Levai N.

8K posts

Levai N. banner
Levai N.

Levai N.

@mashlevi

You should become who you are 🇿🇼®

Harare,Zimbabwe 가입일 Haziran 2015
288 팔로잉254 팔로워
Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa
Sabhuku Temba P. Mliswa@TembaMliswa·
Makomichi, your riddles are a sign of emptiness hauchina chinhu mauri now you are creating your own fiction. Having said that, as long as the Headmaster remains in office, it is imperative that all subordinate figures exhibit unwavering loyalty and respect towards him. The Deputy, despite any aspirations he may harbor regarding the Headmaster's position, must abstain from acting as if he were the de facto successor; such behavior constitutes a profound disrespect to the incumbent as it undermines his current initiatives. This principle extends to adherence to school resolutions as well. The Deputy should not selectively comply with certain mandates while dismissing others; such insubordination could jeopardize his standing and even lead to his removal. Compliance with resolutions made by the school and the School Development Committee (SDC) is essential, as these resolutions embody the foundational agreements that govern the institution. Every school, at any given moment, operates under a singular center of authority. Even with a known successor in the wings, the Deputy must operate within the bounds of respect and humility, casting himself in the supportive role that honors the headmaster. Furthermore, the protocols of succession remain firmly in place, necessitating that any aspiring candidate for the Headmaster's role must navigate an electoral process. Unilateral appointments and the handpicking of successors regardless of intent, even by the headmaster himself, are entirely unacceptable. Thus, any Deputy with aspirations for ascension must diligently cultivate the requisite support from the electorate for such ambitions. This entails embodying a gracious demeanor characterized by being honesty, forgiving, and an accommodating temperament that fosters goodwill among all stakeholders.
Isaac Makomichi@IsaacMakomichi

Latest gossip, Ignore it at your own risk The headmaster is reportedly not happy with the performance of some teachers hanzi hapana chinobatika chavari kuburitsa panyaya iri mudariro iyi. He is not sure whether the project to extend the school wall will pass or fail. Even if it passes, he is asking more questions about the repercussions and the chaos it might trigger. But one thing for sure is that he now believes his deputy is the next headmaster, but he is not sure about the time. One other important thing to note is: don’t be overzealous when you attack the deputy head and his people because the headmaster will not risk his family to protect you if things go south. Some teachers from the headmaster’s side have already shifted their stance. Others are also expected to shift their stance soon, before it is too late.Whether you support the extension of the school wall or you support the deputy, please don’t do bad things to the other side because both the headmaster and his deputy will not risk their families to protect someone who did bad things to others. Some teachers might be reassigned soon or retired, especially those who attacked the deputy. The wife of the headmaster is also an intelligent lady and she is now seeing that people have been lying to her, and she is not happy with the insults her husband is receiving from the public. So what is the way forward now? The headmaster might concede a defeat to win. What am I saying? I’m saying the headmaster might make it easy for his deputy to succeed him and all the bad blood or grudges will be settled completely, with guarantees. It will be a disaster for those who talked *too* much shit to the deputy head and his supporters. The coming of the deputy is inevitable and those who know the school well, including the headmaster, have accepted that. The warning is: please be careful with what you do to the deputy because you might be the scapegoat. Do not say Isaac Makomichi didn’t warn us. Peace will prevail and there is no war coming. Only those who undermined the deputy and his people might be wiped out. It’s time to repent before it becomes too late. Keep this message in your heart and share with others. It’s not worth it to risk your everything attacking the deputy when no one will risk his/her family to protect you. @TembaMliswa @LynneStactia @nickmangwana @ZANUPF_Official

