Dennis Littlefield

66.4K posts

Dennis Littlefield banner
Dennis Littlefield

Dennis Littlefield

@dlfield

USMC ‘91-‘95 | BS | MBA | Mensa | 10th (at least) Generation American (colonial+) | An Ally | P.S...

North Richland Hills, Texas 가입일 Haziran 2009
1.9K 팔로잉1.8K 팔로워
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
🐸Frogs2Destroy🐸
🐸Frogs2Destroy🐸@Frogs2Destroy·
I will continue to repost the @CFWBers every day. Heroes! 🙏🐸🇺🇸
🐸Frogs2Destroy🐸 tweet media
English
1
2
3
13
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Holly Kesler
Holly Kesler@HollyKesler·
So good to see these gentleman on stage and speaking to the voters of Georgia!
Burt Jones@burtjonesforga

Thank you to the GA Black Republican Council and Dr. Camilla Moore for hosting us last night, and to @shelleywynter1 for moderating. While some of my opponents decided this event wasn't worth their time, I enjoyed a night of thoughtful questions from community members who deserved answers. Thank you to the opponents who did attend and all of you who joined us — grateful for the opportunity and the conversation. #gapol

English
2
5
18
341
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Rep. Anna Paulina Luna
New evidence from ODNI confirms what many suspected: intel was manipulated and weaponized to justify baseless attacks against Donald Trump in an effort to delegitimize his presidency before it even began. These lies also resulted in destroying our relationships with nuclear superpower Russia. Well done @CIADirector and @DNIGabbard for shedding light on what is now considered to be the most corrupt scandal in the history of American government.
English
1.5K
3.4K
11.8K
208.1K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Jesse Michels
Jesse Michels@AlchemyAmerican·
🚨BREAKING: NASA's Lead Electrostatics Scientist claims he’s discovered a “new force” that counteracts gravity with no fuel necessary. Dr. Charles Buhler has run 2,000 vacuum chamber experiments showing a propellantless thrust force that persists after the power is switched off, and cannot be explained by ion wind, magnetic effects, or classical energy conservation. The input is pure electricity and the output is millinewtons of thrust counteracting gravity. He believes his work vindicates the legacy of midcentury antigravity pioneer Thomas Townsend Brown and will lead to a new paradigm of propellantless deep space travel that transcends chemical combustion rockets🚨 Charles Buhler has a PhD in condensed matter physics from Florida State University, spent over two decades at NASA's Electrostatics and Surface Physics Laboratory at Kennedy Space Center (which he now leads), and is the incoming president of the Electrostatic Society of America. He is NASA’s authority on electrostatics. His colleague Andrew Aurigema, a 35-year veteran engineer working from the Townsend Brown electrogravitics lineage, developed a parallel version of the same experiment independently, and the two discovered each other through a mutual colleague who had been watching both of them work in silence for years. Together, under their company Exodus Propulsion Technologies, they have tested nearly 2,000 variations of what they believe is a previously undocumented force. He’s also developed a quantum electrodynamics based theory to explain his results. Buhler’s patent is now under formal examination by the U.S. Patent Office with affidavit-signing witnesses being contacted independently. This is the future of space travel, beyond chemical combustion. With Rocketry, we can only get to Proxima Centauri B in 80,000 years. And you’d burn through the fuel well before that. It’s completely untenable for interstellar travel. 1. Buhler’s Skeptic Mentor Stopped Cold in 2010 The first demonstration happened in a non-vacuum lab using a laser aimed at a wall to detect small displacements. Buhler had his future brother-in-law run the test. His mentor, Dr. Sid Clements, an electrostatics expert who had dismissed the work entirely, watched the laser move and immediately abandoned what he was doing. He walked over, ran through a series of verification steps on the spot, and never questioned the reality of the effect again. That was 2010. It took two more years working with Drew before Buhler realized the force appeared even without any B field or current present. He wasn't in the field momentum regime at all. He was in pure electrostatics. 2. The Force is Not Explainable by Newton’s Laws or Ion Wind Ion wind produces thrust in the same direction the ionized air is traveling. The “Exodus force” (Buhler’s name for his new force) produces thrust perpendicular to the expected ion wind direction, reverses cleanly when the device is flipped, and remains present inside a sealed enclosure where no ionized air can escape. Buhler documented this publicly with video: a balsa lifter placed inside a sealed plastic box on a scale, powered up, lifts internally while the scale reads flat. That is conservation of momentum. That is what ion wind looks like. The Exodus force is something different, and Buhler, as the person who leads NASA's only electrostatics lab, is in an unambiguous position to make that distinction. 3. 2,000 Variations, All Producing the Same Result Since beginning collaboration with Drew, Buhler has tracked nearly 2,000 distinct test articles, each tested multiple times. Pendulums. Spinners. Rotators. Force plates. Scales. Pendulum deflections inside Faraday cages. Reversed polarity tests. Vacuum chamber runs at multiple pressure levels. DC-only configurations that eliminate magnetic field artifacts entirely. Every geometry, every material, every packaging approach. The force appears consistently. When a confounding variable is proposed, they address it, run the modified test, and the force is still there. Buhler says if an exotic explanation remains, it is not one he or any colleague has been able to name. 4. The Device Generates Thrust With the Power Off This is the finding that breaks the classical framework entirely. After charging the device and disconnecting it from the power supply, the thrust continues. The capacitor does not drain in the way a simple energy storage calculation would predict. Put on a scale, the weight reduction persists. Buhler's description: if placed in space with the power off, the device would accelerate. He cannot explain that to the scientific community and says so directly. David Chester, who has independently interacted with Drew through APEC sessions and private communications, said he cannot think of a prosaic explanation for this. The phenomenon has been reproduced enough times across enough configurations that calling it experimental error is no longer a defensible position. 5. The Implications of This for Past Antigravity Work Buhler believes his work is derivative of and related to Townsend Brown’s midcentury asymmetric capacitor experiments also showing thrust with pure electricity as the input. Chemical combustion is limited - plain and simple - we can’t get to the nearest habitable planet (Proxima Centauri B) in close the amount of time we’d need; it would take us 80,000 years and we’d burn through the fuel before we got there. It’s a checkmate in one argument against anyone claiming rockets are the frontier of efficiency. This was the dream of Thomas Townsend Brown – one that got stifled and suppressed behind the veil of secrecy and subcompartments. The common trope from experiments around the world are high electric field differentials seem to result in thrust. Buhler’s experiment exists in this lineage. 