Jared the Skeptic

2nd night of moon/planet/stargazing with my son, through the @ExploreSci telescope we got from @CloudBreakOptic. I figured out how to use the phone adapter this time, but didn't think to save in RAW. 😥 ... Tweaked the contrast & such with the @pixlr app.

@AdonaiOnGaia The more that flerfers ignore and deny objective, observable reality, the more they look like ignorant denialists.

The more they defend the globe, the more retarded they look.

@FlatEarthModel If you were standing on the hour hand of a giant clock that was laying on the ground, face up, do you think you would feel yourself moving?

Question to Globies : Have you ever felt the globe spin ? Do you have a vestibular sense ?? #flatEarth #FlatEarthers #globies

@jontheless4347 @TLJSlick @globalist13903 Is that so? 🤨

@jaredvc @TLJSlick @globalist13903 Evolution is false. Jesus is God.

If you can't prove "atheism". You cant say "there is no God". At best you're an "agnostic". You don't know.. God is the necessary precondition for logic and intelligibility. Atheism cannot account for anything therefore it is false, and is incoherent to reality.

@aten_ichnaten @Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow You're not a fan of actual facts?

@jaredvc @Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow Professor get a life

@kingydave @TheGlobeIsDead Please describe how parallax works on a flat Earth.

@jaredvc @TheGlobeIsDead Parrallax can work on both globe tard earth and flat earth. You won't give me any evidence that is exclusive to globe earth because there is none.

@BrockRiddickIFB No, YOU lied. x.com/i/status/20604…

@kingydave @TheGlobeIsDead Parallax is strong evidence of the Earth's motion around the sun. Otherwise nearby stars just wobble arbitrarily, which I already mentioned.

@jaredvc @TheGlobeIsDead Parallax is your proof? Pathetic

@TLJSlick @jontheless4347 @globalist13903 I often say that the concepts of religion & theism are outdated, frankly childish, understandings of nature and coincidence left over from before humans had methods of investigation.

@jontheless4347 @globalist13903 The first cave men shit out in the planet with no logic or reason for religion—wonder how they’re enjoying burning in hell.

@Seanmcauliffe10 @jontheless4347 @globalist13903 Indeed. Math, logic, reasoning, etc... All human concepts that describe functions our brains are able to do and consider. If humans vanished, the societal concepts would disappear with us, but the universal facts they helped us understand would continue to be true.

@jontheless4347 @globalist13903 That’s like asking where did math exist before humans. If every human were wiped out, math would still be true.

@Leviticus20_13_ I don't think theists realize how laughable the idea of Hell is to people that don't believe.

I don't think people realize how terrifiying Hell actually is.

@LotsaGray @CosmicPtolemy @ddowell327 Indeed. The post says "time to debunk..." and then proceeds to not debunk anything. 🤨

@CosmicPtolemy @ddowell327 You are doing a horrible job. You try to get something out. Someone ask for info. You snipe at them saying you did already. If you really wanted to get the word out you point them at those 80 posts. You make it as easy as possible. You are asking something of us not us of you

𝟏/ 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐭𝐨 𝐝𝐞𝐛𝐮𝐧𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐭𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫𝐝 𝐬𝐨𝐥𝐚𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐥 For decades, the astronomical establishment has clung to a model of the Sun so riddled with contradictions and so energetically defended that one can only despair at the collective delusion. Look at the standard solar image: the glossy, taxpayer-funded diagram that has adorned every textbook and planetarium globally. A pristine cutaway of our star, complete with a blindingly hot core, radiative zone, convective zone, photosphere, chromosphere, and corona – all “drawn to scale,” the caption pompously informs us. Sunspots with their umbra and penumbra, granules, flares, prominences, solar wind – the whole tired pantheon of standard-model paraphernalia. This is what generations of astronomers have been taught, funded, and tenured to believe. In this fantasy world the Sun is a gigantic hydrogen bomb, a self-contained thermonuclear reactor where fusion magically occurs at fifteen million degrees in the core, energy somehow radiates outward without melting everything in its path, and the outer atmosphere then inexplicably heats up to millions of degrees again. Built on a century-old nuclear fusion assumption at a time when no other mechanism could be envisioned for generating the solar power. Never tested, never proven, contradicted by every finding of the solar probes, it clings on desperately.

@BabyD1111229 No.

Did the T-Rex have wings? #Throwback

@CapitalMisto @benwehrman Another obscuring horizon that gets farther away with increased altitude. (Not how flat works.) That boat was just beyond the angular resolution limit, not the horizon. It's clearly between the camera & the horizon. It didn't sink bottom-up or unsink top-down behind the horizon.

@jaredvc @benwehrman

Beautiful illustration of how the Sun, Moon, and Stars appear and disappear from our visual perspective while observing from the ground on Earth. People ask me all the time why folks in the south can't see the North Star (Polaris). It's because it is simply too far away. (Same reason why northern observers cannot see the Southern Cross constellation). The celestial bodies dip down over the horizon when they reach around 6,000 miles (9,600km) away from our observation point on the ground (in the x-axis direction). You can confirm this yourself by taking note of the exact time the sun disappears from sight during sunset, and checking where on Earth it's noon at that time. It will be roughly 6,000 miles away. Our eyes cannot see infinitely! Increasing your altitude, and using a high-powered zoom lens will increase your optical range...but only slightly, as you can't do anything about the atmospheric thickness/smog.

@kingydave @TheGlobeIsDead How is it observably flat? Parallax shows stars shifting over the course of 6 months. Either we orbit around the sun or nearby stars are wobbling arbitrarily. The stars are visible to us as point sources of light, no matter how much you magnify. 10s of TRILLIONS of miles apart

@jaredvc @TheGlobeIsDead Everyone literally lives on an observable stationary flat earth. You see the sun move but you think you're moving. The stars all focus with zoom at the same time but you think they are millions of miles apart. Water is always level but you think it's curves at some point.

@rightorrightnow @Alenjebiga @aten_ichnaten It's literally stated directly om the map. The image above is just too low rez to see it.

@Alenjebiga @jaredvc @aten_ichnaten You lazy dullard, you can do a ten second internet search to be educated about a polar projection of a globe which is what Gleason himself stated about the map.

@Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow @aten_ichnaten That escalated quickly. And yes, it's basically the same map. Both are azimuthal equidistant globe projections. Any flat map will always be distorted, because that's what happens when you project the surface of a 3-dimensional object onto a 2-dimensional medium.

@rightorrightnow @jaredvc @aten_ichnaten Es ist die gleiche Karte du dummes Stück Scheiße 😂 Das 2te ist die Karte von der flachen Erde von 1892 😅

@aten_ichnaten @Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow Actually, it's because all observable geometry fits a globe. No observation ever made has ever matched a flat Earth, ever.

@jaredvc @Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow

@Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow @aten_ichnaten x.com/i/status/20602…

@jaredvc @rightorrightnow @aten_ichnaten What is that?

@Alenjebiga @rightorrightnow @aten_ichnaten It's still just an AE (Azimuthal equidistant) projection of the globe. Hence the significant distortion in the southern hemisphere.

@rightorrightnow @jaredvc @aten_ichnaten Es war eine Standart Karte aus dem Jahr was redest du Junge 😅 Und diese Karte benutzt die UN bis heute also von was reden wir hier?