English
12
1
2
12.4K
Savheya veFashion
Savheya veFashion@Savheya_Happie·
I have witnessed 3 properties developed by Chiyangwa. 1. Shopping Mall at 1st & Masotsha Ndlovu 2. Along Enterprise close to Pardington square 3. Corner Crowhill Rd & Carrick Creagh Rd All of them are white elephants, no activity, poor ambience, no tenants, poor designs etc. Is he romped or he clueless but with a bit of cash?
Savheya veFashion tweet media
English
25
6
37
7.6K
ZBC News
ZBC News@ZBCNewsonline·
PRESIDENT MNANGAGWA DEPARTS FOR ESWATINI STATE VISIT  President Dr Emmerson Mnangagwa has left the country for Eswatini to attend a double celebration marking the 40th anniversary of the reign of King Mswati III and his 58th birthday. The President was seen off at the Joshua Mqabuko Nkomo international Airport in Bulawayo by Vice Presidents General Retired Dr Constantino Chiwenga and Colonel Retired Kembo Mohadi, cabinet ministers and service chiefs. #Zimbabwe #Eswatini #Diplomacy #RegionalRelations #SADC #ZBCNews
English
10
5
42
13.2K
Levai N.
Levai N.@mashlevi·
@RMapimbiro @zimlive Haagh he has so many grown up kids.They are probably the ones pushing to kip going,otherwise he would have taken a different route by now if they all as grown up man take principled stand!
English
1
0
0
5
rodzapimps
rodzapimps@RMapimbiro·
@mashlevi @zimlive The President is old pamwe he doesn't even know the tender magnate was following him around lol , Ana Collin are supposed to protect their Dad from Abuse nekuti its fast getting there he won't be in control of his faculties.
English
1
0
0
7
ZimLive
ZimLive@zimlive·
📸 President Emmerson Mnangagwa and Botswana’s Duma Boko have been touring stands at the Zimbabwe International Trade Fair in Bulawayo with tender magnate Wicknell Chivayo in tow
ZimLive tweet mediaZimLive tweet media
English
20
12
82
14.1K
Shumbakadzi👑
Shumbakadzi👑@shumbakadzi_zim·
There is power in Unity. This is the best trio of the land!
Shumbakadzi👑 tweet media
English
3
3
6
394
BaShona.
BaShona.@BaShonaBaShona·
Congradulations kwatiri isu ma FAZ @fazPresident well done team.
BaShona. tweet mediaBaShona. tweet media
English
3
7
17
2.8K
Levai N.
Levai N.@mashlevi·
@RMapimbiro @zimlive We shld begin asking the President himself this qstn,coz haagh Wicknel dont give a damn😃
English
1
0
0
9
rodzapimps
rodzapimps@RMapimbiro·
@zimlive Haaasi akuzvinyanya here tender magnate uyu his bringing the presidency into disrepute its too much now when President Ruto came he was doing the same thing, I hope the Presidents Children reprimand him zvanyanya. I dont hate him but haaaa he should grow up its now pathetic.
English
1
0
1
129
Nick Mangwana
Nick Mangwana@nickmangwana·
EHE FAZ YAHWINA Forever Associate Zimbabwe (FAZ) Specialty Award – Best Thematic Exhibit #ZITF2026
Nick Mangwana tweet media
English
94
9
45
20.2K
Noah Gwiba
Noah Gwiba@NoGwajaa·
@DougColtart This is a classic case of exaggeration. Parliament remains predominantly elected by the people. Chiefs are part of Zimbabwe’s constitutional structure and represent traditional leadership not presidential “proxies.” Their role is defined and limited by law. As for appointments, they exist to ensure balance, inclusion and expertise not to override democracy. The core of Parliament remains elected by citizens, and that’s what defines its democratic legitimacy. Let’s debate honestly kwete kungoita noise....
English
1
0
1
79
Doug Coltart ✊🏼🇿🇼
Under #CAB3, Parliament WON’T be democratically elected: - 10 will be appointed by the President - 18 will be indirectly appointed by the President & under his control (chiefs) - The remainder will be elected using an undemocratic delimitation process controlled by the President:
Doug Coltart ✊🏼🇿🇼 tweet media
English
22
106
191
5.2K
Levai N.
Levai N.@mashlevi·
@nickmangwana Kkk ka look ka Mundenda at the VP.Its like he has seen an alien or something 😃😃
English
0
0
0
61
Nick Mangwana
Nick Mangwana@nickmangwana·
Vice President Gen. Rtd C.G.D.N Chiwenga and Vice President Col.Rtd K.C.D Mohadi have arrived at the #ZITF2026 grounds for the official opening ceremony. Botswana's President Duma Boko is the guest of honor for this year's edition of the trade expo.
Nick Mangwana tweet mediaNick Mangwana tweet mediaNick Mangwana tweet mediaNick Mangwana tweet media
English
5
2
17
3.4K
Levai N.
Levai N.@mashlevi·
@CMukungunugwa These are not the ones we deal with everyday tho.Ava ndeveku ZITF chete😃
English
0
0
0
54
C. H. MUKUNGUNUGWA
C. H. MUKUNGUNUGWA@CMukungunugwa·
ZIMBABWE REPUBLIC POLICE ZITF STAND 2026 Smartly dressed officers 🇿🇼
English
15
11
43
12.5K
mutonhodza
mutonhodza@chari639408·
Ukaona munhu anovenga Cab3,iyo iri ndiyo mudiriro yenyika how can a normal person hates ,kubudirira kwenyika yake ,a true Zimbabwean unomuona nekusapota Cab uyo asingadi mmm hatizivi unobvepi cause kubudirira kwenyika kunounza mufaro kwandri uye nemwana wese wemuZimbabwe
mutonhodza tweet media
Indonesia
23
6
11
792
Nyasha
Nyasha@NNyashaYessur·
Is ZITF an all government departments show why is there very little private sector participation. ZBC takes a stand next you have Zanupf one, FAZ, Ministry of Information, City of Harare, National Parks. Is this WHAT WE CALL businesses. Where is the PRIVATE SECTOR?.
Nyasha tweet media
English
7
4
11
551
hazel
hazel@hazelwekwagondo·
