流寇

@_1jiis 这是餐桌上的蛋糕😋

سؤال جغرافي : أين تقع هذه الهضاب ؟

@commiepommie 中国幸运的避开了威权体制的各种弊端，中共也是真心帮助最穷困的老百姓，但很难在世界上其他国家复制这种模式。

🇨🇳 The West loves to lecture China about “democracy” while their own voters get more fed up with every election. Politicians come and go, campaigns make all kinds of amazing promises. But once the votes are in, nothing really changes. The same groups stay in control and regular people are left waiting. Is that really what they call freedom of choice? China operates on a completely different model. One that can be hard to understand and easy to misinterpret. President Xi Jinping didn’t gain power through inheritance or wealth. He worked his way up for over forty years, serving at every tier: villages, counties, cities and provinces. He has spent his life governing, not just running for office. Top leadership is elected by the National People’s Congress, while local residents choose their community representatives, with the entire system built from the grassroots up. The Communist Party of China is the world’s largest political organisation, with almost 100 million members rooted in communities nationwide. Its five-year plans aren’t just empty promises either; they get delivered. This is how China pulled hundreds of millions out of poverty, built the planet’s most extensive high-speed rail network and now takes the lead in electric vehicles, renewable energy and key cutting-edge technologies. The country’s leadership has a clear mission: to rejuvenate the nation and work for the Chinese people. When people see real progress being made, the system stays stable, rather than cycling through one disappointment after another. This is supported by the polls. Long-running research from Harvard Kennedy School shows Chinese public satisfaction with the government consistently sits above 90 percent. Edelman’s global trust surveys record government trust at 89 to 91 percent among the highest worldwide. National happiness scores range from 70 to 79 out of 100. Considering everything, it’s reasonable to argue he’s among the most effective national leaders in the world right now. It’s understandable why the critics target this; after all, China keeps achieving things their nations simply cannot. If you witness this steady progress firsthand while living here in China, the reality is simply astonishing. At the end of the day, I have to wonder: does that so-called Western freedom of choice truly deliver better lives for ordinary people, or is it just better marketing?

@Amelia181672271 相比之下，共产党没杀一个台湾人却被他们称为恶魔

台灣議員謝龍介怒稱：日本人殖民台灣後屠殺了60至70萬台灣人。 這段歷史至今民進黨和青鳥都不敢面對

@YanjiuF44290 @zaobaosg 这都被你看出来了？说说小日本和国民党杀过多少台湾人，共产党又杀过几个？

日菲并沒有侵犯台灣海洋權益。只有中國窮凶極惡每天派軍艦軍機侵擾台灣。 美日菲沒有任何飛彈瞄準台灣，從不想侵占台灣，更願意協助防衛台灣。 中共是台灣唯一敵人。美日菲是台灣的朋友。朋友之間縱有糾紛，也達不到中共侵犯屠殺台灣的嚴重性的萬分之一。 中共和在藍共第五縱隊拼命煽動對美日菲等友台國家的仇恨，是想轉移焦點以掩護中共用武力犯台。

日菲在南中国海的专属经济区存在重叠，与台湾主张的专属经济区也高度重叠。对于日菲宣布协商海洋划界，台湾官方最初并未警觉且表示“肯定”，直到争议闹大，才表示日菲协商不应该损及台湾的利益，或在损及台湾利益时与台方协商。 #Echobox=1780726980" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">zaobao.com.sg/forum/comic/st…

@zaobaosg 这事是联合早报能报导的吗？还是说说中国大陆海巡船非法巡航台东海域的事吧😂

@SupportJimmyLai 还是多宣传一下它要求老美核平中国大陆的言论吧

History remembers the people who refused to stay silent. Jimmy is one of them. He denounced Chinese communism, defended the rule of law, and gave Hong Kong a free press, knowing exactly what it would cost him. "I believe that if I do the right thing, the strength will come." — Jimmy Lai #FreeJimmyLai