6. The Patent Office is Running the Peer Review Buhler made a deliberate choice not to pursue academic peer review as a primary path. His second patent is currently under examination, and the examiner's office has been reaching out to independent witnesses who have signed affidavits confirming they have seen and reproduced the effect. Buhler describes this as equivalent to scientific peer review, run by people with no financial interest in the outcome. His first patent may have been held under a national security review process before release. He does not confirm this, but he was aware it was a risk when he filed. 7. A QED Theorist Could Poke Holes in the Theory, But Not the Experiment We brought in UCLA PhD David Chester to evaluate Buhler’s ideas on quantum electrodynamics (which might account for the thrust being seen). David Chester's contribution was not to validate the theory Buhler proposed. He found some issues with the specific scalar virtual photon framing Buhler had developed. What Chester could not do was provide a prosaic explanation for the experimental results themselves. He said directly that, of all the anomalous phenomena he has surveyed, Buhler and Drew's work ranks in the top ten for experimental persuasiveness, specifically because of the iteration rate and the self-consistency across configurations. He noted that Drew's innovation rate alone, constantly testing new geometries and material stacks, is unlike anything he has seen from other groups making similar claims. Buhler pointed out that his theories were based on time-independent perturbation theory which Chester admits requires further examination from him. 8. NASA's UAP Investigation Had No Physicists Buhler and his wife, an engineer in NASA's Launch Services Program, were approached to assist with NASA's second UAP follow-on investigation. When Buhler asked to be placed with the physicists on the project, he was told there were none. The group was instrumentation-focused. Buhler says he was genuinely shocked. His reaction, expressed directly: if you are facing objects that defy the laws of physics, why is there not a single physicist in the room. He described the same reaction Eric Davis has expressed publicly. This is either institutional brain death or something else is happening somewhere else. 9. Six Lights Emerged from the Ocean Near Patrick Air Force Base Around 2013, Buhler and his wife were alone on the beach near Cocoa Beach, Florida, three miles south of Patrick Air Force Base. A red light appeared roughly three miles offshore, grew extremely bright, then appeared to explode, lighting the full length of beach. A helicopter launched from Patrick Air Force Base, flew to the location, hovered briefly, and returned to base without intervening. The light did not stop. It began moving toward them. At some point it split from one light into six rotating orange-pink lights that went under the water and re-emerged in a repeating cycle. The lights tracked their movement along the beach for forty minutes, closing to within roughly fifty yards before disappearing. Buhler says similar lights have been reported by others in the same area, and Stephen Greer runs group observation sessions approximately forty minutes south of the same beach. 10. The Force Crosses the Unity Threshold for Space Already The current demonstrated force is in the five to ten millinewton range. For Earth launch, that is not yet sufficient, and Buhler does not claim otherwise. For orbital station-keeping, for preventing satellite orbital decay, for repositioning between orbits in microgravity, the force exceeds what is needed. Buhler calls this hitting unity for space, moon, and Mars applications without any major development beyond what has already been demonstrated. The self-launcher, a device capable of lifting itself from Earth's surface, is the declared goal. No blueprints exist yet for the energy requirements. But the force is real, it is directional, it reverses on command, and it does not require continuous power to sustain. Why This Matters NASA's lead electrostatics scientist ran nearly 2,000 controlled experiments, eliminated every prosaic explanation the field has available, documented a thrust that persists after the power is cut, watched the fine structure constant emerge from the data repeatedly, and submitted a second patent currently under formal examination. A QED theorist with no commercial stake in the outcome reviewed the experimental claims and could not find a conventional explanation. The standard debunking line for this entire lineage of experiments has always been ion wind. That argument has been answered, documented, and filmed. What remains is a force that requires either new physics or an error that two decades of systematic testing has not been able to locate. The patent process will resolve part of this. The vacuum chamber footage will resolve more of it. Full conversation is live now. The next stage in human space travel is here.
English
134
325
1.6K
113.1K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
The SCIF
The SCIF@TheSCIF·
Court sides with DOJ over FBI raid in Fulton County, ruling that the FBI did NOT violate their constitutional rights. Another HUGE WIN for election integrity!
English
40
1.1K
4.2K
28.1K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Holly Kesler
Holly Kesler@HollyKesler·
🚨Georgia State Ethics Commission charges Delaware-based “Georgians for Integrity” with campaign finance and lobbying violations. The group spent millions on thousands of undisclosed attack ads against Lt. Gov. Burt Jones — without registering as an independent political committee, disclosing donors, or registering their lobbying activities. The commission found probable cause. The group calls the charges baseless. Full story: ajc.com/politics/2026/…
Holly Kesler tweet media
English
6
25
41
865
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Vice President JD Vance
“[Fraud] has to stop. The President of the United states has ordered us to stop it, and that's what this task force is going to do” - Vice President Vance🇺🇸
English
2.2K
1.8K
9.6K
172K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Patrick Byrne
Patrick Byrne@PatrickByrne·
Air-Gapped Systems Hacked? The Shocking Truth Revealed! Claims that “air-gapped” systems are untouchable are being challenged—hidden modems and internal connectivity could provide access points, raising serious questions about how secure these systems really are. Full interview @RealAlexJones
English
23
196
415
8.8K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Mindy MF Robinson 🦄
Mindy MF Robinson 🦄@iheartmindy·
Remember when we had this beautiful movement to Make America Great Again....so the Deep State murdered one of its key figures and replaced him with a slew of bloodthirsty war pigs everyone hated? If this is a war of information....you're losing, because we see through all of it.
English
35
106
566
6.6K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Promethean Action
Promethean Action@PrometheanActn·
Latest insights on coup vs Trump from @BarbaraMBoyd Three fabricated scandals. One target. The receipts are finally being declassified — and almost nobody is covering it. A thread on the most consequential political fraud in American history.
Barbara M Boyd@BarbaraMBoyd

