Jack Driscoll

132 posts

Jack Driscoll

Jack Driscoll

@jack___driscoll

NYC 가입일 Haziran 2023
273 팔로잉130 팔로워
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
you can sign in to openclaw with your chatgpt account now and use your subscription there! happy lobstering.
English
1.1K
1K
20.5K
2M
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
I can relate to this. Highly reccomend reducing your workflow down to 2-3 agents. Use 1-2 as executors. And 1 as a personal tutor that explains architecture and data flows to you as you build. Ask it questions. Go deep. Sketch stuff out on paper. Build. Learn. Repeat. Take it slower than you think. It’s okay to leave agents waiting. As builders we have forgotten that what often drives us is our curiosity and desire to learn, and that is taken from us when we are trying to maximize agent output. You can outsource your thinking to ai, but you cannot outsource your understanding.
English
1
0
6
650
Austin Kennedy
Austin Kennedy@astnkennedy·
I'm 22 years old and Claude Code is deteriorating my brain. Every single day for the last 6 months I've had 6 to 8 Claude Code terminals open, waiting for a response just so I can hit 'enter' 75% of the time. And it's doing something to me. In convos with a couple of friends, it's been a point that's been brought up pretty frequently. None of us feel as sharp as we used to. I don't know if it's just us, or others in their 20s are feeling the same thing, but it's something I've been thinking about a lot. P.S. I know this is a problem with my reliability/usage of it, not Claude Code itself, but the effects are real nonetheless
English
1.3K
371
9.2K
2M
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
@mercury When the Hats are so heat they have you considering a career transition…
English
1
0
2
237
Mercury
Mercury@mercury·
Mercury hats: a thread
Mercury tweet mediaMercury tweet mediaMercury tweet mediaMercury tweet media
English
9
1
102
8.6K
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
@agilek buddy your bio literally reads “ex pwc” pls relax
English
0
0
0
74
Aditya Agarwal
Aditya Agarwal@adityaag·
Some observations on agents from a lot of time spent installing, using, debugging and building things with OpenClaw, Hermes, etc. - Most people who rave about OpenClaw, HermesAgent etc. have not actually used it. Facts. - Agents are developer products today. They are so so so far from being consumer grade in terms of delight, simplicity, reliability etc. - I wish the agents generated more dynamic interfaces. Don't give me chat. Give me interactive, dynamic apps/webpages. I suspect this will be a next big vector of innovation. - The agents are ultimately a wrapper to code-generation and tool-calling....not to "generative AI". This is important to grok. These agents are doing most of their "work" through iterative tool calling. - Once you understand the core loop behind agentic AI, old school "chat AI" doesn't make sense. The idea of an "always-on" agent that actually adapts, learns and maintains state is a LOT more compelling than a one-off chat prompt. The latter feels much more like a search query. - So much of mangling with agents today is basically setting it up to use browsers and/or your computer. And there are so many constraints! - Installing and running openclaw feels a lot like running Linux in the early 2000s. You spend a lot of time compiling device drivers, setting up configurations etc. You feel a real sense of accomplishment from jerry-rigging everything together but it is a LOT of work to get to the point of utility
English
71
23
419
49.5K
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
Thanks for the comment! - not quite putting Cursor inside Gmail - more like using Gmail/Chat as the intake surface for code work. flow is: -share an email/thread into Chat, -the app classifies what kind of request it is -a Cursor SDK agent can pick up the actual engineering task: bug investigaiton, doc update, draft a fix, turn thread into working pr, etc... The interesting bit is moving from “someone emailed me context” to “an agent is working on it." and I'm sure it could helpful in email responses as well!
English
0
0
2
860
mark abad
mark abad@macky_abad01·
@jack___driscoll wait you're putting cursor inside gmail?? that's wild. what does the agent handle, sorting emails or drafting replies or something? genuinely curious what tasks you're offloading to it
English
1
0
1
1.3K
Gregor
Gregor@bygregorr·
@jack___driscoll The real flex isn't the tool, it's picking the right surface. Gmail is where decisions actually live, not a sidebar nobody opens.
English
1
0
1
821
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
The biggest difference IMO is that Cursor SDK isn’t just “call an LLM with tools.” It’s exposing the same coding-agent runtime Cursor already uses: repo context, edit/search/terminal workflow, streaming status, model choice, and local/hosted execution. For this demo, Gmail/Chat is just the intake/collab layer. Cursor SDK is the part that can actually go operate on a codebase like a Cursor agent would. (in short: the harness)
English
0
0
3
534
Dennison
Dennison@DennisonBertram·
@jack___driscoll What is different about the cursor SDK than the other SDK's on the market?
English
2
0
1
651
鶴田 浩之|CPO@StudyPocket
めっちゃよさそうやん CSが客先からPRドラフト書けるのでは Notion議事録から軽微な開発アクションプランを一部勝手に実行してくれるようになったり
Cursor@cursor_ai

We’re introducing the Cursor SDK so you can build agents with the same runtime, harness, and models that power Cursor. Run agents from CI/CD pipelines, create automations for end-to-end workflows, or embed agents directly inside your products.

日本語
1
0
2
1.8K
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
ty! I actually avoided the browser-extension path. The trick is using Gmail’s native “share in Chat” flow, then letting a Google Chat app pick up the context and route it through theCursor SDK. Much less brittle than injecting UI into Gmail, and the result lives in a thread I can share with people on my team!
English
0
0
1
981
YabsssAI
YabsssAI@yabsssai·
@jack___driscoll that's so cool you embedded it directly inside gmail, what was the process like integrating it with gmail's browser extension restrictions?
English
1
0
0
1.4K
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
@christianjesusz probably not a browser extension tbh. the whole thing I like here is that Gmail already has a “add to Chat” button. The user can push an email thread into a real workspace conversation and the agent can work from there. feels much cleaner than injecting UI into Gmail.
English
0
0
0
562
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
@aye_aye_kaplan Woooo thanks for the bump! Very early stages but planning on open sourcing the blueprint for this soon!
English
0
0
2
46
Selene
Selene@vaaselene·
is anyone using Gemini?
English
887
13
1.1K
147.8K
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
How it works: → Gmail “add to chat” → google chat opens and i tag my agent "@uma" (custom google app) → pulls in the email thread + user intent → Gemini Flash Lite routes the request → Cursor SDK hands it off → Cursor Cloud Agents do the work → Results get streamed back to google chat app
English
0
0
11
2.8K
Jack Driscoll
Jack Driscoll@jack___driscoll·
@pranaviyer27 I love nyc. Being in tech is awesome but I think I would get sick of it if it I lived in the sf bubble. Staying close to friends in finance, fashion, theatre, law etc… is something I’m grateful for everyday
English
1
0
0
29