SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV
715 posts

SAM / MAV
@mavrick_dev
Human engineer by day entrepreneur by night - Converting caffeine☕ into amazing hand-crafted digital products 📦 focusing on complex web projects #ai #web3
Genesis 가입일 Eylül 2011
3.7K 팔로잉1.2K 팔로워
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함

SAM / MAV 리트윗함

BREAKING: 🇺🇸 Fed Chair Jerome Powell says #Bitcoin is a competitor to gold, not the US dollar.
English
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함
SAM / MAV 리트윗함

"Microservices first" indicates that the person advocating that idea isn't thinking like an architect. No single architectural pattern is appropriate in all contexts. An architect will first identify the essential system characteristics and then pick an architectural pattern with pros and cons that match the characteristics. Microservices are fault-tolerant, highly elastic and scalable, incremental-development friendly, and support hot deploys into running systems. They are also slow, complex, and network-based (I see that as a huge negative). Use the pattern if those characteristics (pros and cons) work for you. If they don't, use a different pattern. There's also a third choice. A very simple microservice system can run as threaded components in a monolith, thereby giving up the elasticity but also lowering the complexity quite a bit by getting rid of the network issues. In other words, you can meld patterns to create new patterns. It's all about identifying characteristics and choosing (or inventing) appropriate patterns.
English





