@DalaiLama 扎西德勒🙏

ANNOUNCEMENT - His Holiness the Dalai Lama is scheduled to depart Dharamsala tomorrow for Delhi, where he will undergo medical treatment on his left knee. Following his recovery, he is to travel to Ladakh toward the end of June for an extended stay. June 4, 2026

@Amelia181672271 应该有具体的名字，我记得有一位姓崔的小战士是被暴徒当街烧死的。

今天是6月4日，倭寇、青鳥、曱甴、法輪功等最容易高潮的一天。 但我也會紀念198964那些因反恐怖抗暴而犧牲的解放軍戰士。 在此向你們致敬！🫡

@mikepompeo 你站远点

37 years ago today, the Chinese Communist Party set the military against its own people, killing & injuring thousands. Xi Jinping can try his hardest to erase this history, but we will never forget - and we will always stand with the people of China who seek freedom.

@zhangcw04 这是潮汕美食

河南这个叫啥呀？！好吃晕了。

@bbcchinese 当年我在郑州亲眼目睹了一个地痞流氓高喊打倒共产党就加入了学生游行队伍。

今年是中国“六四”天安门事件37周年，当年曾经参与1989年民主运动的亲历者，不少人的下一代已长大成人，外界把他们称为“六四二代”。 BBC中文采访了三名父母辈曾经参与过八九民运的的二代，在传承和记忆断层之间，他们经历了怎样的挣扎？ bbc.in/3PWioNo

@DanCollins2011 如果他们成功，台湾早就独立，旅顺会有美军基地，我们家现在都没空调用😓

If the Tiananmen protestors had succeeded China would probably be as poor as India today.

@MSZE15 我也是第一次听说有日本人参与化学武器的处理，无论如何也应该表示感谢，毕竟这些危险品不是这一代日本人留下的。

中国のニュースに日々触れているけど、化学兵器処理に日本人が常時従事しているとは知らなかった。頭が下がると同時に80年経っても残る戦争の罪を考えた。内閣府HPによると中国各地に化学兵器が残存。深刻な吉林省ハルバ嶺では神戸製鋼が請け負い、人材募集もあった。次の戦争準備してる場合じゃない😧

@chinasmpb 国家决策部门还是有高人的，基建、高铁、新能源、生态治理等等政策都踩在了点上👍

经过连续许多年的生态治理，新疆几十万平方公里大沙漠里的塔里木河流域已经宛如江南水乡一般。 现在我们都说，中国的传统能源和新能源（生态能源）的建设成就是如何如何成功，为中国接下来的经济发展、高技术发展都打下了深厚的基础——但是，这种结论是在看到了显著结果之后的结论，这样的结论实际上是滞后的。 我们现在更应该看到，在能源策略之外，这十多年来，中国在国土生态改造方面一样规划精心且投入巨大，而且正在缓慢获得好成果，我相信未来中国的生态改造国策对经济民生的向好推动一定是巨大的，一定是大出人们意料的，这个结论我看现在就可以提前做出了。

@dw_chinese 扎西德勒🙏

本周三，90岁的流亡藏人最高精神领袖达赖喇嘛被正式授予格莱美奖。他在社交平台X的官方账号下公布了这一消息。 今年2月，达赖喇嘛以《冥想：达赖喇嘛尊者的反思》（Meditations: The Reflections of His Holiness the Dalai Lama）这本有声书获得格莱美奖有声书类别的肯定。当时音乐人洛福斯·温莱特 （Rufus Wainwright）代为领奖。 达赖喇嘛表示，他对这项荣誉“心怀感激”，并称获奖肯定有助于让他的理念传递得更远。“这张专辑巧妙地将尊者关于慈悲、和平与人类一体的思考与印度古典音乐融合在一起”，达赖喇嘛X官方账号写道。 达赖喇嘛获得格莱美奖的消息报道之后，北京方面表示强烈不满，称反对将艺术奖项用于“反华政治操纵”。 现年90岁的达赖自1959年以来一直流亡，并被北京指责为叛徒与分裂分子。