Fighting the Constitutional Amendment Bill No 3 is Fighting The Will of of the People The Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3, a people-driven governance framework hinged on: ✅ Extending President @edmnangagwa's term to 2030 ✅Changing the electoral cycle from 5 to 7 years ✅Revamping the Zimbabwe Electoral Commission, etc. was a PLEA by the masses who sought to provide long-lasting solutions to Zimbabwe's governance. Any attempt to discredit, fight, and smear this bill is tantamount to fighting the will of the people, thereby fighting democracy as well. After all has been said and done, the Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3 was a CALL by MASSES to prioritize policy continuity, development, and minimize the toxicity brought about by elections. 2030 Baba Va Mnangagwa Vanenge Vachitonga. #CAB3BHOO #ED2030BHOO
hazel tweet media
English
21
13
21
634
Levai N.
Levai N.@mashlevi·
@ProfJNMoyo Stop the mutilation of our constitution.Sctn 91 safeguard is that three or MORE counts as full term.But the constitution DID NOT leave MORE to be defined anyhow, stop this LIE pliz.According to this constitution MORE isn't forever but is capped at 5 yrs.Vakapasa maths can help
English
0
0
0
360
Prof Jonathan Moyo
Prof Jonathan Moyo@ProfJNMoyo·
Debunking a Persistent and Dangerous Myth: Zimbabwe’s Constitution Contains Only One Presidential Term Limit Provision: In the intense public debate over the Constitution of Zimbabwe (Amendment No. 3) Bill, an utterly false claim is being repeated relentlessly and without a single shred of evidence: that the Constitution contains two separate presidential term limit provisions—sections 91(2) and 95(2)(b). This assertion is not merely incorrect; it is constitutionally impossible. No constitution anywhere in the world has ever created two distinct term limit provisions for the presidency. Section 95(2)(b) is not—and, according to the Constitution’s own crystal-clear definition in section 328(1), read with section 328(7), cannot possibly be—a term limit provision. A genuine presidential term limit provision restricts the total or maximum length of time any individual may hold or occupy the Office of President. Section 95(2)(b) does nothing of the sort. It simply defines the length of each presidential term as five years, running coterminous with the life of Parliament. In straightforward language, section 95(2)(b) regulates the office itself, not the person who holds it, and says absolutely nothing about how many terms or the length of time any one individual may serve. The Constitution of Zimbabwe (2013) contains only one term limit provision: Section 91(2). This clause is unequivocal and ironclad. It prohibits any person from serving more than two terms as President, with the vital safeguard that three or more years in office counts as a full term. It is only this single provision—and this provision alone—that actually limits the total time any individual can occupy the highest office in the land. Nothing illuminates this fundamental distinction more powerfully than comparative constitutional analysis—the gold standard for both public education and responsible policymaking. As the ancient wisdom has it, there is truly nothing new under the sun. A careful examination of proven global practice, vividly illustrated in the attached infographics, reveals three clear and time-tested approaches that nations around the world have taken when designing presidential term rules: Case 1 – Term length only (unlimited re-election permitted) Constitutions in this category have a single provision that simply defines the length of each presidential term, leaving the number of terms entirely open. This constitutional model operated successfully for decades—for example—in Botswana (31 years, 1966–1997), the United States (163 years, 1789–1951), and Zimbabwe itself (23 years, 1987–2013). Case 2 – Two separate provisions Here constitutions have two separate provisions: one that sets the length of each presidential term; and a second, entirely distinct clause that limits the total time any person may serve as President. This is precisely the framework that has—for example—operated in Botswana since 1997, South Africa since 1996, the United States since 1951, and Zimbabwe since 2013. The first infographic displays this clear separation of the two provisions across all the four countries. Case 3 – Combined in one elegant clause Constitutions in this category have a single constitutional provision that seamlessly merges both term limit concepts—defining term length while simultaneously imposing the limit. This approach has—for example— stood the test of time in Argentina (since 1994), Chile (since 1980), France (since 1958), Mexico (since 1917), the Philippines (since 1987), and South Korea (since 1987), as shown in the second infographic. The historical record is especially telling. Botswana introduced its separate term limit provision only after 31 years of independence, the United States after 163 years, and Zimbabwe after more than two decades of operating under a pure term-length provision. South Africa, by contrast, enshrined both provisions, separately, from the very first day of its democratic Constitution in 1996. These facts drive home an irrefutable truth: a provision that merely defines the length of a term has never been—and can never be—a term limit provision. The distinction is not a technicality; it is the bedrock of constitutional integrity. Recognising it clearly ensures that public discourse and debate on constitutional amendments is anchored in facts, logic, and proven international best practice, rather than convenient fiction to advance nefarious political agendas. Zimbabwe and Zimbabweans deserve nothing less!
Prof Jonathan Moyo tweet mediaProf Jonathan Moyo tweet media
English
166
147
145
52.3K
Levai N.
Levai N.@mashlevi·
@daddyhope Toxicity is everywhere in Africa politics.But for the sake of ubuntu shouldn't the government have yielded to family demands here?
English
0
0
0
341