🧵 Three fabricated scandals. One target. The receipts are finally being declassified — and almost nobody is covering it. A thread on the most consequential political fraud in American history. 👇 Russiagate: The Factory Before the 2016 election, US intelligence consistently assessed Russia was "probably not trying to influence the election by cyber means." Then Obama held a Dec. 9, 2016 NSC meeting with Brennan, Clapper, and Susan Rice. A brand new assessment appeared claiming Putin helped Trump. Senior CIA officers who objected were overruled. When Brennan was confronted with the Steele Dossier's own flaws, he reportedly told his team: "Yes, but doesn't it ring true?" That's not intelligence. That's a political operation. The Clinton/Soros/Steele Assembly Line The declassified Durham Annex shows how it was built. Clinton foreign policy advisor Julianne Smith coordinated with Leonard Benardo — Soros' Open Society Foundations Eurasia director — to "demonize Putin and Trump." Clinton personally approved the plan. Christopher Steele, a British MI6 operative paid by the Clinton campaign, was the delivery mechanism. Soros' Eurasia desk. British intelligence. The Clinton campaign. Brennan's CIA. All aimed at one man The FBI Buried It The FBI was informed of the Clinton plan as early as March 2016. Deputy Director McCabe briefed senior DOJ officials on it. They sat on it — then used the same Steele Dossier they knew was fabricated to obtain FISA warrants on Carter Page. Durham concluded it was "a logical deduction" that Julianne Smith "was, at minimum, playing a role in the Clinton campaign's efforts to tie Trump to Russia." The FBI investigated Trump anyway. Russiagate Didn't Work. So They Built Ukrainegate. The anonymous CIA "whistleblower" who triggered Trump's first impeachment over the Ukraine phone call — identified by investigative reporter Paul Sperry as Eric Ciaramella — was Biden's Ukraine director on the NSC and previously served as deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia at the very NIC where the fraudulent 2017 ICA was constructed. Same desk. Same network. Same target. Sperry reported that Ciaramella and Obama holdover Sean Misko were overheard in the White House just weeks after Trump's inauguration discussing how to "take out" the president. The Ukraine call didn't spark the impeachment. It gave them the pretext they'd been hunting for since January 20, 2017 The Document Schiff Buried When IG Michael Atkinson testified in October 2019, his testimony revealed Ciaramella had lied — he failed to disclose his prior contacts with Schiff's staff on the whistleblower form he signed. Schiff immediately classified that entire transcript "Secret," locked it in a Capitol SCIF, and refused to let even fellow members of Congress see it. It was the only impeachment witness transcript he buried. On March 24, 2026, the House Intel Committee voted to release the Atkinson transcripts. Paul Sperry now reports Gabbard is preparing to declassify an additional top-secret document from Schiff's SCIF that goes even further. The Ukraine Money Loop And then there's this. Just this week, Just the News obtained a declassified intelligence summary showing that in 2022, US spy agencies intercepted Ukrainian government communications describing a plan to route hundreds of millions in USAID "clean energy" funds back to the US — with roughly 90% allegedly earmarked for Biden's 2024 reelection campaign and the DNC. The scheme was designed so funds would move through subcontractors in ways that were, in the intercepts' own words, "difficult to track." Gabbard's team found no evidence the Biden administration ever seriously investigated it. It is not believed to be Russian disinformation. Gabbard has ordered USAID to determine whether the plot was executed and whether criminal referrals to the FBI are warranted Connect the dots. Russia hoax: manufactured by Brennan's CIA, the Clinton campaign, a British spy, and Soros' Eurasia desk — to destroy Trump's first term. Ukraine impeachment: engineered by a CIA network with direct ties to Biden's Ukraine operation, protected by Schiff's deliberate suppression of evidence — to finish the job. Ukraine money loop: intercepts of officials allegedly planning to funnel US taxpayer aid back into Biden's campaign — never investigated by Biden's own intelligence apparatus. Three operations. One common thread: using Ukraine and US intelligence as weapons of American domestic politics. Gabbard is pulling the thread. This is why John Brennan is target NO. 1 of the current Russiagate Grand Jury

