sdlihC luaP 🥸

✊🏻

Yea, no you’re not gonna convince me this is okay or normal.

BREAKING : Massive victory for Spanish 🇪🇸 PM Pedro Sánchez due to his spine Algeria 🇩🇿 has decided to give gases to Spain 12% cheaper due to his firm stand against Israel and US in Iran war 🔥🔥 He's standing on the right of history and also getting free passage through Strait of Hormuz along with cheap energy 🫡 That's what courage does

Another one for the Hague

I'm sorry but how on earth is this not front page news everywhere? A child. Cigarettes extinguished on his body. A metal rod inserted into his feet. In front of his father. This is documented, filmed, and handed over through the Red Cross. Where is the ICC? Where is the outrage from those who lecture the world about human rights?

Mind blowing revelation. Glenn Greenwald confirms that Richard Nixon and Barry Goldwater both complained on tape that the Israel lobby completely dictates American foreign policy. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is a documented reality admitted by US Presidents.

Alex Crawford’s report is outstanding bravery: “‘3taps’ on health workers” Journalists must stand in solidarity with Alex Before she is taken off the air or targeted by 🇮🇱 We know this from what’s gone before Journalists must stand for those so brave to tell the truth.

Absolute masterclass. Glenn Greenwald explains why the world is abandoning the US for China. China hasn't fought a war in 47 years while the US acts like a global bully attacking countries at will and ignoring international law. The American empire is collapsing.

BBC head Tim Davie was removed in a coup led by Israel lobbyist board member Robbie Gibb. His replacement Matt Brittin personally launched a project to support 6,000 Israeli companies over three years through the "Google for Startups" program. A safe pair of hands.

And we're told it's the other side that's a fanatical theocracy...

Former CIA Officer John Kiriakou Drops BOMBSHELL: "There are 10,000 documents [about JFK's assassination] that are never going to be released [by Trump]. Because every single one of them points directly at Israel.”

I don't feel safe in the house I just stole! 😭

Watch ALL of this. Right now.

BREAKING: Israel is dropping bombs on tents packed with families in Gaza. These aren’t military targets. These are displaced people with nowhere left to run.

Journalist and war correspondent Janine di Giovanni: ​"If a missile hits a hospital in Ukraine, Europe calls it a war crime." ​"But if multiple missiles hit Gaza and 100 people die, it becomes Israel's right to defend itself."

US journalist Abby Martin about Israeli society: “Israeli society has gone full fucking fascist. It's like Berlin 1930... They know the kids are starving. They agree with it...” “I'm talking to people from all walks of life. Every single person espoused genocidal rhetoric..”

Here’s Zack Polanski with Jeremy Corbyn last night, talking about the 2017 election, when Corbyn’s Labour got three million more votes than Starmer did in 2024.  If these two work together, I wonder what could be achieved at the next election. 👍

Anyone in favor of the US stranglehold on Cuba should listen to this Newsmax interview with @RyanGrim, who just returned from there with harrowing stories. His key question: why do Americans want to dictate who governs Cuba, while forcibly causing Cubans' deaths from no fuel?

Australian female doctors working in Gaza have provided these testimonies: ​"We are filming this video because we could die at any moment." ​"Between 70% to 80% of our patients are children and pregnant women." ​"I delivered a baby for a woman in her ninth month who had lost her head." ​"Please, stop this horror and terror."

When asked: 'how many babies have you sniped?' Eastland Christopher Staveley replied: 'not enough'. Staveley is a British jewish doctor.

