Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )

14.5K posts

Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) banner
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )

Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )

@future_folklore

Building the paranormal industrial base.

Manhattan 가입일 Ocak 2022
2.5K 팔로잉2.5K 팔로워
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) 리트윗함
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) 리트윗함
Cobalt
Cobalt@cobaltdigital33·
exploring potential 2030s papers
Cobalt tweet media
English
0
1
5
379
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) 리트윗함
Jonathan Gorard
Jonathan Gorard@getjonwithit·
I think, in hindsight, we will come to view the development of AI as more akin to a Eukaryotic Revolution than an Industrial one.
English
74
75
1.1K
69.2K
Michael P Gibson
Michael P Gibson@William_Blake·
The biggest limiting factor for building a starfaring civilization is not money. It's talent.
English
19
14
107
4.5K
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )
I'm convinced that the next wave of Future Folklore businesses and R&D efforts will be among the most lucrative, magical, and paradigm-shifting, while staying integrated with the earth, human heart, & cosmic mysteries. Building the paranormal industrial base. 👻🛸
English
0
1
7
244
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )
Johannes Kepler in a letter to Galileo, 1593: "Provide ships or sails adapted to the heavenly breezes, and there will be some who will not fear even that void."
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) tweet mediaJoel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) tweet media
Manhattan, NY 🇺🇸 English
0
0
3
83
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) 리트윗함
Hyperion
Hyperion@Ortgeist·
Incredible things are happening
Hyperion tweet media
English
3
143
1.3K
17K
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ )
This collision of worlds is right where Future Folklore works... Feeling along for the codes underlying these apparently different domains. Attempting to engineer some answers into the form of something tangible. futurefolklore.github.io/FutureFolklore/
Galactic Troubadour@NousHenosis

@MinuteofZombie Thoughts on Skunk Works’ “Revolutionary Technologies” Director Charles Chase inviting Dr. Kripal to talk to aerospace engineers at MIT about human mystical levitation (and telling Kripal he believe that same energy is how UFOs are propelled)? (And VP James Ryder’s mysticism?)

Manhattan, NY 🇺🇸 English
1
1
7
454
Vacha
Vacha@TVachaW·
The most obvious benefit of feeling joyful is that it feels good. But a more over-looked benefit is that joy gives us access to “joy-intelligence.” I experience that each emotion has its own distinct intelligence. Each emotion causes us to look at the world in a specific way and navigate it in a specific way. We judge and act differently depending on what emotional state we’re in. And my experience is that the intelligence of joy is almost always more functional than most other states of being. Sure, if you’re being chased by a tiger or being physically attacked by someone, then the intelligence native to anxiety / fear / anger may come in quite handy. But in almost all everyday interactions, the intelligence of joy, bliss and peace tends to provide a better guide to acting, judging and strategizing than pretty much all other emotional states. We can be motivated to feel more joy therefore not just because it feels good. But also because it plugs us into the most generally adaptive and functional intelligence we have available to us in most situations.
Vacha@TVachaW

When people say “follow your bliss”, they usually mean: “Learn what things make you feel blissful, then pursue those things.” But I think the wiser way to interpret the advice is: “Learn how to feel blissful independent of any particular thing; then act from that place of bliss.” The former treats bliss as an end point to chase after. The latter treats bliss as the ground from which you act. It is very powerful to act from a sense of bliss ime as, like all emotions, bliss has its own form of intelligence. I find that the intelligence of the blissful mind is much more powerful than the intelligence of eg the anxious or the grasping mind. So by accessing bliss, we access a more functional intelligence. Bliss then becomes the fuel for making intelligent decisions rather than just the outcome of making intelligent decisions. Of course, this mindset leads to a virtuous feedback loop as acting from bliss > more intelligent decisions rather than> more bliss > more intelligent decisions, and so on.

English
7
12
177
20.8K
John Greenewald, Jr.
John Greenewald, Jr.@theblackvault·
Been a bit since I wrote about an AATIP-related released document. Some of you may find this interesting... Finishing up now... dropping shortly.
John Greenewald, Jr. tweet media
English
7
11
112
7.4K
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) 리트윗함
jimmy
jimmy@JIMMYEDGAR·
there is a page on the internet where you have a Cisco quantum computer sample the vacuum of spacetime at the exact moment you hold an intention in your mind and then it is burned forever into a void
jimmy tweet media
English
44
102
2.7K
247.1K
Joel @ Future Folklore ( 🛸🏴‍☠️ ) 리트윗함
Michael Levin
Michael Levin@drmichaellevin·
@SimsYStuart Perhaps criticality, edge-of-chaos en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edge_of_c… type of thing. Hold the idea strongly enough to put your blood, sweat, and tears behind giving it every chance to live, but be ready to modify or drop when needed.
English
8
7
77
2.3K
Science Bob McGwier
Science Bob McGwier@BobMcGwier_N4HY·
@joeljewitt It is time to get serious. Looking for a startup endeavor to get interested in.
English
4
1
2
129
Science Bob McGwier
Science Bob McGwier@BobMcGwier_N4HY·
The President’s directive on UAP et al is much stronger and invasive than that passed in the NDAAs which are law. President Trump's February 2026 directive differs significantly from previous National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) provisions in its source of authority, intent, and bureaucratic mechanism. Here is the breakdown of the key differences: 1. Authority & Mechanism •Trump's Directive (Executive Action): ◦Nature: A top-down political mandate from the Commander-in-Chief. ◦Mechanism: It orders the "Secretary of War" (Defense) and other agencies to immediately identify and start the process of releasing files. ◦Impact: While it signals high-level political will, it currently lacks the legal force of a statute. It initiates a "review" rather than an instant "declassification," meaning agencies can still argue against releasing specific documents for national security reasons. •NDAA Provisions (Legislative Law): ◦Nature: Federal laws passed by Congress (FY2024, FY2025, FY2026). ◦Mechanism: These laws established the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), mandated secure reporting channels for whistleblowers, and directed the National Archives to create a "UAP Records Collection." ◦Impact: These are legally binding procedural requirements. However, the most aggressive provisions (like an independent review board with subpoena power) were stripped out of the final bills, leaving the declassification timeline largely up to the agencies themselves.  2. Specific Goals •The Directive: Focuses on the public releaseof "files," "evidence," and "footage" regarding extraterrestrials and UFOs. It effectively bypasses the need for new legislation by using the President's existing authority to manage classification (though he has not yet signed a blanket declassification order). •The NDAA: Focuses on oversight and process. ◦FY2024: Mandated that agencies review their files and transmit them to the National Archives (but allowed them to postpone public release for 25 years). ◦FY2026: Specifically requires AARO to account for all security classification guides (the rules used to keep things secret) and mandates briefings on UAP intercepts by NORAD and US Northern Command.  3. The "Teeth" (Enforcement) •The Directive: Relies on the President's ability to fire or discipline cabinet members who do not comply. It is a "political hammer" designed to force the bureaucracy to act. •The NDAA: Relies on congressional oversight and funding. The law requires reports to be delivered to Congress, but critics argue it left too many "loopholes" that allow the Pentagon to withhold information under the guise of national security.  In short: The NDAA built the filing cabinet (the legal structure for collecting records), while Trump's directive is an order to open the drawer(force the agencies to actually show the public what is inside!
English
10
10
41
2.9K