English
13
525
1.3K
48.6K
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Clinton Foundation Whistleblowers
@PrometheanActn @BarbaraMBoyd Nobody is covering it because MSM is central to the entire fraud AND systemic corruption. The exact reason why @WhiteHouse just released the App to distribute news and circumvent corrupt media. This same corrupt media which fails to cover our efforts as WBers and litigation.
English
0
10
20
715
Dennis Littlefield 리트윗함
Holly Kesler
Holly Kesler@HollyKesler·
Funny how the legislative process suddenly becomes “suspicious” when someone wants to score political points. A quick refresher on how the Georgia General Assembly actually works: After Crossover Day, bills move from one chamber to the other. That means they go through committee hearings, scheduling, and the Rules Committee before reaching the floor again. This is standard procedure every single year. So when a House bill passes and lands in a Senate committee, that’s not “stalling.” That’s literally… the process. Let’s look at the actual bills cited: HB 990 – Retired Law-Enforcement K-9 Veterinary Care Sponsor: Steven Sainz Official bill text: legis.ga.gov/api/legislatio… This bill passed the House and moved to the Senate Public Safety pipeline — exactly what happens after crossover. HB 383 – Georgia High School NIL Protection Act Sponsor: Brent Cox Legislative page: legis.ga.gov/legislation/70… This bill also passed the House and moved to the Senate side for committee review — again, the normal legislative path. For anyone unfamiliar with the process: thousands of bills are introduced each session, and only a fraction make it through both chambers before the 40-day session ends. Many sit in committee simply because the legislative calendar runs out. Translation: a bill being in committee after crossover isn’t proof of political retaliation — it’s proof that someone just discovered how the legislature works. Bless their hearts. Before pointing fingers at Burt Jones, it might help to read the rulebook first. Civics still matters. 📚
Greg Bluestein@bluestein

Two House Republicans backing Rick Jackson are accusing Burt Jones of bottling up their bills in retaliation for endorsing his GOP rival in the race for governor — amplifying Jackson’s claim that lawmakers fear blowback if they cross the LG. #gapol ajc.com/politics/2026/…

English
1
6
15
890