I don't think people realize just how extraordinary what we're witnessing with Iran is. I was arguing with a dear journalist friend of mine yesterday who was telling me that Iran was winning, yes, but only on the strategic level, not tactically. The type of thing a skinny kid getting stuffed in lockers in highschool tells himself to make himself feel better: "These people will BEG to work for me in ten years. Everyone knows jocks peak in highschool. They'll literally beg." 😏 I think that's precisely wrong, and that's what makes the Iran war different. As of now, Iran is in fact holding its own tactically too. Think about other U.S. wars of aggression these past few decades. Take Vietnam, Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Serbia, etc. (the list is unfortunately very long). The pattern was roughly always the same with an immense power differential between aggressor and victim. These wars were, by and large, imperial: the empire attempting to crush a much weaker people whose only realistic recourse was guerrilla resistance. And that is when they actually had the will to resist: some - like Libya - barely even bothered, just resigning themselves to their fate (despite being, at the time, the richest country in Africa). As spectators of these wars, if you had any moral sense, the dominant emotion was a kind of helpless disgust: you were watching a giant stomp through someone else's house. Sure, the U.S. actually lost many - if not most - of these wars, famously replacing the Taliban with the Taliban or being expelled with their tail between their legs from Vietnam, but the power differential was no less real for it. It's just that power doesn't always guarantee victory: sometimes the giant can't kill everyone, and eventually tires of trying. But the “victories” won this way were always pyrrhic at best: the people endured, yes, but what they were left with was a country in ashes that takes decades to rebuild. Meanwhile, in the grand scheme of things, the giant walked away with little more than a bruised ego. Iran is - remarkably - proving to be an entirely different beast: when others were merely surviving a giant, Iran appears to be able to compete with one. What just happened over the past 48 hours is the best illustration of this. You had the President of the United States issue a formal ultimatum: reopen the Strait of Hormuz within 48 hours or we "obliterate" your power grid. Iran's response was essentially: we dare you, if you do this we'll make all your Gulf allies uninhabitable within a week. And, as we saw, Trump backed down: pretexting non-existent "VERY GOOD AND PRODUCTIVE CONVERSATIONS" with Iran, he said his ultimatum no-longer applied (or, rather, became 5 days). Adding he now envisaged the Strait of Hormuz being “jointly controlled by me and the Ayatollah.” To the amusement of Iran’s diplomacy (x.com/IraninSA/statu…). That, folks, is a textbook tactical victory. It is, remarkably, Iran demonstrating in this instance that it had escalation dominance over the United States of America. That is, the ability to credibly threaten consequences so severe that the US - for perhaps the first time since the Cold War - found it preferable to stand down. That's no skinny kid being locked in a locker dreaming of revenge fantasies. That's the kid grabbing the bully's wrist mid-shove and watching his face change. And it's not the only tactical victory in this war so far. Take the episode over the Israeli attack on Iran's South Pars gas facility. Iran had warned that if that happened U.S. allies in the region - including Israel - would face a symmetrical response. And they delivered: famously devastating Qatar's Ras Laffan facility - which produced roughly 20% of global LNG supply - and leading, according to Qatar themselves, to a $20 billion loss of annual revenue for the next 5 years (oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-…). Not only that but they also managed to hit Israel's Haifa refinery (aljazeera.com/news/2026/3/19…), one of the country's most strategic and protected sites. The result was Trump distancing himself from the South Pars attack, saying that Israel had "violently lashed out" unilaterally and that "NO MORE ATTACKS WILL BE MADE BY ISRAEL pertaining to this extremely important and valuable South Pars Field." Israel then said it wouldn't strike Iran energy sites anymore (bloomberg.com/news/articles/…). From where I stand, that's another tactical victory. It is, at least, Iran demonstrating that is can fight back **symmetrically** against the U.S. and its allies. Not through asymmetric resistance with IEDs hidden in the roadside or traps hidden in the jungle, but eye for eye, and against some of the most heavily protected sites on the U.S.'s side. That's qualitatively different from any other adversaries the U.S. has directly fought in recent wars. There's plenty more, such as the pretty relevant fact that Iran has gained control of the single most strategic energy chokepoint on earth and the U.S. is finding it impossible to break that control. To the point where Trump has been reduced to publicly begging China - of all countries - for help, which given Trump's ego mustn't have been easy to do. Only to be told no. By China. And by everyone else he asked. This is the topic of my latest article: how this is, in fact, the first genuine "multipolar war." First, in the narrow sense: because Iran is revealing itself to be a genuine pole of power - not a superpower, but an actor that cannot be submitted, which is all multipolarity is. And second, because the war itself is accelerating multipolarity everywhere else: the U.S. has never been more isolated, never looked weaker and its security guarantees have never been more hollow. In my article I lay out the full scoreboard - military, economic, political - and explain why this war has already changed the world, regardless of how it ends. Enjoy the read here: open.substack.com/pub/arnaudbert…