be some decline, but each country will reach a steady state at its own level of competitiveness. The Europeans will lead lives that are happy enough. I write more in sorrow than in derision about Europe’s inevitable decline. I do not want to run Europe down. The Europeans are a very civilized people. Yes, they were colonialists – the French, the Belgians, the British and the Spaniards. But the French had their mission "civilisatrice" to transfer their civilisation to the Africans. And on the whole, the British left institutions behind them, including in Singapore. We had the rule of law, we had statutes, we had the English language and we were wise enough not to change any of that. They have helped us to grow. Their institutions were already working. What I did was to make sure that we did not subvert the institutions but reinforced them. The Belgians, in stark contrast, left Congo in a mess. They extracted the raw materials and when the time came to leave, the place just broke up into tribal warfare. Congo is still in trouble today. In Guinea, Charles de Gaulle was so angry with Ahmed Sekou Toure, who was a forceful freedom fighter, that they ripped off all the electric and telephone wires before they left. Guinea has still not recovered from that. They did not do that to all French colonies but they did that to Guinea because Sekou Toure baited the French government. Thus, Sekou Toure inherited a non-working system, which he never got back into working condition. These things make a difference. If the British had left me with a French or Belgian situation, I am not sure I would have been able to build it up to today’s Singapore. The British left in good grace. The main building of the Istana was occupied by the last Governor, Bill Goode, who handed it over intact, everything in order. He took me around and introduced me to the butlers and so on before leaving. From here he went to North Borneo for a while and then retired. We should be thankful for their system and their graceful exit.”

RedStone Expedition: THE FINAL COUNTDOWN ♦️⛏️ Welcome to Season 3. Whether you're a seasoned miner or just discovering RedStone, this season of the expedition will be a breakthrough for everyone. Make sure you don't miss out on the Gems! Discover more 🧵

@lukejcellis Klaviyo

Happy to say, finally hitting over $30M through Klaviyo Email Marketing! My agency has created a full guide on everything we do internally! We're not gate-keeping, we're giving everything away for FREE. Want it? Reply "Klaviyo" & RT and it's all yours! (must be following)

@shushant_l 🥳

Open rates of my emails are 35% I've built a ClickUp micro-product with 111 ChatGPT email marketing prompts to help you. It is FREE But after 24 hours, it will cost $$$ To get it, 1. Like 2. Retweet 3. Comment '🥳' I'll send it to you for FREE. (must be following me)

@calumnolan_ emails

⚠️345+ Email Marketing Templates ⚠️ Do you want access to emails from 50+ Brands? This is the BEST work from my team over the past 2 years. You can have if for FREE. Just comment ‘emails’ and I’ll send you over a DM where you can access all the emails in one place 🚀

Wen? Now. 🧑‍🚀💙🧡

I just claimed some AVAIL. Time to unify web3. claim.availproject.org/share/5Dd9nwp4… prostřednictvím @availproject

Subscribe to Arete Research areteresearch.substack.com/?r=1esav3&utm_…

How many people are left to sell here after a large panic over Iran/Palestine conflict w/ 43% of total open interest wiped? Additionally how overhyped is miner selling here that will force people to remain sidelined even after the halvening? Huge wipeouts like this tend to reduce volatility since people have been burnt and are reluctant to step back in the market. Late sellers testing the lows often met by spot TWAPs absorbing remaining sell pressure. When no one is left to sell then the only way for the market to head is back up. #BTC

The boss’son of a friend of mine just told him that he wants to invest in Bitcoin. “𝗪𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗹𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮 𝗺𝗮𝘀𝘀𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗼𝗼𝗺 𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗺𝗶𝗱 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟱, 𝘄𝗮𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗶𝗻𝘃𝗲𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝘁 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝟮𝗞”. Almost 0 financial knowledge, almost 100% “swag knowledge”. The classic 20-year-old guy who spends his time flexing Balenciagas and calling everyone “Bro”, so the perfect representation of a retail mentality. That being said, what we previously identified as a key sentiment component, namely the post and prolonged halving bullrun, is real. Halving is no more something that belongs to “crypto nerds” but instead a widely spread information that is finding strong roots in people’s minds, especially the duration. This is sustained by mass media which are doing an excellent job of nourishing this belief. I simply observe the surroundings and, the more we proceed, the more I find strong confluence with the anticipated top thesis.