Emanuel Scirlet

@evisdrenova Not really

The cursor fall-off is going to be studied for decades. I don't know any engineer who uses them anymore. Not to say that others don't, but it's obvious that they're no longer on the tech frontier. Still, a $60b outcome in 4 years is nothing to sneeze at...

@ericzakariasson @Ramin_Ger This is amazing!

@Ramin_Ger we just launched this! x.com/cursor_ai/stat…

how can we make cursor 3 better? send us any bugs, feature requests, or feedback you have!

@Hadley I disagree. IDEs are here to stay.

I’m just a lowly seed investor, but I don’t get Cursor at $50B. Every frontier dev I know has moved off Cursor and off IDEs entirely. Only laggards are still on it. And dev tools always move from thought leaders to laggards, never the reverse.

@kapilansh_twt No it isn't and is not even close. Google+ probably was

Antigravity is one of Google's worst product failures made it free still can't compete with Cursor, Codex, Claude Code quality beats free every single time

@Felirami @cryptopunk7213 It is not an IDE, so let’s start with that. Second of all is buggy AF, and third their harness is significantly weaker than Cursor. So yeah, not the same at all

@sciem13 @cryptopunk7213 You haven’t used Claude desktop? I give it to you that cursor has many more features but wait and see, claude moves extremely fast

xAI acquiring cursor would be a massive win for obvious reasons: - grok becomes a #1 coding agent overnight. cursor has the #1 coding agent harness - cursor gets 500M new users that help speed up product development = better model faster - elon acquires an insanely talented team (he poached 2 top engineers 2 weeks ago) i really hope this happens

@Felirami @cryptopunk7213 No they don’t. Especially Claude

@cryptopunk7213 Game changing opportunity since codex and Claude desktop already does what cursor is doing

@cryptopunk7213 I really hope it doesn’t. One of the main reasons I like Cursor is being able to Switch between models for different things.

@brian_lovin Great tech but hard to use beyond toy use

wtf is in the water at cloudflare?

@sama Looks great!

Lots of major improvements to Codex! Computer use is a real update for me; it feels even more useful than I expected. It can use all of the apps on your Mac, in parallel and without interfering with your direct work.

@GergelyOrosz Working on it contextual.live

Prediction: The next 12-24 months, "UX-pilled" builders will be in massive demand. Who can create intuitive interfaces, web+mobile+desktop apps that "feel good," natural, fast, and far better than the competition. THIS will be the difference vs those building "just" with AI.

@theo I also have one when you switch between CoWork and Chat it messes up the streaming so messages from the agent appear before your messages and everything looks broken.

List of bugs and ux issues I can remember off the top of my head: Hotkey section - Permission mode hotkey always opens on left/main tab - ctrl+tab cycling switches tab focuses when you get to a thread that is already open, changing which toggles - Permission switch 1-4 buttons only work on left/main tab - QnA number selection only works on left/main tab - Diff view hotkey always opens left/main tab - They fixed the terminal hotkey because I complained but left the rest broken lmfao - cmd+w will close all tabs...except the "main" tab, which gets reset into a "new chat" state instead Sidebar from hell - The "settings" button in the sidebar is inline'd in the top project. If you change visibility of top project, it will close menu. Stays open when changing visibility for other projects - You can drag and drop threads. But you can't change order of things. Ever. For any reason. But you can drag up to pin! Or to drop the thread in the main view (don't do this the multi-thread view is entirely broken) - The "recent projects" menu has an ENTIRELY SEPARATE SET OF PROJECTS from the sidebar. - The "v more" dropdown menu isn't a dropdown, it's a side-down despite the arrow. It has 1 item in it. And then a useless "customize" button. That opens a modal. With 2 buttons. - cmd+(num) is used for switching between Chat, Cowork and Code? Why?? Who does this??? - Opening "routines" and "dispatch" takes over main tab, but "customize" is a full screen takeover - "customize" and "customize sidebar" are part of the same menu lmfao General bad things - file -> "open file" does about 15 different things, none of which are opening the file - "bypass permissions" is not persisted, as it is a "mode" now for some reason (i.e. plan mode) - Creating forks implicitly creates worktrees and doesn't tell you - Clicking the folder name is how you get the branch name? What?? It's not visible ANYWHERE ELSE. - The diff sidebar has two separate "sidebar" icon buttons, both do entirely different things. Neither make sense. - You can nest toggleable sidebars in the diff view lmfao - The nested toggleable sidebar only appears at certain screen sizes, but you can still toggle the state even when invisible?? - the x button in diff view closes whole tab, not the diff view Aside from all of this, it is also just really unpleasant to use. It's faster than before, but still really slow. Whole thing has a clunky feel. Animations are cute I guess? idk. This is fucking slop and I genuinely believe they should throw it away and try again. If they need a better starting point, T3 Code is OSS, MIT licensed, and was crafted by people who actually give a shit about user experience. Or they can just buy Conductor. Tbh that's probably their best bet...

Google Stitch can’t design for existing products. Google Stitch is impressive, but it has the same flaw as Lovable+Cursor when it comes to actual product design: great for zero to one, bad for existing apps. So... why not design IN your live product? Comment for MVP access

@victor_bigfield Because one company no matter its size can’t solve all problems in the world

If anthropic and claude can solve all the problems that startups around the world are solving, what's the point of building saas?

@icanvardar Probably not. Just like clis and sdk haven’t before. There will be always users who prefer beautiful UX. A good example of this is cloud where still a lot of operations happen thru consoles

a question that’s been on my mind lately: will ai eliminate saas ui? if you can just express intent and let an llm orchestrate tools in the background, does the traditional saas interface still matter, or does it fade into invisible infrastructure?

@Prathkum It’s a cycle. After anthropic, OpenAI is going to release then Google then Anthropic again

Anthropic seems to be the only player in the AI race right now. OpenAI is not shipping much. Meta seems to be dead already. Google hype is slowly fading away. Grok seems to be lagging behind. DeepSeek was a one-week game. Apple never participated.

@Stormi_luv Coke Zero.

@DmytroKrasun Every API is another point of failure, another unnecessary latency addition

Why depend on one API provider? In principle, there can be an OpenRouter-like product for any API. For example, a screenshot API router, an IP-to-location API router. And then there could be a SuperRouter, a router for any API. Balances pricing, reliability, and quality for you.

@pjvann @alexanderOpalic It is proven that Cursor has a better harness that CC has for example. Also having the multi-modal choice is important still

@alexanderOpalic at this point i am unsure on how a tool like cursor continues to grow. you have all of the major model providers releasing their own tools, who all have the cost advantage being that it's their models. also, these providers have created tools that work consistently better....

Is anyone still using Cursor

@alexanderOpalic Yes.

@gm_mertd Not really. The platform maturity is extremely low. Especially for enterprise

cloudflare would probably be AWS sized business if it had a Vercel like DX