Dr Mark van Rijmenam, CSP@VanRijmenam
If AI is supposed to revolutionize science, why are we drowning it in garbage data?
➡️ David Baker, a biochemist and newly-minted Nobel laureate, warns that AI's impact on science will stall unless the data fed into these models improves. Alongside Demis Hassabis and John Jumper from Google DeepMind, Baker was awarded the Chemistry Nobel for AI tools revolutionizing protein research.
➡️ Their success relies heavily on the high-quality Protein Data Bank (PDB), a rare example of well-curated data essential for meaningful scientific progress. However, as AI models increasingly rely on bloated, internet-scraped datasets, the risk of producing biased, erroneous results grows.
The roadblock isn’t just model size but data quality:
👉 Garbage in, garbage out: AI outcomes depend on clean, curated inputs.
👉 Unique data sources: Few datasets match the PDB’s rigor and utility.
👉 AI's potential: New tools enable breakthroughs, but without solid data, progress falters.
❓ As AI models scale, will science keep up by curating more high-quality data, or will noisy inputs undermine the breakthroughs we expect?
Read the full story in MIT Technology Review: technologyreview.com/2024/10/15/110…
#Data #Research #NobelPrize #Future #Science
----
💡 𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗲𝗻𝗷𝗼𝘆𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁, 𝗯𝗲 𝘀𝘂𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝗹𝗼𝗮𝗱 𝗺𝘆 𝗻𝗲𝘄 𝗮𝗽𝗽 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗮 𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝘆𝗼𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗹𝗲𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿 - you can have real-time insights, recommendations (a lot more than I share here) and conversations with my digital twin via text, audio or video in 28 languages! Join >6000 users who went before and go to app.thedigitalspeaker.com to sign up and take our connection to the next level! 🚀