@VOAChinese 看看现在的中国，谁在历史错误的一边一目了然。

“中共站在历史的错误一边” 美国会两党议员纪念天安门事件37周年 voachinese.com/a/bipartisan-u…

@Widmdge 就一句话，摆拍死全家

Không biết phải nói gì luôn các bạn à

@bbcchinese 一个稳定强大的中国政府正是台湾卖国政权所害怕的。

周四（6月4日）是中国“六四”事件37周年，有民间团体在台北举办纪念集会。台湾在多个城市有相关活动。在台北，民众在大雨中点灯悼念、现场也有不少人来自香港。

@D162Michele 估计我现在连个空调都用不上😅

Imagine where China would be today if this CIA-backed colour revolution had been successful.

@AngelicaOung 我能肯定的是如果当年没有小平同志的强硬手腕，现在我会连个空调都没有。

I was a rather precocious nine-year-old in Taipei on June 4th 1989. In my childish mind's eye...helpless students were kettled into Tienanmen square like animals in a pen before the tanks rolled over them, creating a kind of bloody, dense, student-patty. It was a flashbulb moment that represented the evil of the communist party of China and the destruction of the flower of China, the best of the best, by the worst of the worst. Growing up sometimes means finding out the fairytales of your childhood is far more complicated than you thought. This is Tienanmen Square 1989, as I understand it today. There was no bloodshed in the square. Dissident leader Liu Xiaobo (who subsequently won the Nobel Peace Prize) negotiated the peaceful withdrawal of demonstrators as the troops moved in. By the time the iconic Tankman stood in the way of PLA tanks, the crackdown was basically over. If you watch the video all the way through, you'll see tankman block the tank a few times, climb on top of it, before being led away. This is not to say, of course, that there was no bloodshed. They mostly happened in clashes between violent demonstrators and PLA troops off the square. The "peaceful protestors vs brutal regime" picture is inaccurate and incomplete. The crowd ambused, mutilated, lynched, disembowled and burned the corpses of PLA soldiers. This is when the shootings happened: not in the square, not on the students. You have to understand, in 1989, China didn't know how to deal with protests. They had no riot police. They rolled out the tanks and the troops not because they were determined to exterminate the crowd, but becauses they were unprepared. Since then, it's been largely a hushed and censored topic in China, which I think is a mistake. Because once you go through what actually happened, June 4th was a tragedy, not a crime. It was Deng Xiaoping that made the decision to initiate the crackdown. He knew he'd bear the infamy. But looking at China in 2026, it's hard not to come to the conclusion that Deng did the right thing. The students in the square might have been truly idealistic and only wanted the best for China, but if the Chinese government have given in to their demands, China would not have been a democratic paradise but might have fallen into a chasm of chaos. We all saw what happened when the people of Russia cast off the Soviet Union only to be plunged into decades of pitch black despair. Had China done what the students asked, could the results have been any better? Already almost in retirement...Deng, who already saved China with his reform-and-open-up, arguably saved it again. Most ordinary Chinese people I know now sees June 4th as an example of a failed color revolution, or an externally-driven attempt to destabilize China from the outside. They don't percieve the crackdown as the government oppressing the people, but of China asserting its sovereignty. I know this is a controversial topic, and will probably draw a lot of condemnation from the usual crowd. So let me end with a criticism of the Communist Party of China: Stop censoring and shielding the history so much, and be frank about the past. When you try and erase June 4th, it means you yourself cannot tell your side of the story. The cultural revolution, for instance, works far less well as an anti-China talking point because the mistakes of that era are widely acknowledged and digested in China itself while June 4th still seems too raw to touch. Below you can find the full "tankman" video. It only takes two minutes to watch. Try and watch it as if you're seeing it for the first time. What do you see? See less